Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Spinoff thread about movie costs | Page 2 | Movie/TV Board
Started By
Message

re: Spinoff thread about movie costs

Posted on 6/22/25 at 11:21 am to
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
115972 posts
Posted on 6/22/25 at 11:21 am to
quote:

New over priced hollywood, mostly crappy product, you try to give an excuse for it when there is none.


You’ve misunderstood my posts entirely, those are not excuses, those are criticisms of the industry and the corporate greed that lead to this point
Posted by travelgamer
Member since Aug 2024
2712 posts
Posted on 6/22/25 at 11:23 am to
quote:

One huge factor is the cost of talent. “Stars” want star money…
Plus production costs have soared since “Jaws” was made. Equipment,
locations, expert crew, etc.


Give some talented newbies a chance, I watch a lot of indie now because the actors are good and invested, not in it because they are famous and for a big paycheck. They put in the effort.
Posted by travelgamer
Member since Aug 2024
2712 posts
Posted on 6/22/25 at 11:28 am to
quote:


Sounds like you just should’ve made a “I really like stargate” thread. Idk what you’re looking for here


I do love Stargate, to lighten the thread.



Even though it was the worst.
Posted by UltimaParadox
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2008
52283 posts
Posted on 6/22/25 at 12:52 pm to
Wasn't Jaws massive over budget and expensive for it's time? I think the final budget was over 12 million, which adjusted for inflation is over 70 million today. Considering they cast lesser known actors at the time, seems reasonable to today's costs
Posted by travelgamer
Member since Aug 2024
2712 posts
Posted on 6/22/25 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

the film, originally released in 1975, grossed $260.7 million domestically in its initial run, which is over $1.5 billion when adjusted for inflation according to Forbes.
Posted by travelgamer
Member since Aug 2024
2712 posts
Posted on 6/22/25 at 1:07 pm to
You lose.
Posted by UltimaParadox
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2008
52283 posts
Posted on 6/22/25 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

the film, originally released in 1975, grossed $260.7 million domestically in its initial run, which is over $1.5 billion when adjusted for inflation according to Forbes.


that has nothing to do with the budget of the movie.

It was a high budget movie for the time. Thats not really debatable
Posted by Froman
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2007
38838 posts
Posted on 6/22/25 at 6:41 pm to
The worst part about this from a crew standpoint is on my last couple of movies I made less than I’ve made in about ten years. So it’s definitely not going to labor costs. They waste so much fricking money on bullshite.
Posted by Froman
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2007
38838 posts
Posted on 6/22/25 at 6:45 pm to
quote:

Wasn't Jaws massive over budget and expensive for it's time?


Yeah, it went way over budget. I think the original budget was like 3 million.

ETA: Way over for its time. Doesn’t seem like much now but if you could only offer Spielberg 3 million dollars then spending ten million is going way over budget.
This post was edited on 6/22/25 at 6:48 pm
Posted by SpartanSoul
Member since Aug 2016
2852 posts
Posted on 6/22/25 at 7:01 pm to
It can still be done, they just have to want to do it.

Look at Godzilla Minus One. Phenomenal movie for $15 million. Hell, the CGI was better than some movies with 20x the budget.
Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
49487 posts
Posted on 6/22/25 at 7:08 pm to
A quality move could be made for $1M-$3M.

Honestly cheaper than that if youcknow what you're doibg and the story .makes sense.

Promotion could probably get expensive, but let a studio who buys it worry about that.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471479 posts
Posted on 6/22/25 at 7:09 pm to
quote:

How could they have made movies like JAWS or series like Stargatae that still hold up today on a fraction of the money, but now can't make shi!t unless it costs 100X more?


quote:

New over priced hollywood, mostly crappy product, you try to give an excuse for it when there is none.


Why did you make this thread if you're going to respond to reasonable responses like that?

Why did Hollywo-THERE IS NONE
Posted by deltadummy
Member since Mar 2025
2101 posts
Posted on 6/22/25 at 8:59 pm to
quote:


You lose.


Ah. Didn't know the movie/tv board was generally geared for those who want to illustrate how much of a dick they can be. Thought that was reserved for the Poli/OT area.

To the others on here, is this usual? Someone starting a thread to show how much of an arse they are?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471479 posts
Posted on 6/22/25 at 9:16 pm to
This particular thread is a very specific version of crazy
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram