- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/17/25 at 1:31 pm to Townedrunkard
quote:
still don’t think that was a catch.
So it was a catch..
Posted on 12/17/25 at 5:57 pm to rt3
Great link to a shitty website. No actual video of the play. You suck op
Posted on 12/17/25 at 6:07 pm to Townedrunkard
It wasn't a catch. Refs and the WWNFLOL are stupid.
Posted on 12/17/25 at 6:08 pm to Snipe
The WWNFLOL is too stupid to hold the striped lemmings accountable. We had undebateable proof of this with the SHAMS no-call years ago.
Posted on 12/18/25 at 10:52 am to High Life
quote:
Great link to a shitty website. No actual video of the play. You suck op
And I thought every Saints fan knew the play I was talking about
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 12/18/25 at 1:47 pm to paulb52
I saw his hand come off the ball as he went out of bounds. Was an obvious incompletion to me.
Posted on 12/18/25 at 2:03 pm to rt3
They got the call right calling it not a catch. He used the ground to help palm the ball AFTER his other hand came off and it was CLEARLY fully contacting the ground (aka trapping the ball with the ground). fricking idiots. xD
This post was edited on 12/18/25 at 2:04 pm
Posted on 12/18/25 at 5:57 pm to rt3
If the ball hits the ground it should not be a catch , period.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 9:18 am to Septiger
quote:Would be the easiest way to rule things. Just say a catch is a ball that never contacts the ground (along with the other rules of a catch). Any contact automatically makes it not a catch.
If the ball hits the ground it should not be a catch , period.
I don't mind the current way so much though, but it was clear that he trapped the ball with the ground after his other hand came off. Not sure how trapping a ball could ever be a catch.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 9:21 am to bonethug0180
the explanation from the broadcast crew was that you cannot use the ground to secure the football. Even though it appeared that he maintained control with his top hand, he did so with the ground supporting the ball from underneath.
Posted on 12/19/25 at 12:18 pm to Vacherie Saint
It makes for a fun conversation because of how ridiculous the league’s rules are about “what is a catch”? The league has publicly stated when they missed similar plays in the past, yet remain completely silent and Florio is the only one running with it, that I’ve seen. So is the a legit issue, or another Florio article to get clicks for something that can’t be disproven
This post was edited on 12/19/25 at 12:20 pm
Posted on 12/20/25 at 7:19 am to rt3
I thought it was a catch until I rewatched with James Skrmetta, and yea even the top hand was moving. Clearly a no catch.
Popular
Back to top

0









