- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 6/11/19 at 8:53 pm to NOSHAU
As I said in a previous thread.
We want Celtics package first.
Lakers and knicks were middle tier
If we aren’t able to find a third team, the lakers deal makes the most sense in terms of trade able assets.
We want Celtics package first.
Lakers and knicks were middle tier
If we aren’t able to find a third team, the lakers deal makes the most sense in terms of trade able assets.
Posted on 6/11/19 at 10:19 pm to CajunMD
quote:Is this what Griffin wants? If we want a Celtics package first, why would the Lakers deal make the most sense? Does he want a 3rd team even with a Celtics deal?
As I said in a previous thread.
We want Celtics package first.
Lakers and knicks were middle tier
If we aren’t able to find a third team, the lakers deal makes the most sense in terms of trade able assets.
Posted on 6/11/19 at 10:30 pm to NOSHAU
If it were me I’d aim for Tatum, Beal and some filler.
Posted on 6/11/19 at 10:31 pm to ColeLSU
Ingram/Tatum and Beal and it's over
It's over!
It's over!
Posted on 6/12/19 at 1:39 pm to NOSHAU
I’ll put it like this, as it’s my best way of explaining what I meant.
1. Griffin wants Celtics deal. He wants Tatum. Celtics won’t part with Tatum.
2. If the Celtics offer stands, it’s everything we want minus Tatum.
3. If we cannot find a third team to trade with, then the lakers package most likely suits what griffin wants..compared to the package of the Celtics.
So without a third team getting into the mix, we would likely take the Lakers deal over any, unless the Celtics either include Tatum or find a third team willing to give up hefty assets.
1. Griffin wants Celtics deal. He wants Tatum. Celtics won’t part with Tatum.
2. If the Celtics offer stands, it’s everything we want minus Tatum.
3. If we cannot find a third team to trade with, then the lakers package most likely suits what griffin wants..compared to the package of the Celtics.
So without a third team getting into the mix, we would likely take the Lakers deal over any, unless the Celtics either include Tatum or find a third team willing to give up hefty assets.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 1:42 pm to CajunMD
quote:
it’s everything we want minus Tatum.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 1:43 pm to CajunMD
quote:So, Ainge reneged on his promise to include Tatum? That does not sound like him.
I’ll put it like this, as it’s my best way of explaining what I meant.
1. Griffin wants Celtics deal. He wants Tatum. Celtics won’t part with Tatum.
2. If the Celtics offer stands, it’s everything we want minus Tatum.
3. If we cannot find a third team to trade with, then the lakers package most likely suits what griffin wants..compared to the package of the Celtics.
So without a third team getting into the mix, we would likely take the Lakers deal over any, unless the Celtics either include Tatum or find a third team willing to give up hefty assets.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 1:44 pm to CajunMD
The Celtics are playing hardball with Tatum. Hopefully, they give in and we can get this over with.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 1:44 pm to CajunMD
quote:How can that be? Supposedly we want an all-star, a player that has potential to be an all-star and multiple draft picks. Seems they would not be offering the first two items.
2. If the Celtics offer stands, it’s everything we want minus Tatum.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 1:45 pm to Mad Scientist26
The Celtics package is horrible without Tatum
Posted on 6/12/19 at 1:47 pm to Mad Scientist26
quote:If so, there is no deal to be made with Boston. It would be embarrassing to accept a deal centered around Hayward or Brown and a future pick.
The Celtics are playing hardball with Tatum. Hopefully, they give in and we can get this over with.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 1:47 pm to NOSHAU
Yeah, if no Tatum is true at all it’s almost like Ainge doesn’t really want to trade for AD.
This post was edited on 6/12/19 at 1:48 pm
Posted on 6/12/19 at 1:49 pm to TigerinATL
quote:If true, Griffin must just be trying to use the threat of the Celtics to get the Lakers to find a 3rd team with a real asset.
Yeah, if no Tatum is true at all it’s almost like Ainge doesn’t really want to trade for AD.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 1:54 pm to CajunMD
quote:
If the Celtics offer stands, it’s everything we want minus Tatum
so then its not what we want at all?
that would be like ordering a burger, they give it to you fully dressed but with no meat, and say well its everything you wanted.
This post was edited on 6/12/19 at 2:01 pm
Posted on 6/12/19 at 1:55 pm to NOSHAU
And CajunMD should not have posted this info publicly if he’s for real. Don’t give away our pretend leverage. You better be an alter making shite up. 
Posted on 6/12/19 at 2:04 pm to TigerinATL
I don't see how a celtics package that does not include tatum is better than the Lakers.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 2:06 pm to BilJ
It's not.
Page 6 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News