Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Saints gained 3.5+ million, a 4th, 5th, future 6th rd picks today | Page 3 | Saints Talk
Started By
Message

re: Saints gained 3.5+ million, a 4th, 5th, future 6th rd picks today

Posted on 11/4/25 at 5:41 pm to
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
177346 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 5:41 pm to
Nope. We are unleashing Vele.
Posted by DJ3K
Member since Dec 2011
7449 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 6:38 pm to
quote:

sure but even at a 15 million 1 yr deal, that's pretty below a FA Market demand for a replacement caliber player.
they have Polk locked up on his rookie deal and they can draft a big bodied WR in the 2nd

saints are gonna move to a run oriented team anyway. they should sign Breece Hall and Isaiah Likely
Posted by TheOldMan
Red Stick
Member since Sep 2022
697 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 6:50 pm to
As long as Loomis is there, the Saints will be sucking hind tit.
Posted by jrobic4
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
12846 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

Loomis has all the money in the world to make some big splashes.


What a horrifying prospect!
Posted by Bayou
Boudin, LA
Member since Feb 2005
42255 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

And yet people will bitch. Loomis needs to go but it was a good day

Very excited for late round draft picks for our best player
NOT
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
14454 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

Does that count the 4th they gave away for vele. You gave shaheed away for a 5th after the vele trade.


It’s worse than that. Those 4th round picks will be on opposite sides of the 4th round. It will cost at least that 5th to move up to the top of the 4th where Denver will be picking with our pick….

This post was edited on 11/4/25 at 8:04 pm
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
177346 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:04 pm to
It’s almost like we have a player for that 4th round pick. fricking dimwit.
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
14454 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:07 pm to
quote:

It’s almost like we have a player for that 4th round pick. fricking dimwit.


And we could have been drafting two in the 4th round like this year…

Two guys that actually look promising in their early 20’s….

So your point?
This post was edited on 11/4/25 at 8:08 pm
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
177346 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:10 pm to
quote:

Two guys that actually look promising in their early 20’s….


We did better
Posted by SEC Doctor
Member since Aug 2024
12226 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

a 4th, 5th, future 6th rd picks


Couldn't the Saints have kept the players and gotten a 4th and a 5th as compensatory picks?
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
177346 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

Couldn't the Saints have kept the players and gotten a 4th and a 5th as compensatory picks?


No. Not if we signed guys in free agency that cancelled them in the formula
Posted by Thracken13
Aft Cargo Hold of Serenity
Member since Feb 2010
18713 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:17 pm to
Shouldn't matter to you either way since you walked away from being a fan of the team and the nfl during the kneeling stuff
Posted by Chalkywhite84
New orleans
Member since Dec 2016
34223 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:22 pm to
quote:

Two guys that actually look promising in their early 20’s….


We did better


How did you do better loomis jr?
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
14454 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:31 pm to
quote:

We did better


Nah, from what I’ve seen, would much prefer our pick back. I’m sure everyone here but you would. Think Denver makes that trade again?

We essentially traded Shaheed for Vele straight up b/c Loomis has fricked our cap situation up so bad we couldn’t afford to pay him.

If you think that was a good trade talent wise and we upgraded our team, not much I can argue because you are beyond hope.
This post was edited on 11/4/25 at 8:34 pm
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
121320 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:33 pm to
Wait, so now you’re against acquiring more picks? Explain
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
177346 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:35 pm to
You keep regurgitating your pussy arse fricking opinion. Shut the frick up bro.
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
14454 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:37 pm to
quote:

Wait, so now you’re against acquiring more picks? Explain


Would you trade Shaheed straight up for Vele? That’s what we did.

The situation Loomis put us in, and Olaves current contract situation, he had to trade him.
This post was edited on 11/4/25 at 8:38 pm
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
121320 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:37 pm to
Ok, that didn’t address my question.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
177346 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:39 pm to
quote:

Would you trade Shaheed straight up for Vele? That’s what we did


No it’s not. We would have had to pay sheed 15-20 mill a year to keep him on the roster for next 2 years while we have Vele for cap cheap. You’re so fricking stupid bro.
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
14454 posts
Posted on 11/4/25 at 8:41 pm to
I’m the guy that said to let all of our free agents walk (JJ, Chase) don’t sign anyone in free agency other than vet min guys on prove it one year deals, just so we could get comp picks and get all of our dead money off the cap.

So what do u think?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram