Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us ICBM Nuclear Missiles | Page 5 | O-T Lounge
Started By
Message

re: ICBM Nuclear Missiles

Posted on 4/28/25 at 4:00 pm to
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
19079 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 4:00 pm to
quote:


Not with a 100% success rate


I have heard this nonsense since the early 2000s



Keep believing everything they tell you.
Posted by HeadCall
Member since Feb 2025
5715 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 4:00 pm to
What exactly do you think they’re going to shoot down all these missiles with?
Posted by Harry Boutte
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2024
3989 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

People say this but how do we know this is a fact?

We found out the hard way that AK-47s worked just fine in the jungle - the M16, not so much.
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
19079 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 4:02 pm to
quote:


What exactly do you think they’re going to shoot down all these missiles with?


Dunno.

Ill say this, yall worry a lot about rockets and missiles and shite being shot from the ground or ships etc.

Look up. We can do damage from above.

Theres a ton of stuff they hold back from us, a ton.




The greatest trick the devil ever played with convincing everyone he didnt exist.

Same goes for the United States Military.

its the most ratcheted down description of a military you can get every time they discuss it. As a matter of fact every time our military is discussed its how CHina and Russia are so close to us. LOL.

Literally textbook propaganda.
This post was edited on 4/28/25 at 4:04 pm
Posted by HeadCall
Member since Feb 2025
5715 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 4:03 pm to
You watch too many movies
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
19079 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 4:04 pm to
quote:


You watch too many movies


Ok.
Posted by ole man
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
17441 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 4:06 pm to
7 downvoters that have never lister to her. You can rest assured they’re some on both sides itching to press a button
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
87092 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

Hoenstly if it hits D.C. directly, I wouldnt be that upset.

As long as the president and stuff were away, I wouldnt shed one tear.

It would probably solve more problems that create at this point.


Posted by Tantal
Member since Sep 2012
19565 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

Who would want to survive.

Yeah, I think I'd rather take the direct hit. Pretty painless way to go really.
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
19079 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 4:12 pm to
quote:


quote:
Hoenstly if it hits D.C. directly, I wouldnt be that upset.

As long as the president and stuff were away, I wouldnt shed one tear.

It would probably solve more problems that create at this point.





Heres the thing, as soon as I realized the left literally doesnt like white people I decided that I dont care what happens to anyone on the left, their states, schools, etc. I hope they all go bankrupt and end up completely poor and strung out on drugs so they are easier to control later on.

And I hope they keep making education a non factor so its easier for my offspring to manipulate theirs.
This post was edited on 4/28/25 at 4:13 pm
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
72761 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

I’d imagine the vast majority of those with Ukraine flags in their profile are in the same boat as you were until last night.


quote:

I would bet it's the ones who think Putin isn't a threat that are in the same boat he was in. Putin is a threat to Ukraine, Putin is a threat to Europe, and Putin is a threat to us. Ukraine, OTOH, is a threat to no one.



The only people who don’t take the threat of Putin seriously are the ones wanting to get us more and more involved in his war with Ukraine.
Posted by Fenster
Member since Mar 2008
897 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 4:48 pm to
The doomsday machine has no off switch.


Yall watch too many missions impossible.
Posted by DemonKA3268
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2015
21180 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 5:00 pm to
Great thing is there is absolutely nothing we can do about it. Live life, if it happens, it happens.

When/if, doesn’t matter. If it does, life for us is over, period.
Posted by tokenBoiler
Lafayette, Indiana
Member since Aug 2012
5014 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

MAD - Mutually Assured Destruction.
It may not be the best possible way, but I'm convinced that Curtis LeMay and his Soviet counterpart deserve a lot of credit for keeping the world intact. (so far)

And I get a little more nervous every time somebody mentions tactical nukes or graded responses or similar.
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
19468 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 6:25 pm to
quote:

Russia can send over a nuclear ICBM and hit DC in less than 24 minutes
.

What year is it? :gif:

ICBMs have been able to travel between US and Russia in about 30 minutes since the 1960's.

And if you want to get really worried, they can hit us in about 10 minutes if they have submarines close by. This is why submarine tracking and steatlh was just a big part of Cold War.
Posted by hansenthered1
Dixie
Member since Nov 2023
2638 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 6:29 pm to
Did people forget that the Russians had ICBMs or did they think they would take an hour or so to hit? I mean this weapon was the center of the cold war for like 60 years and we somehow forget how they work?

Honestly, Americans have become spoiled and soft. Think the ICBM is quick, look into their sub based missiles and get back to us. It's more like 10 to 15 min btw and they have quite a few subs locked and loaded.

This is why Biden was so dumb to play chicken over Ukraine. Putting the US into the kill chain could have "blown" up in our faces real quick.

Of course we have our own subs and we have good people ready right now to give it back to them.

This always stood out to me as a movie moment, we shoot first here that's why it takes so long to get it back from them

This post was edited on 4/28/25 at 6:31 pm
Posted by TygerLyfe
Member since May 2023
3358 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 8:21 pm to
Next, the OP will tell us he just discovered there's a B-52.
Posted by Juan Betanzos
New Orleans
Member since Nov 2005
4133 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 8:54 pm to
The difference is, some of their silos will not work efficiently—- as opposed to 60 years ago. Commies used to spend 80% of their money on military. Not anymore. Maintenance standards have plummeted
Posted by Coach72
Lafayette
Member since Dec 2009
1730 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 9:13 pm to
Posted by Tree_Fall
Member since Mar 2021
1159 posts
Posted on 4/28/25 at 9:17 pm to
US submarines have missiles with 12 independently targeted warheads. 50 years ago, locating subs was too imprecise for us or the Russians to hit one with a 1st-strike attack making them the defense "ace in the hole". You have to assume that is no longer the case.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram