- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/11/14 at 7:34 pm to blades8088
Pitiful. I'm sure it's going to cost Ravens backers a TD
I didn't arbitrage either; let BAL ride.
I didn't arbitrage either; let BAL ride.
This post was edited on 9/11/14 at 7:35 pm
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:19 pm to LSUJuice
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:32 pm to ChemE in the OP
1H 10.5 TT steelers. L
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:55 pm to 21JumpStreet
2nd half line is PIT -0.5
O/U 23
Thoughts?
Almost jumped on the OVER, but I dk I'm now unsure
O/U 23
Thoughts?
Almost jumped on the OVER, but I dk I'm now unsure
This post was edited on 9/11/14 at 8:56 pm
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:57 pm to Tiger1242
Just thinking the same with the 2nd half. I have the Steelers +14 in a teaser so I'm not sure what I want to do.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 9:03 pm to jembeurt
The Steelers shite down their leg a few times that first half.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 9:18 pm to Tiger1242
BAL can't possibly play at a slower pace. I thought they'd try to go at some of these weak PIT DBs more often.
This post was edited on 9/11/14 at 9:20 pm
Posted on 9/11/14 at 9:24 pm to Louie T
Had a feeling the Ravens had a game like this in them. Keep it going...
Posted on 9/11/14 at 9:57 pm to ChemE in the OP
quote:
Had a feeling the Ravens had a game like this in them. Keep it going...
I was on the opposite side of this one. I figured they were going to lay an egg after the week they've had.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 10:07 pm to ChemE in the OP
quote:I liked them all week, but I started second guessing myself as the game crept up because of the Rice hysteria. Ended up leaving my BAL -2.5 instead of hedging off. I wish it were a closer game, because this boat racing severely hampered my O44.5
Had a feeling the Ravens had a game like this in them. Keep it going...
Posted on 9/11/14 at 10:11 pm to Louie T
$300 Ravens wg, $200 Ravens sh. 
Posted on 9/11/14 at 10:23 pm to Louie T
quote:
BAL can't possibly play at a slower pace. I thought they'd try to go at some of these weak PIT DBs more often.
They just realized Pittsburgh was so inept offensively that they didn't have to.
Not mad at taking the over. Steelers' early turnover changed the whole game. 6 field goals? Couldn't predict Pittsburgh being this terrible. At least I won with the Ravens.
This post was edited on 9/11/14 at 10:24 pm
Posted on 9/11/14 at 10:25 pm to 4LSU2
quote:
I figured they were going to lay an egg after the week they've had.
meh
Posted on 9/11/14 at 10:28 pm to BayouBengals03
These two are just one of those teams that the O/U is almost always under 40. Tonight's number was warranted because neither defense is that great but they've gone over that number twice in the past decade in the regular season (that's 20+ games) which made me stay away.
/Hindsight
/Hindsight
Posted on 9/11/14 at 10:31 pm to castorinho
quote:
These two are just one of those teams that the O/U is almost always under 40. Tonight's number was warranted because neither defense is that great but they've gone over that number twice in the past decade in the regular season (that's 20+ games) which made me stay away.
/Hindsight
I hear ya.
Just different teams, though. Steelers had a good offensive half in terms of yardage but couldn't get the points they needed. It affected how Baltimore could play on offense. They ran the ball and played slow because they could. If Pittsburgh scores on that opening possession, I think Baltimore would have had to play more up-tempo.
Oh well. I think we learned that Pittsburgh is not good. At all. Bad offensive line and below average defense. Will be fading them a lot in the coming weeks.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 10:33 pm to castorinho
Recent trends had nothing to do with this game going under. Recent trends would have kept the game close; an asskicking from the opening kickoff is what kept the game from having any shot of going over.
Posted on 9/11/14 at 11:36 pm to ChemE in the OP
quote:
ChemE in the OP
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:41 am to Billy Mays
quote:
Yes - one of my favorite plays of the week. I just hope Jonathan Cyprien is healthy enough to play for JAX.
might have gone overboard saying JAX might win straight up but I think they can beat the spread.
going with these on my parlay card:
BUF +1
STL +6- since when do the Bucs cover a spread like that at home? I know STL laid an egg last week but come on. I'm also liking the under in this game. Should be a low scoring game so I'll take my chances.
STL-TB under 37
JAX +6
IND -3
Popular
Back to top


1






