- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Madison Brooks' Dad Lawsuit
Posted on 9/20/23 at 1:39 pm to Weekend Warrior79
Posted on 9/20/23 at 1:39 pm to Weekend Warrior79
Because they have not been convicted.
1
Posted on 9/20/23 at 1:43 pm to boosiebadazz
Has it been proven in a court of law that Reggie's was the where she had her drinks? Is there the proof that the Lyft driver did in fact strike and kill her?
Sure the evidence is all there to call out Reggies & the driver; but at the same time the evidence is out there that those attackers raped her. Hell, isn't there a statement on record from one of the people in the car admitting to it?
Sure the evidence is all there to call out Reggies & the driver; but at the same time the evidence is out there that those attackers raped her. Hell, isn't there a statement on record from one of the people in the car admitting to it?
Posted on 9/20/23 at 1:43 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
That doesn't answer why some kid bartending on the patio should be sued for serving a girl with a wristband on.
Madison worked at Reggie's at one point. It's a good chance she got a wristband from the person at the door because she knew them and if not just them, the bartenders would serve someone they knew.
Posted on 9/20/23 at 2:10 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
Not that I am against fake ID's,
It worked for McLovin
Posted on 9/20/23 at 2:12 pm to KamaCausey_LSU
quote:
Prove it beyond all reasonable doubt
quote:
I don't think the threshold for civil cases is "beyond all reasonable doubt".
Thank you.. That's been bugging me this whole thread. Civil cases are a "preponderance of the evidence".
Posted on 9/20/23 at 2:12 pm to tgrbaitn08
quote:
Drinking age is 18 in Louisiana if you’re with a legal guardian
Does this exception apply to a bar or restaurant or just at personal residence?
This post was edited on 9/20/23 at 2:16 pm
Posted on 9/20/23 at 2:13 pm to JDPndahizzy
quote:
Madison Brooks' father is suing virtually everyone involved in his daughter's death,
Good.....hope he shoots them after he gets paid.
Posted on 9/20/23 at 2:16 pm to JDPndahizzy
Imagine this was your daughter
What would you do?
What would you do?
Posted on 9/20/23 at 2:18 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:
If I sued everybody it would have still been the state paying for my medical bills dumbass.
I don't have a dog in this race but I don't understand this statement. When someone files a PI lawsuit, medical expenses are definitely part of the damages, along with lost wages, etc... The defendant (insurer) would be on the hook for that, not the state. Unless I'm totally missing something. Which wouldn't surprise me
Posted on 9/20/23 at 2:20 pm to Covingtontiger77
quote:
Does this exception apply to a bar or restaurant or just at personal residence?
All of the above but 18 year old is not allowed to purchase the alcohol him/her self
Posted on 9/20/23 at 2:21 pm to tgrbaitn08
quote:
All of the above but 18 year old is not allowed to purchase the alcohol him/her self
Good ol' Louisiana law..
Posted on 9/20/23 at 2:26 pm to Weekend Warrior79
quote:
Has it been proven in a court of law that Reggie's was the where she had her drinks? Is there the proof that the Lyft driver did in fact strike and kill her?
That's what this suit is about. All of this will come out.
Posted on 9/20/23 at 2:34 pm to JDPndahizzy
This question was in response to my questioning why only the attackers are getting the "allegedly" treatment but not Reggie's or the Lyft driver. Bosie then responded with the attackers get the allegedly because they have not been convicted (which is true).
So, I asked:
So, I asked:
quote:
Has it been proven in a court of law that Reggie's was the where she had her drinks? Is there the proof that the Lyft driver did in fact strike and kill her?
Posted on 9/20/23 at 2:36 pm to BilbeauTBaggins
quote:
Madison worked at Reggie's at one point. It's a good chance she got a wristband from the person at the door because she knew them and if not just them, the bartenders would serve someone they knew.
Reggie's said that she used a fake ID to enter, which should be pretty easy to prove or disprove. I remember reading that she worked there for a very short period of time. Even if that is true, it's not a requirement that you know the age of every coworker. I don't know how you find 10+ people that work at the bar that should be sued for what happened that night.
This post was edited on 9/20/23 at 2:38 pm
Posted on 9/20/23 at 2:42 pm to JDPndahizzy
McLovin is 42, damn I’m getting old!
Posted on 9/20/23 at 2:42 pm to Weekend Warrior79
quote:
Weekend Warrior79
Gotcha!
Posted on 9/20/23 at 2:43 pm to tgrbaitn08
quote:
Drinking age is 18 in Louisiana if you’re with a legal guardian
quote:
Does this exception apply to a bar or restaurant or just at personal residence?
quote:
All of the above…
The MIP law contradicts this.
LINK
This post was edited on 9/20/23 at 2:44 pm
Posted on 9/20/23 at 2:58 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
Reggie's said that she used a fake ID to enter, which should be pretty easy to prove or disprove. I remember reading that she worked there for a very short period of time. Even if that is true, it's not a requirement that you know the age of every coworker. I don't know how you find 10+ people that work at the bar that should be sued for what happened that night.
Negligence is not an excuse, especially when the result leads to the death of an individual. If all the bouncer did was look at the ID and make sure the picture was accurate, that's not enough. IDs come with hidden markings to ensure that they're not easily duplicated. There's even more scrutiny against Reggie's based on their reputation.
Ivar's has ID scanners. I'm not sure exactly what the machines do, but it's definitely a lot more than just a quick scan of the DOB and photo. At my old job, I ran a fake ID through our scanner and it pulled up exactly the info that was listed on the card. I did every single thing I had to make sure I covered my arse in the event of something happening. Cameras watch us to make sure we did every preventative measure. If a good fake got passed us with the system we had in place, there wasn't more we could do except deny service based on what we felt was not a safe situation.
Again, the negligence falls upon the procedure of them checking IDs, which I can guess with 99% certainty that Reggie's hardly did the bare minimum.
Posted on 9/20/23 at 3:02 pm to MikeBRLA
The full statue states the exemption in which you can have possession of an alcohol beverage if you're accompanied by a parent/legal guardian.
What you posted is just what happens if someone under 21 has possession of alcohol outside of their listed exemptions.
What you posted is just what happens if someone under 21 has possession of alcohol outside of their listed exemptions.
Posted on 9/20/23 at 3:05 pm to BilbeauTBaggins
quote:
Negligence is not an excuse, especially when the result leads to the death of an individual. If all the bouncer did was look at the ID and make sure the picture was accurate, that's not enough. IDs come with hidden markings to ensure that they're not easily duplicated. There's even more scrutiny against Reggie's based on their reputation.
Reggie's has ID scanners too, as does every Tigerland bar. Fake ID's now a days are made specifically to pass those scanners.
quote:
Ivar's has ID scanners. I'm not sure exactly what the machines do, but it's definitely a lot more than just a quick scan of the DOB and photo. At my old job, I ran a fake ID through our scanner and it pulled up exactly the info that was listed on the card. I did every single thing I had to make sure I covered my arse in the event of something happening. Cameras watch us to make sure we did every preventative measure. If a good fake got passed us with the system we had in place, there wasn't more we could do except deny service based on what we felt was not a safe situation.
So you just admitted that scanners, like the one's that are used at Reggie's and other bars, can be manipulated and at not 100% fool proof?
quote:
Again, the negligence falls upon the procedure of them checking IDs, which I can guess with 99% certainty that Reggie's hardly did the bare minimum.
When is the last time you went to Reggie's that you can say this with 99% certainty?
But let's say for some reason you are right. Let's say that the bouncer for some reason didn't use the scanner and just gave her a wristband. How does that mean that 9 other workers should also be sued?
This post was edited on 9/20/23 at 3:12 pm
Page 17 of 22
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News