Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Would you pay $59,950 for this ugly thing? | Music Board
Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Would you pay $59,950 for this ugly thing?

Posted on 10/20/22 at 8:21 am
Posted by Tom Joad
Member since Sep 2021
192 posts
Posted on 10/20/22 at 8:21 am
even if I had money to throw away or burn I wouldn't


LINK



eta that the text indicates it was altered to get paid 3 times the rate. What a joke except I think it's for real that price.

Here's a 1951 Fender Nocaster converted in a "Payola" style. These guitars were built by recording studio/musicians in the early 1950's in order to get paid 3 times for one track, by going through 3 different amps at once.

This post was edited on 10/20/22 at 9:02 am
Posted by TheFretShack
Member since Oct 2015
1353 posts
Posted on 10/20/22 at 9:18 am to
I find it very, very hard to believe that a 1951 Fender would have such a clean, unstained layer of 70+ year old thin skin nitrocellulose lacquer atop a maple fingerboard if it was owned by a union member session player.

Meanwhile, a paper trail should exist or be relatively easy to obtain if this instrument was tied to a union, a member, his pay stubs/receipts to the union and from the studio(s). Zero provenance even mentioned in the ad.

Until then, I see a $599.50 parts donor Telecaster at best.
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
32134 posts
Posted on 10/20/22 at 10:22 am to
I opened this thread and got a good belly laugh. Thank you.

Would not buy.

quote:

in order to get paid 3 times for one track, by going through 3 different amps at once.


I don’t get this
This post was edited on 10/20/22 at 10:24 am
Posted by Telecaster
Memphis
Member since May 2017
2198 posts
Posted on 10/20/22 at 10:25 am to
Looks like an Ed Roman special.

Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
49487 posts
Posted on 10/20/22 at 5:23 pm to
No
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
63186 posts
Posted on 10/20/22 at 5:33 pm to
I was going to say "I'd need to run that by Fret Shack first," but I see you've already spoken.
Posted by nealnan8
Atlanta
Member since Oct 2016
4281 posts
Posted on 10/22/22 at 10:44 am to
Looks like something the Russian KGB would design for one of their spies, who's cover was a guitar player in a rock n' roll band in 1967, in the USA.
Posted by UKWildcats
Lexington, KY
Member since Mar 2015
19244 posts
Posted on 10/22/22 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

These guitars were built by recording studio/musicians in the early 1950's in order to get paid 3 times for one track, by going through 3 different amps at once.
Does anyone have the knowledge to elaborate? Interesting factoid I didn't know.
Posted by Stan Switek
Member since Apr 2017
474 posts
Posted on 10/22/22 at 6:31 pm to
Seeing as how the first studio multitrack wasn't created until 1957, and the technology wasn't in widespread studio use until the early 1960s or so (and only in the US, the rest of the world didn't get any of this until the mid to late 60s), seems pretty questionable.
Posted by L1C4
The Ville
Member since Aug 2017
16363 posts
Posted on 10/22/22 at 6:36 pm to
Let me call in a friend that knows a lot about guitars.
Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
31189 posts
Posted on 10/23/22 at 5:26 am to
Free Shipping though.
Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
31189 posts
Posted on 10/23/22 at 5:49 am to
quote:

Seeing as how the first studio multitrack wasn't created until 1957,

I think that would be the point of using a guitar like that, because they didn't have multitrack. 1 guitar player playing through 3 different amps from 3 different pick ups, to get the sound of 3 different guitar players all at the same time in the same room.
I don't know how well it would work, but I get the idea. I know I wouldn't want to rewire that thang.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram