Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Investing In Tesla | Page 29 | Money Talk
Started By
Message

re: Investing In Tesla

Posted on 10/29/18 at 10:02 am to
Posted by Janky
Team Primo
Member since Jun 2011
35957 posts
Posted on 10/29/18 at 10:02 am to
Musk is still tweeting and stirring shite up. He is gonna get fricked up if he doesn't stfu.
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
87095 posts
Posted on 10/29/18 at 10:17 am to
Whatever happened to the "every social media post will be vetted beforehand" clause?
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
87095 posts
Posted on 10/29/18 at 10:23 am to
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
51358 posts
Posted on 10/29/18 at 11:04 am to
quote:

. Many people here are financially tied to fossil fuels


Yea and we know the majority of electricity in this country is produced with natural gas.
Posted by Omada
Member since Jun 2015
715 posts
Posted on 10/29/18 at 11:33 am to
quote:

The real reason why Tigerdroppings hates Tesla has nothing to do with the business model or finances.

Or, and feel free to call me crazy here, TSLA just has bad financials and a ridiculous stock price that make it a terrible investment. TSLA has a similar debt to assets ratio as Ford and GM, but TSLA has failed to officially report a profit.

Through Q3 2018, TSLA has produced 404k vehicles in its lifetime. Meanwhile, Ford's 2017 production was 6.6 million vehicles, or 16.5x greater, and GM's 2017 production was 9.6 million vehicles, or 24x greater.

Meanwhile, TSLA has a market cap of ~$57 billion. GM has a market cap of ~$47 billion, and Ford has a market cap of ~$37 billion. Ford's dividend yield is ~6.5%, and GM's is ~4.5%; TSLA, obviously, does not pay a dividend.

The WSJ also reports that F has a tangible book value of $8.53, and the stock is currently priced at $9.30 a share (or 1.09x tbv). GM's tangible book value is $20.82 a share, and the stock is currently priced at $33.40 a share (or 1.6x tbv). TSLA's tangible book value is $22.60 a share, and the stock is currently priced at $331.60 a share (or 14.67x tbv).

TSLA could be the future of the automobile industry, but its potential future success is largely or entirely 'priced in' (side note: as much as I hate that phrase, it's appropriate here).
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
134173 posts
Posted on 1/18/19 at 1:03 pm to
I apologize for bumping this old thread but I thought today's news release announcing layoffs of 3,000 employees by Musk is worth noting.

I sense a bit of panic, or maybe even despair, in what he said this morning.

quote:

Tesla Cutting More Jobs As Elon Musk Talks Of ‘Difficult’ Road Ahead

“Tesla will need to make these cuts while increasing the Model 3 production rate and making many manufacturing engineering improvements in the coming months,” he said. “Higher volume and manufacturing design improvements are crucial for Tesla to achieve the economies of scale required to manufacture the standard-range (220 mile), standard-interior Model 3 at $35k and still be a viable company.

There isn't any other way.

“Tesla has only been producing cars for about a decade and we’re up against massive, entrenched competitors. The net effect is that Tesla must work much harder than other manufacturers to survive while building affordable, sustainable products.”

TSLA shares are down 12% (-$41.55/share) as I post this
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
172179 posts
Posted on 1/18/19 at 6:15 pm to
I think they made a critical error in judgment with the model 3 roll out. They should have rolled out the advertised 35k base model first imo. I'm one of the lost customers because I cancelled the reservation when it looked like a bait and switch
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
134173 posts
Posted on 2/28/19 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

I think they made a critical error in judgment with the model 3 roll out. They should have rolled out the advertised 35k base model first imo. I'm one of the lost customers because I cancelled the reservation when it looked like a bait and switch
You can now get back in line for the $35,000 model.

Tesla announced after the market closed today that they will finally start producing the "cheap" Tesla.

I haven't seen all the details but one nugget of information in the announcement is the $35,000 offer is only valid for reservations taken over the next 90 days. After that the price goes up to $50,000.

I'm trying to figure out that market strategy....
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
28201 posts
Posted on 2/28/19 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

I'm trying to figure out that market strategy.


Customers with short memories
Posted by southernelite
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2009
53562 posts
Posted on 3/1/19 at 10:07 am to
quote:

I'm trying to figure out that market strategy....


Trying to shore up cash before the end of Q1.

They communicated that wouldn’t be profitable this quarter a month after “Tesla will be profitable every quarter here on out”....
Posted by southernelite
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2009
53562 posts
Posted on 3/1/19 at 11:07 am to
Lol Tesla fanbois downvoting me
Posted by PetroBabich
Donetsk Oblast
Member since Apr 2017
5099 posts
Posted on 3/2/19 at 9:29 pm to
quote:

Short Term ie 18 months I'll say $500-700 and longer term like a decade


Was dabigfella trolling or did he really believe this?
Posted by TigerDeBaiter
Member since Dec 2010
10712 posts
Posted on 3/3/19 at 10:19 pm to
Pump and dumper.

End thread.
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
87095 posts
Posted on 3/4/19 at 7:43 am to
quote:

Pump and dumper.

End thread.

You're saying he was pumping a 50B market cap company?
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
134173 posts
Posted on 3/4/19 at 8:20 am to
quote:

Short Term ie 18 months I'll say $500-700 and longer term like a decade



Was dabigfella trolling or did he really believe this?
I'm pretty sure he believed it. Look how he attacked me for just giving my opinion that TSLA is a speculative stock. You would have thought I had insulted his mother.

Jim Cramer said it better last week when he said he could see TSLA going to $1,000/share and he could also see it going to $0.
Posted by GeneralLee
Member since Aug 2004
13959 posts
Posted on 3/4/19 at 10:31 am to
Don't care about Tesla one way or the other, had a few shares for a while but it was too nerve wracking to hold onto as a long-term investment. Part of me hope Tesla goes under so that Musk can focus more on SpaceX. I think electric vehicles are coming to replace most fossil fuel vehicles now anyway with other manufacturers being not too far behind Tesla. Musk's contributions to society are much more important on the SpaceX side.
Posted by LSUneaux
Metairie and MAGA AF
Member since Mar 2014
4879 posts
Posted on 3/4/19 at 10:49 am to
Agreed. We don’t need Musk for the electric vehicle revolution. Other companies can do that heavy lifting. Musk’s time is more valuable to society with SpaceX, and I’d even argue his Boring Company which can revolutionize transportation, which would have a ripple effect on other industries.
Posted by CajunTiger92
Member since Dec 2007
2865 posts
Posted on 3/4/19 at 11:16 am to
quote:

think electric vehicles are coming to replace most fossil fuel vehicles now anyway


Currently and for a number of years in the future, electric vehicles in this country are fossil fuel vehicles.
Posted by donRANDOMnumbers
Hub City
Member since Nov 2006
17410 posts
Posted on 3/4/19 at 2:16 pm to
so glad i got the hell out over 300. don't catch this falling knife
Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11945 posts
Posted on 3/5/19 at 11:04 am to
quote:

Musk’s time is more valuable to society with SpaceX, and I’d even argue his Boring Company which can revolutionize transportation, which would have a ripple effect on other industries.


Dude... Are you serious with this? I like Space X independent of Musk. I wish he would go quietly into the night and let real engineers take over that business. But the Boring Company is quite possibly the biggest joke in modern business history. Bigger than Theranos. Do you really think if his ideas were actually economically feasible and more efficient that the millions of engineers that actually work in these fields wouldn't have done the same?
This post was edited on 3/5/19 at 11:06 am
Jump to page
Page First 27 28 29 30 31 ... 34
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 29 of 34Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram