- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kentucky vs. Charlotte Bobcats
Posted on 3/25/12 at 2:45 pm to BayouBengals03
Posted on 3/25/12 at 2:45 pm to BayouBengals03
there was a thread just like this 2 weeks ago 
0
Posted on 3/25/12 at 2:49 pm to Suntiger
Trevor Booker
Posted on 3/25/12 at 2:52 pm to BayouBengals03
Strictly comparing them as college players:
DJ Augustine > Marquis Teague
Kemba Walker > Doron Lamb
Gerald Henderson = MKG
DJ White = Terrance Jones
Tyrus Thomas < Anthony Davis
Eduardo Najera, Matt Carrollm, and Corey Maggette were also better college players than anyone coming off of Kentucky's bench.
DJ Augustine > Marquis Teague
Kemba Walker > Doron Lamb
Gerald Henderson = MKG
DJ White = Terrance Jones
Tyrus Thomas < Anthony Davis
Eduardo Najera, Matt Carrollm, and Corey Maggette were also better college players than anyone coming off of Kentucky's bench.
Posted on 3/25/12 at 2:57 pm to xenythx
If MKG, Teague, and Davis were on I think it could be pretty close. All of those guys will be in the NBA next year and getting playing time or even starting on better teams than Charlotte. It isn't that much of a stretch to say Kentucky has guys in some positions that are better than Charlotte has
And I forgot to even mention Lamb
And I forgot to even mention Lamb
This post was edited on 3/25/12 at 2:58 pm
Posted on 3/25/12 at 2:59 pm to Tiger1242
Lol
Charlotte 120-70
Charlotte 120-70
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:00 pm to AlexLSU
Charlotte can't play defense well enough to hold Kentucky to 70 points in an NBA game.
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:08 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
Charlotte can't play defense well enough to hold Kentucky to 70 points in an NBA game.
They did against the Hornets.
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:09 pm to xenythx
What if you took the best 15 players off Kentucky and Baylor's team and made one team to take on Charlotte in the same conditions?
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:09 pm to lsu31always
well...
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:10 pm to BayouBengals03
Kemba ran fricking train on CBB last season and he is not Charlotte's best player.
Charlotte by 25+ if they played by NBA rules as you said.
Charlotte by 25+ if they played by NBA rules as you said.
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:13 pm to BayouBengals03
Not playing defense well against other NBA teams is not the same as playing defense against a group of 19 year olds.
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:13 pm to Vicks Kennel Club
I think people are misinterpreting me to mean that Kentucky would somehow win.
They wouldn't. They would lose 98 out of 100 times. However, I am saying that it may be the closest comparison we've had in a while. It wouldn't surprised me at all if Kentucky kept it at around 20 if they played really well.
They wouldn't. They would lose 98 out of 100 times. However, I am saying that it may be the closest comparison we've had in a while. It wouldn't surprised me at all if Kentucky kept it at around 20 if they played really well.
This post was edited on 3/25/12 at 3:14 pm
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:14 pm to volfan30
quote:
10 times at Rupp and UK would win a couple.
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:15 pm to AlexLSU
quote:
Not playing defense well against other NBA teams is not the same as playing defense against a group of 19 year olds.
yeah but pretty much everyone bends charlotte the frick over backcourt-wise, even scrubs
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:15 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:Under the BEST case scenario, they keep it around 20. They lose 100 times out of 100.
They wouldn't. They would lose 96 or 97 out of 100 times. However, I am saying that it may be the closest comparison we've had in a while. It wouldn't surprised me at all if Kentucky kept it at around 20 if they played well.
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:16 pm to BayouBengals03
Charlotte by 50. Easily.
How's this work, do we also get to disable fatigue like in the video games? Do Kentucky's starters get to play all 48 minutes at full stamina?
What happens when Kentucky has to sub in some of it's bench players, who won't sniff a professional roster? Kentucky will always have some mixture of future (not conditioned) NBA players, and some non-professional players, as their lineup. Whereas Charlotte at all times will have a lineup of 5 NBA players on the floor.
Kentucky already lost to two college teams this year. It's not like they have gone 32-0 and are dominating the college ranks, and are a shoe-in to breeze to the national title like one of Wooden's teams. It would be laughable. There is no comparison.
How's this work, do we also get to disable fatigue like in the video games? Do Kentucky's starters get to play all 48 minutes at full stamina?
What happens when Kentucky has to sub in some of it's bench players, who won't sniff a professional roster? Kentucky will always have some mixture of future (not conditioned) NBA players, and some non-professional players, as their lineup. Whereas Charlotte at all times will have a lineup of 5 NBA players on the floor.
Kentucky already lost to two college teams this year. It's not like they have gone 32-0 and are dominating the college ranks, and are a shoe-in to breeze to the national title like one of Wooden's teams. It would be laughable. There is no comparison.
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:16 pm to Truculent Typist
quote:
They lose 100 times out of 100.
basketball is a funny game, brah
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:17 pm to Carlos
quote:
Whereas Charlotte at all times will have a lineup of 5 NBA players on the floor.
debateable
This post was edited on 3/25/12 at 3:18 pm
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
debateable
Okay, worst case, their roster is 1-12 college standouts who are well-conditioned enough to make an NBA roster, and even if they get cut after this season, probably play in Europe. No college team can come close to saying that.
Posted on 3/25/12 at 3:19 pm to Carlos
quote:
How's this work, do we also get to disable fatigue like in the video games? Do Kentucky's starters get to play all 48 minutes at full stamina?
What happens when Kentucky has to sub in some of it's bench players, who won't sniff a professional roster? Kentucky will always have some mixture of future (not conditioned) NBA players, and some non-professional players, as their lineup. Whereas Charlotte at all times will have a lineup of 5 NBA players on the floor.
It's a good point.
People are undervaluing just how fricking bad Charlotte is, though.
Page 2 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News