Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us El Paso Walmart mass shooting - now 22 dead | Page 67 | O-T Lounge
Started By
Message

re: El Paso Walmart mass shooting - now 22 dead

Posted on 8/4/19 at 12:29 am to
Posted by Tigerbait357
Member since Jun 2011
70854 posts
Posted on 8/4/19 at 12:29 am to
quote:

You seem pretty steadfast defending those two racists.




Good lord

He has not defended any racist you idiot
This post was edited on 8/4/19 at 12:35 am
Posted by Tyga Woods
South Central Jupiter Island, FL
Member since Sep 2016
41916 posts
Posted on 8/4/19 at 12:33 am to
quote:

Keep making farks

I don’t know how to do that

quote:

You seem pretty steadfast defending those two racists.

I haven’t defended any racist

quote:

Your defense of trump is odd

I don’t even really like him that much but I’ll defend anyone that is being falsely accused or labeled without any facts to back it up. I defended Obama plenty of times and I didn’t even vote for him.
This post was edited on 8/4/19 at 12:34 am
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
66950 posts
Posted on 8/4/19 at 12:41 am to
Why do you anti-Trumpers always bring up racism? When we hear that "Whites are evil, whites are the problem, etc." How is this not considered racist, in of itself?
My family is all white, yet we have had a black, virtually homeless, friend live with us, since this person had literally no where else to go. Yet, people like you want to label people like my family as "evil", etc, based solely on the color of our skin.
If we really want to end racism in this country, we must end the lack of trust between the races. Many laws, etc. are in place to assist (and rightfully so, IMO) minorities and not being left out of opportunity. Yet, whites won't trust some other races, primarily, IMO, due to crime.
I can almost guarantee if crime is drastically reduced to the levels rural America, this country would no longer have a race problem.
To resolve this, is to not spew rhetoric about "Anti- whites", etc. but to start with your own family and teach your children right from wrong, respect of family, friends, teachers, bosses, etc.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
37943 posts
Posted on 8/4/19 at 12:49 am to
quote:

Instead of attacking me, let’s get back to original post
In other words, "I've been thoroughly and unmercifully destroyed".
Posted by Sanfordhog
Tennessee
Member since Jan 2016
479 posts
Posted on 8/4/19 at 12:53 am to
Well, we’ve established I think the El Paso shooter is a racist POS. Also, I believe the shooter, based on his manifesto supported trump and his anti immigrant views were emboldened by Trump’s rhetoric.

Destroyed by KKK, yes. They’ll never understand my POV.
This post was edited on 8/4/19 at 1:02 am
Posted by WinnPtiger
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2011
24969 posts
Posted on 8/4/19 at 12:56 am to
quote:

if I can find 10 uses of a relationship between the term "culcha/black" and "Democrat" on here you'll venmo/PayPal me $50? I'll happily take that bet. I'm being serious.



90% of culcha has voted for one party their entire lives with nothing to show for it
Posted by Tigerbait357
Member since Jun 2011
70854 posts
Posted on 8/4/19 at 12:57 am to
quote:

Well we’ve established I think the El Paso shooter is a racist POS. Also, I believe the shooter, based on his manifesto, is supported trump and was emboldened by Trump’s rhetoric.




Posted by Tyga Woods
South Central Jupiter Island, FL
Member since Sep 2016
41916 posts
Posted on 8/4/19 at 12:58 am to
quote:

Destroyed by KKK, yes.


Holy shite
Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
37943 posts
Posted on 8/4/19 at 1:01 am to
quote:

We’ll we’ve established I think the El Paso is a racist POS.
Has anyone in the thread expressed otherwise?
quote:

I believe the shooter, based on his manifesto, supported trump and was emboldened by Trump’s rhetoric.

And you believe this despite the fact that the shooter claims that his radical beliefs predate the rise of Trump. You have continued to tout his alleged manifesto as proof that Trump is somehow responsible, yet the manifesto itself disputes you, and half of his beliefs are pretty leftist. For example, he also cast UBI in a positive light. Is Andrew Yang also responsible?
Posted by Tyga Woods
South Central Jupiter Island, FL
Member since Sep 2016
41916 posts
Posted on 8/4/19 at 1:03 am to
quote:

For example, he also cast UBI in a positive light. Is Andrew Yang also responsible?



He’s going to have to find a MSNBC clip to tell him how he should feel about that
Posted by Bigbee Hills
Member since Feb 2019
1531 posts
Posted on 8/4/19 at 1:05 am to
quote:

See the part about the militia?


This take, my take, on your severely flawed understanding will destroy your theory, but only if you are a reasonable, thinking man who's true to yourself and the realization that you hate your country's founding principles- principles that've given you all the good in this American life that you know. If you are a thinking man, an honest man, then you'll at least read it and give the retort to your particular argument its due process.

See the part about the "Bill of Rights"? See the part on the Bill of Military Rights?

Still looking?

Didn't think so. Because it's not there.

A military's- any military's- rights are assumed, and they are written in stone as clear as the sky is blue and mankind knows it across all of history: "We the well regulated Military, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the soldiers to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

That is a GIVEN, is it not?

Is. It. Not? Should a battlefield chock full of soldiers be given their right to bear arms to preserve their country? Say?

WHY-tell me, my fellow countryman- why on EARTH are a military's inalienable rights to be spelled out in the same Bill of Rights that gives only civilian rights: freedom of religion, protection of rights to life, liberty, and property, rights in civil cases (7th amendment) etc.?

Tell me, what does that all have to do with a general and his army?

This is your logic: That the founding fathers decided to throw in an already INALIENABLE MILITARY RIGHT in and amongst a slew of other individual, revolutionary-for-the-time-and-now rights pertaining to CIVILIANS.

Does that sound logical to you? If you were the founding fathers, would this seem logical to you? Pertinent, even?

If you are a logical man, you'd say, "No."

The fact is, the Bill of Rights was written for the common man- the civilian man- and not for a military man.

The BILL OF RIGHTS, pertaining to the constitutional rights that those like you hate so much in part, is directed at the Bill of Rights for the people. There is no Bill of Rights for the militia.

Be honest and not a liar and man up and say that you hate it in part so that we can all get down to the fact of the matter. You know the truth and you hate it and that is the crux of your problem: You are not being true to thy self.

That weakness that you possess is the strength of those like myself who support the Bill of Civilian Rights and the strength that we have over those sheeple like you, and for that, we the freethinking people win for yet another day: We are principled in full, and that is a noble thing, whether we like all the results or not.
Posted by The Dudes Rug
Member since Nov 2004
14064 posts
Posted on 8/4/19 at 1:06 am to
quote:

Also, I believe the shooter, based on his manifesto, is supported trump and was emboldened by Trump’s rhetoric


You should've said "his perception" of Trump's rhetoric. Nothing our president has ever done or said promotes killing innocent people.

It's sad to see so many people standing on the graves of dead people to push their political opinions and claim our president as the scapegoat.
Posted by Aristo
Colorado
Member since Jan 2007
13292 posts
Posted on 8/4/19 at 1:09 am to
You could not post a more perfect "jif"
Posted by Sanfordhog
Tennessee
Member since Jan 2016
479 posts
Posted on 8/4/19 at 1:12 am to
Yes. Many times.

Shooter personally confirmed he was anti immigration. He blamed shooting on immigrants, literally said so in his manifesto. He said it wasn’t his fault but a result of immigrants action.
This post was edited on 8/4/19 at 1:13 am
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62927 posts
Posted on 8/4/19 at 1:13 am to
quote:

Instead of attacking me,
you've done nothing but falsely accuse people of being racists in this thread.
Posted by Tyga Woods
South Central Jupiter Island, FL
Member since Sep 2016
41916 posts
Posted on 8/4/19 at 1:17 am to
quote:

Shooter personally confirmed he was anti immigration. He blamed shooting on immigrants, literally said so in his manifesto.


Nobody is disputing this. Nobody.
You can’t blame Trump, or anyone else, for the actions of this guy.
Posted by The Dudes Rug
Member since Nov 2004
14064 posts
Posted on 8/4/19 at 1:22 am to
quote:

Shooter personally confirmed he was anti immigration. He blamed shooting on immigrants, literally said so in his manifesto. He said it wasn’t his fault but a result of immigrants action.



Let's pretend all of this is true..it still has nothing to do with Trump.
Posted by Sanfordhog
Tennessee
Member since Jan 2016
479 posts
Posted on 8/4/19 at 1:22 am to
I wouldn’t say falsely. IMO, they’ve pretty much confirmed they’re racist by their responses to my comments and those defenses of racists.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
37943 posts
Posted on 8/4/19 at 1:22 am to
quote:

Shooter personally confirmed he was anti immigration.
That's not an exclusively Trumper belief and it's not inherently racist, either. I do enjoy how y'all continue to frame it as "anti-immigration" when it's really "anti-illegal alien". Enjoy that Trump win in 2020. It will be your fault.
Posted by Tigerbait357
Member since Jun 2011
70854 posts
Posted on 8/4/19 at 1:24 am to
quote:

wouldn’t say falsely. IMO, they’ve pretty much confirmed they’re racist by their responses





People called you out because you posted partial quotes of Trump out of context to blame this mass shooting on him. You get mad and then call everyone racist because of it. Then you go on to insinuate that all these people in this thread are defending the shooter (complete BS). Now you want people to not attack you?


This post was edited on 8/4/19 at 1:28 am
Jump to page
Page First 65 66 67 68 69 ... 75
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 67 of 75Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram