- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/3/08 at 8:44 pm to Fewer Kilometers
I love love love Kingdom of heaven but the Muslims hated Baldwin IV, wheras in the movie it makes it as if Saladin and Baldwin were friends
Posted on 11/3/08 at 8:44 pm to prplhze2000
King Kong- they one with Jessica Lange
you build a fortress to keep Kong out, but then you build a door big enough for a giant ape to walk through
you build a fortress to keep Kong out, but then you build a door big enough for a giant ape to walk through
Posted on 11/3/08 at 8:46 pm to TigerintheNO
Omg. I can't believe I never thought about the giant door in Kong. You correct sir. all they needed to do was build a normal door.
Posted on 11/3/08 at 9:00 pm to prplhze2000
as much as I still love it, the terminator. There's a possible explanation, but it's not what the movie shows us. How can John Connor send his dad back to bone his mom if his existence is reliant on the fact that he DID send is dad back in time. It's a paradox. And the only explanation is that kyle reese is not his fater, and his mom got knocked up by some other guy right before reese arrived.
also, fry is his own grandfather in futurama. How could they miss that one?
also, fry is his own grandfather in futurama. How could they miss that one?
Posted on 11/3/08 at 10:35 pm to iggle
Actually, Terminator resolves the paradox. T2 is the one with a paradox. See, in Terminator, John Connor send back Reese to bone his mom because that's what has always happened. You can't change the past. Reese always gets sent back, he always fails to destroy the Terminator, and he always fathers John Connor. Lather, rinse, repeat. It just always happens. Therefore, no paradox.
T2 causes a paradox because Judgment Day never happens, therefore the future doesn't happen, therfore Reese is never sent back in time by John connor, never impregnates his mom, John is never born, so no one is there to send back Reese to start the cycle.
However, my favorite historical innacuracy in a movie ever is in Braveheart that the Battle of Stirling Bridge doesn't have a bridge in it. Which is like having the invasion of Normandy with no beach landing.
T2 causes a paradox because Judgment Day never happens, therefore the future doesn't happen, therfore Reese is never sent back in time by John connor, never impregnates his mom, John is never born, so no one is there to send back Reese to start the cycle.
However, my favorite historical innacuracy in a movie ever is in Braveheart that the Battle of Stirling Bridge doesn't have a bridge in it. Which is like having the invasion of Normandy with no beach landing.
Posted on 11/4/08 at 12:36 am to tigerking765
quote:
Baldwin IV
Stephen
Posted on 11/4/08 at 12:54 am to tigerzeye
what if its purposely done?
History of the World Part I
"Talkamatta!! you can't talkamatta anything"!
History of the World Part I
"Talkamatta!! you can't talkamatta anything"!
Posted on 11/4/08 at 1:02 am to cene
Apocalypto had some historical inaccuracies.
Posted on 11/6/08 at 9:23 pm to Baloo
I disagree, it's still a paradox. Like I said, the very fact that john connor has to send his dad back to create himself makes it impossible unless reese isn't his dad. The only other way it's possible is if reese would have been sent back despite the existence of connor in the first place.
Think about it in the present tense. You're alive, but you have to send back some guy in time to father yourself to make sure you still exist. Can't happen.
Think about it in the present tense. You're alive, but you have to send back some guy in time to father yourself to make sure you still exist. Can't happen.
Posted on 11/6/08 at 10:20 pm to prplhze2000
quote:
3 military guys, on an unknown planet, so what do they do? get naked and go swimming. Ever heard of military discipline? Maybe going one at a time, leaving weapons and clothes unguarded?
Then there is the little matter of how he speaks the same language they do. Hmmmm...... think that might have been a huge clue to taylor?
Or the Statue of Liberty not falling apart by then It IS made of metal.
Electricity but no cars, plastics but housing is literally in the stone ages and everyone is on horseback......
or better yet, if the humans are dumb how do they have clothes?
Sounds like someone paid WAYYYY too much attention to detail as opposed to simply enjoying the movie for what it was...A MOVIE.
Posted on 11/7/08 at 8:51 am to SaintLSUnAtl
I listen to my coworkers bitch all the time about Top Gun and U-571.
Its funny to get them going.
Its funny to get them going.
Posted on 11/7/08 at 11:05 am to prplhze2000
For historical inaccuracies, Amadeus and Hurricane are the first that come to mind.
As far as plot holes, I'll go with Double Jeopardy (as far as my understanding of the law they were way off in the whole premise of that, but I could be wrong)
As far as plot holes, I'll go with Double Jeopardy (as far as my understanding of the law they were way off in the whole premise of that, but I could be wrong)
Posted on 11/7/08 at 12:27 pm to prplhze2000
quote:Not to the Scots.
Longshanks was actually a decent king.
Posted on 11/7/08 at 12:44 pm to rockchlkjayhku11
quote:
what are the plot holes in memento. i cant remember the movie too well.

Posted on 11/7/08 at 4:32 pm to lpd1975
Braveheart..
Timeline was all jacked up in that movie..
Timeline was all jacked up in that movie..
Posted on 11/7/08 at 6:33 pm to TheLittleAristotle
quote:
For historical inaccuracies, Amadeus
well, for what it's worth, they purposefully didn't try to make an accurate biography.
quote:
“From the start we (Milos and Shaffer) agreed on one thing: we were not making an objective Life of Wolfgang Mozart. This cannot be stressed too strongly. Obviously Amadeus on stage was never intended to be a documentary biography of the composer, and the film is even less of one.” – Peter Shaffer (playwright, Amadeus)
Posted on 11/8/08 at 12:47 pm to iggle
Invincible.
They forgot to mention that Papale was a college athlete, played in the WFL, and was invited to a private try-out with Vermeil.
They forgot to mention that Papale was a college athlete, played in the WFL, and was invited to a private try-out with Vermeil.
Posted on 11/8/08 at 2:03 pm to prplhze2000
here's a minor one that's sorta funny IMO
the robin hood movie costner made - they use a printing press
the robin hood movie costner made - they use a printing press
Popular
Back to top



1





