Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us I rest my case, Buffalo got screwed | Page 5 | More Sports
Started By
Message

re: I rest my case, Buffalo got screwed

Posted on 1/18/26 at 10:49 am to
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39235 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 10:49 am to
quote:

Doesn't matter if it was ripped out, punched out, ground knocks it out, or the he loses control on his own-its all the same. If any of that happens, the WR loses possession and its not a catch.
Correct. The catch did not survive the ground - in part because there was a zealous defender there to help make it so.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39235 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 10:50 am to
quote:

Ok so defenders should never allow ball carriers to be stable on the ground.

Everyone start spearing center mass and arms when a ball carrier goes to the ground. Don’t let him come to rest or be stable.

Or we could just see a guy holding a ball and his back/shoulders/elbow/knee touching the ground and call him down.
I said "survived the ground". And yes, the defender should absolutely do what he can be doing to make sure that doesn't happen. Which the defender in this instance successfully did.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39235 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 10:51 am to
quote:

If you see a WR falling to the ground as he is making a catch shouldn’t you wait til he hits the ground to nail him? Seems like that’s an easier way to create force to jar the ball loose
Why would that be easier?
Posted by whatiknowsofar
hm?
Member since Nov 2010
26827 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 10:51 am to
quote:

He survived the ground


If that was true, then

quote:

He didn’t survive the defender ripping the ball after hitting the ground with bis back


This isnt surviving the ground.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39235 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 10:52 am to
quote:

If he’s on the ground with possession
He WASN'T YET in that condition. If no defender had been there, and then he had lost the ball, you wouldn't think it was controversial at all. He doesn't have possession until he survives the ground. And that takes more than a milisecond of contact with the ground to establish.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
110061 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 10:52 am to
So then legally defenders can rip the ball out of any WR on the ground right?
Posted by QJenk
Atl, Ga
Member since Jan 2013
17486 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 10:53 am to
quote:

Ok so does everyone know the exact time needed to “survive the ground”?


I don't know the exact ruling per the NFL rulebook. But I feel very confident in saying this. If a receiver loses possession of the ball .5 seconds upon hitting the ground. That is going to be an incomplete pass almost every time.
Posted by Bamadog75
Alabama
Member since Mar 2017
1728 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 10:53 am to
Get s life dude, all you do is argue about dumb shite that you can't let go of. The buffalo WR caught the ball the Denver DB grabbed it in mid decent and when they hit the ground he pulled it out instantly.

There was no fighting for the ball like other video you tried to show. You could look at cooks body language he knew what happened, he never argued one bit. He put his head down with disgust and kept it there mad at himself for letting the ball get ripped out.

You can never admit when your wrong , you must be hell to be around.

Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39235 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 10:53 am to
quote:

I want to hear this from people that agree with the call
I agree that there is some gray area in this part of it - judgment call of the ref. But that's true for EVERY "survives the ground" review.

I actually thought the Denver TD in the endzone earlier was arguably not a catch because it seemed to me that the ball moved when it hit the ground OOB. I think they must have ruled he survived because he also took a step or two OOB before hitting the ground with this body. But I don't actually know.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39235 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 10:54 am to
quote:

So then legally defenders can rip the ball out of any WR on the ground right?
Up until the receiver has survived the ground, yes...obviously?
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39235 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 10:55 am to
quote:

I don't know the exact ruling per the NFL rulebook. But I feel very confident in saying this. If a receiver loses possession of the ball .5 seconds upon hitting the ground. That is going to be an incomplete pass almost every time.
This. I don't understand why people are acting like the rule suddenly transformed into INSTANTANEOUS.
Posted by Funky Tide 8
Bayou Chico
Member since Feb 2009
56435 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 10:55 am to
quote:

We never got to see if Cooks would have lost the ball from the ground because the defender ripped it out before it had the chance. You can’t just assume Cooks would lose the ball through the ground.



He did lose the ball though. Doesn't matter how-he did.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
110061 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 10:56 am to
quote:

If a receiver loses possession of the ball .5 seconds upon hitting the ground.
except here I guess

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


My entire point is this:

quote:

actually thought the Denver TD in the endzone earlier was arguably not a catch because it seemed to me that the ball moved when it hit the ground OOB.


The same rule being used differently in the same exact game

This post was edited on 1/18/26 at 10:57 am
Posted by QJenk
Atl, Ga
Member since Jan 2013
17486 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 10:59 am to
quote:

We never got to see if Cooks would have lost the ball from the ground because the defender ripped it out before it had the chance.


Yes, the defender ripped the ball out before Cooks could maintain possession of the ball on the ground. This is called defense.

quote:

In your interpretation, if a WR is on the ground how long does a defender have to rip it out? If a receiver falls to the ground and is sliding along the ground with a ball, can a defender slide in and rip it out then?


I don't know the exact timeframe. But I feel confident in this, if a receiver can't maintain possession of the ball for even .5 seconds on the ground. It's not a catch.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
62557 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 10:59 am to
It was the right call.
Posted by Funky Tide 8
Bayou Chico
Member since Feb 2009
56435 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 11:00 am to
The ball can move and still be in possession right? Just because it moves doesn't automatically make it an incomplete pass?
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
110061 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 11:00 am to
quote:

I don't know the exact timeframe. But I feel confident in this, if a receiver can't maintain possession of the ball for even .5 seconds on the ground. It's not a catch.
Look up and respond to the Denver go ahead TD

Ball instantly bobbles and WR loses possesion before regaining it OOB
Posted by whatiknowsofar
hm?
Member since Nov 2010
26827 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 11:00 am to
quote:

So then legally defenders can rip the ball out of any WR on the ground right?


If they dont survive the ground then yes.
Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
37251 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 11:01 am to
quote:

He did lose the ball though. Doesn't matter how-he did.


it does matter how he did, what are you talking about?

if a receiver was laying on the ground after making a catch and a defender ran over and just kicked it out of his hands, you can’t just go “ope he lost the ball doesn’t matter how”

calling it this way just goes against everything we have seen previously. Cooks had control of the ball on the way to the ground and defender contacted. He loses ball due to defender ripping it out after he’s on the ground. Cooks wasn’t bobbling it. Cooks didn’t lose control mid air. The defender didn’t have complete control until after the ground.

This post was edited on 1/18/26 at 11:02 am
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
110061 posts
Posted on 1/18/26 at 11:01 am to
quote:

The ball can move and still be in possession right?
No. Possession is lost the insane at it bobbles , but it didn’t immediately make it incomplete. Problem is he is laying OOB when possession is regained
This post was edited on 1/18/26 at 11:02 am
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram