Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us OFFICIAL Week 2 NFL Bet Thread | Page 5 | More Sports
Started By
Message

re: OFFICIAL Week 2 NFL Bet Thread

Posted on 9/11/14 at 7:32 pm to
Posted by blades8088
Covington
Member since Nov 2008
4298 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 7:32 pm to
What a BS call. How in the frick is that roughing the passer? NFL sucks. Can't touch the QB.
Posted by Louie T
Member since Dec 2006
36680 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 7:34 pm to
Pitiful. I'm sure it's going to cost Ravens backers a TD

I didn't arbitrage either; let BAL ride.
This post was edited on 9/11/14 at 7:35 pm
Posted by ChemE in the OP
The Flats
Member since Apr 2011
6382 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:19 pm to
quote:

Where do you get your info on the public's betting trends?


LINK

Let's keep it going Ravens!

Posted by 21JumpStreet
Member since Jul 2012
14878 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:32 pm to
1H 10.5 TT steelers. L
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
33125 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:55 pm to
2nd half line is PIT -0.5

O/U 23

Thoughts?

Almost jumped on the OVER, but I dk I'm now unsure
This post was edited on 9/11/14 at 8:56 pm
Posted by jembeurt
Raceland
Member since Apr 2008
8876 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 8:57 pm to
Just thinking the same with the 2nd half. I have the Steelers +14 in a teaser so I'm not sure what I want to do.
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 9:03 pm to
The Steelers shite down their leg a few times that first half.
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
33125 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 9:07 pm to
I didn't bet
Posted by Louie T
Member since Dec 2006
36680 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 9:18 pm to
BAL can't possibly play at a slower pace. I thought they'd try to go at some of these weak PIT DBs more often.
This post was edited on 9/11/14 at 9:20 pm
Posted by ChemE in the OP
The Flats
Member since Apr 2011
6382 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 9:24 pm to
Had a feeling the Ravens had a game like this in them. Keep it going...
Posted by 4LSU2
Member since Dec 2009
37986 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

Had a feeling the Ravens had a game like this in them. Keep it going...


I was on the opposite side of this one. I figured they were going to lay an egg after the week they've had.
Posted by Louie T
Member since Dec 2006
36680 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 10:07 pm to
quote:

Had a feeling the Ravens had a game like this in them. Keep it going...

I liked them all week, but I started second guessing myself as the game crept up because of the Rice hysteria. Ended up leaving my BAL -2.5 instead of hedging off. I wish it were a closer game, because this boat racing severely hampered my O44.5
Posted by PPBeastMode
Member since Sep 2010
2403 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 10:11 pm to
$300 Ravens wg, $200 Ravens sh.
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 10:23 pm to
quote:

BAL can't possibly play at a slower pace. I thought they'd try to go at some of these weak PIT DBs more often.

They just realized Pittsburgh was so inept offensively that they didn't have to.

Not mad at taking the over. Steelers' early turnover changed the whole game. 6 field goals? Couldn't predict Pittsburgh being this terrible. At least I won with the Ravens.
This post was edited on 9/11/14 at 10:24 pm
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 10:25 pm to
quote:

I figured they were going to lay an egg after the week they've had.

meh
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
87102 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 10:28 pm to
These two are just one of those teams that the O/U is almost always under 40. Tonight's number was warranted because neither defense is that great but they've gone over that number twice in the past decade in the regular season (that's 20+ games) which made me stay away.

/Hindsight

Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 10:31 pm to
quote:

These two are just one of those teams that the O/U is almost always under 40. Tonight's number was warranted because neither defense is that great but they've gone over that number twice in the past decade in the regular season (that's 20+ games) which made me stay away.

/Hindsight

I hear ya.

Just different teams, though. Steelers had a good offensive half in terms of yardage but couldn't get the points they needed. It affected how Baltimore could play on offense. They ran the ball and played slow because they could. If Pittsburgh scores on that opening possession, I think Baltimore would have had to play more up-tempo.

Oh well. I think we learned that Pittsburgh is not good. At all. Bad offensive line and below average defense. Will be fading them a lot in the coming weeks.
Posted by Louie T
Member since Dec 2006
36680 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 10:33 pm to
Recent trends had nothing to do with this game going under. Recent trends would have kept the game close; an asskicking from the opening kickoff is what kept the game from having any shot of going over.
Posted by LSUJuice
Back in Houston
Member since Apr 2004
18025 posts
Posted on 9/11/14 at 11:36 pm to
quote:

ChemE in the OP
Posted by LooseCannon22282
South Alabama Fan
Member since May 2008
35672 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 12:41 am to
quote:

Yes - one of my favorite plays of the week. I just hope Jonathan Cyprien is healthy enough to play for JAX.


might have gone overboard saying JAX might win straight up but I think they can beat the spread.


going with these on my parlay card:

BUF +1

STL +6- since when do the Bucs cover a spread like that at home? I know STL laid an egg last week but come on. I'm also liking the under in this game. Should be a low scoring game so I'll take my chances.

STL-TB under 37

JAX +6

IND -3


Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 16
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 16Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram