- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Suicide Squad Rotten Tomatometer Discussion - 29%
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:05 pm to RLDSC FAN
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:05 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:Maybe.
I wonder if him being invited to the JL set had anything to do with it. I mean, that was basically a negative review, but he ends up giving it a fresh rating
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:21 pm to BlacknGold
quote:I mean, I still think I'm going to enjoy it. Like I said before, the negative reviews are starting to become numbing. But I said this about Suicide Squad a few days ago, this thing was all but completed before all of this "DC change" stuff started happening. They did some reshoots, but it was mostly done. WW had begun shooting. I think we'll kind of get an idea after WW, but I don't think we'll know fully what DC wants to be until after JL. They are changing.
im wondering if this has to do with Geoff Johns being promoted. He has time and time again given fans what they wanted in a very organic and creative way when the comics begin to slide in a bad direction. I feel like SS might be the last of this "lost direction."
This post was edited on 8/2/16 at 3:16 pm
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:24 pm to abellsujr
quote:
But I said this about Suicide Squad a few days ago, this thing was all but completed before all of this "DC change" stuff started happening.
Yeah, I think it's pretty obvious the studio interfered with this one. WB doesn't deserve to have DC.
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:28 pm to RLDSC FAN
We'll never know for sure, but I believe the reviews would have been bad anyway.
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:31 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
WB doesn't deserve to have DC.
This is the most honest response thus far. They really don't. They got in early and have taken their properties for granted for decades just based on how popular Batman and Superman are. They never had to try. Marvel sold their highest properties and had to earn their spot. It clearly shows, although when Marvel achieved their success they never changed their formula and the shite is now stale.
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:34 pm to BlacknGold
I think WB is guilty of putting too much trust in the wrong people initially, then they failed at trying to salvage. They just don't have that guy like Marvel has. Maybe Affleck and Johns will do better with more control. Maybe they won't. I don't think we'll know for sure till JL.
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:47 pm to abellsujr
Here's a good rule of thumb: focus on one major storyline: If Snyder had complete control I'm sure he would pick 5 of the biggest JLA stories and cram them into 1 movie like he did with TDKR, Death of Superman, and Wonder Woman.
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:47 pm to 1BamaRTR
quote:
IMBD has it at a 9.3 rating. The reviews do seem to be all over the place but why is Rotten Tomatoes still used in these threads?
That would put it in IMDBs top 5 all time and you think that's reliable at this point? IMDb ratings are a joke until at least a month after a movie comes out. Rotten Tomatoes is way more reliable at this point
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:49 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
WB doesn't deserve to have DC.
I'd accept watching Green Lantern every day for the rest of my life before I'd accept DC being another of Disney's fricking properties.
See the actual movie before you slit your wrists.
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:51 pm to 1BamaRTR
quote:
IMBD has it at a 9.3 rating.
Like this means anything
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:52 pm to Fewer Kilometers
quote:
I'd accept watching Green Lantern every day for the rest of my life before
No matter how this sentence ends, its wrong and your stupid.
quote:
See the actual movie before you slit your wrists.
Don't you tell me when to slit what.
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:55 pm to Fewer Kilometers
quote:
before I'd accept DC being another of Disney's fricking properties.
There's others aside from Disney.
quote:
See the actual movie before you slit your wrists.
Settle down, we're just having a discussion.
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:57 pm to GoCrazyAuburn
quote:
And what they’ve given us is a formulaic, blood and bullet-riddled David Ayer (“Training Day/Fury”) superhero thriller starring a high-mileage Will Smith and Margot Robbie’s butt-cheeks.
That's the best review I've read for a DC movie in a decade
This post was edited on 8/2/16 at 2:58 pm
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:58 pm to ThoseGuys
quote:
this movie just cherry picks from other movies to try and make something profitable.
Welcome to 21st Century Hollywood.
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:59 pm to Fewer Kilometers
You're so last summer.
Posted on 8/2/16 at 3:04 pm to Tactical1
quote:
While Batman and Superman have successfully been translated to film. I
When wad Superman successfully translated to film?
Posted on 8/2/16 at 3:05 pm to Fewer Kilometers
quote:
Fewer Kilometers
Seems like you're the hipster who likes the movies because everyone else hates it.
Posted on 8/2/16 at 3:06 pm to Breesus
quote:
When wad Superman successfully translated to film?
Beforee 2008- When Marvel had their first film and DC had a successful comic book movie run for 40 years- but DC is playing catch-up. So cute.
Posted on 8/2/16 at 3:08 pm to jg8623
quote:
IMDb ratings are a joke until at least a month after a movie comes out on dvd
Posted on 8/2/16 at 3:10 pm to BlacknGold
quote:
Marvel achieved their success they never changed their formula and the shite is now stale.
AntMan
Guardians
Deadpool
All phenomenal films, all different from the main Avengers movies, all after marvel made their mark.
This post was edited on 8/2/16 at 3:15 pm
Popular
Back to top



0






