- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is the hydroxyclorquine working or not?
Posted on 4/10/20 at 10:21 am to Lsut81
Posted on 4/10/20 at 10:21 am to Lsut81
Fauci heads up info for infectious diseases to the White House and has done so for generations. Comparing him to Dr. Oz is just dumb.
Oz actively promotes complete and total bullshite. He uses his MD to dupe his following and to act as if is a medical authority.
Oz actively promotes complete and total bullshite. He uses his MD to dupe his following and to act as if is a medical authority.
Posted on 4/10/20 at 10:31 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Fauci is a fraud,
quote:
Dude needs to stop talking
quote:
"The American people should not be worried or frightened by this. It's a very, very low risk to the United States," Dr. Fauci said on The CATS Roundtable. "It isn't something that the American public needs to worry about or be frightened about."
Did you say Trump is a fraud and needed to stop talking when he said the exact same thing?
Posted on 4/10/20 at 10:34 am to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
Like other have said, the silence around the trials speaks volumes about its effectiveness.
No it doesn’t
The trials aren’t finished. You don’t publish your data before you’ve analyzed it.
Posted on 4/10/20 at 11:09 am to cwil177
quote:
No it doesn’t
The trials aren’t finished. You don’t publish your data before you’ve analyzed it.
Correct. Unless that data is pointing to OMB then all bets are off.
I am confident these trials are showing good to great promise and what we will hear at the end is "more study is needed before a definitive indication can be made" or something along those lines.
How many hundreds or thousand anecdotal results make a study? There are many people very ill getting it and getting well. There are many people very ill not getting it and dying. Hell, now there are even a few democrats admitting the drug saved them.
Posted on 4/10/20 at 7:31 pm to GaDawg9977
quote:Go check how the CDC estimates flu deaths when only a minuscule number of flu patients are ever tested.
How so? Killed fewer than flu.
Posted on 4/10/20 at 7:36 pm to Menji
quote:You have a link to updated study?
The original French study kept going, and HCQ+azithromycin has a 99.3% success rate with resolved cases,
Posted on 4/10/20 at 7:47 pm to cwil177
So should or shouldn't I put my life savings into the companies that manufactures this drug
Posted on 4/10/20 at 8:14 pm to tigerinthebueche
quote:The 2mil model was based on China stats, and assumed that there was zero mitigation.
The vaunted “Models” revised DOWN to 60,000 deaths. (From 2 million!!.) I don’t think they’re idiots for their thoughts. I think the idiots are the ones who bought into the hype and hysteria
The IHME study says 60,000 going only through August 4.
Seems like with your tenuous grap of the facts, you should be more careful of calling others idiots.
Posted on 4/10/20 at 8:16 pm to notiger1997
Maybe is the correct answer.
It works for some
It works for some
Posted on 4/10/20 at 8:27 pm to The Shed
Don’t care
Methylene Blue that’s what you want
Methylene Blue that’s what you want
Posted on 4/10/20 at 8:31 pm to texridder
quote:
The 2mil model was based on China stats, and assumed that there was zero mitigation.
This isn’t true
Posted on 4/10/20 at 8:34 pm to texridder
If you put China in any debate you just lost the debate there is nothing definitive about that shitbag country that anyone can validate to be true. You lose.
Posted on 4/10/20 at 8:37 pm to The Shed
quote:
Is the hydroxyclorquine working or not?
For the millionth time, yes.
Future threads like this need an anchor.
Posted on 4/10/20 at 8:38 pm to The Shed
Drink Canada Dry tonic water
and take your Zinc
and take your Zinc
Posted on 4/10/20 at 8:49 pm to Cracker
quote:
If you put China in any debate you just lost the debate there is nothing definitive about that shitbag country that anyone can validate to be true. You lose.
I didn't put China in any debate, dumbass. I simply pointed out that the Imperial study used the China stats in its model.
Posted on 4/10/20 at 8:52 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
The 2mil model was based on China stats, and assumed that there was zero mitigation.
quote:
This isn’t true
Why would anyone post 'It isn't true' without saying what about it isn't true?
Why don't you try again?
Posted on 4/10/20 at 9:13 pm to texridder
quote:
what about it isn't true?
All of it.
Posted on 4/11/20 at 10:53 pm to Python
quote:
The 2mil model was based on China stats, and assumed that there was zero mitigation.
what about it isn't true?
quote:
All of it.
Ignorant response.
Here, why don't you educate yourself.
Imperial College Study
Posted on 4/12/20 at 5:17 am to Parmen
quote:
For the millionth time, yes.
Link?
Posted on 4/12/20 at 5:50 am to texridder
I believe Zero out of China.... I believe if they had a cure, and they may have it they won't let the world know. it was created there, they gonna take care of their own 1st, so what if they lose a few million people. the leaders of the CCP won't get it, they wont to rule the world , that's what they do
Popular
Back to top



0





