- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Marine Corps eyes gender-integrated basic training
Posted on 12/17/19 at 12:32 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
Posted on 12/17/19 at 12:32 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
We need a good war to put all these “strong women” on the front lines to prove they can do it.
Posted on 12/17/19 at 12:34 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
If women can talk-the-talk and walk-the-walk about gender equality, and prove it on the front line with the other Marines. I’m good with it.
Now. If they want “special” training, different from the men, then I don’t want them on the field at all fighting for us.
Now. If they want “special” training, different from the men, then I don’t want them on the field at all fighting for us.
Posted on 12/17/19 at 12:39 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
quote:
Hasn’t seemed to be that way for the Army.
Army is not the Marines. We have been archaic for a long time. That is because the vast majority want it that way. Marines are the nostalgic brand of what American military is. Otherwise we would have been mixed-gender long ago. As long as we vocalize that standards should never change, they can continue to test it and fail.
Posted on 12/17/19 at 12:43 pm to Montezuma
quote:
We have been archaic for a long time. That is because the vast majority want it that way.
I know, and I want it kept that way.
quote:
As long as we vocalize that standards should never change, they can continue to test it and fail.
Why should we continue to waste resources and have a woman take a slot that a man should have in training when the woman is 99.9% more likely to fail than the man. It makes no sense.
Posted on 12/17/19 at 12:45 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
quote:
Why do you tell your children no? Because it’s for their own good, right? And you don’t relent on that stance.
It’s the same thing with these children, you tell them no and keep that stance no matter how much they gnash their teeth and throw a tantrum. You’re the expert, not them.
Not really a good analogy for this situation. Who is the parent? Who is the child? The only ones saying no are those who apparently do not have the power to enforce it.
Work with what you have to make it work for you, not what you wish you could have.
Posted on 12/17/19 at 12:47 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
The British, Libyans, Mexicans, Cubans, Germans, Japanese, Koreans, Chinese, Vietnamese, Iraqis, Afghans, have all been unable to defeat one of the world's smallest fighting forces - average strength of 3 ground Divisions with 3 air wings thrown in, total manpower averaraging about 175,000. There are women that want to belong to this organization and have something to offer in medical, administrative, technical, and logistics support, and that is helpful to the organization.
Integration into the real reason for the existence of the Marine Corps would destroy its effectiveness. The conversation is not about what could be gained by the Corps in adding females to the rifle companies and supporting ground forces. It's about people who are excluded from that service due to strength, musculature, speed, courage, willingness to destroy and kill at great personal risk having a desire to say that they are Marines. They are dependent on the belief that these missing qualities can be legislated into existence,
Integration into the real reason for the existence of the Marine Corps would destroy its effectiveness. The conversation is not about what could be gained by the Corps in adding females to the rifle companies and supporting ground forces. It's about people who are excluded from that service due to strength, musculature, speed, courage, willingness to destroy and kill at great personal risk having a desire to say that they are Marines. They are dependent on the belief that these missing qualities can be legislated into existence,
This post was edited on 12/17/19 at 12:51 pm
Posted on 12/17/19 at 12:48 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
quote:
Why should we continue to waste resources and have a woman take a slot that a man should have in training when the woman is 99.9% more likely to fail than the man. It makes no sense.
I don't disagree at all. The vocal minority pull this from time to time. Jump in the parapet and defend until they go away. At some point the over-progressiveness will subside, or they will find some other shiny object to go for.
Posted on 12/17/19 at 1:30 pm to Korin
The facts didn’t fit the agenda.
So out went the facts.
So out went the facts.
Posted on 12/17/19 at 1:35 pm to Bard
quote:
This incrementalism is going to keep increasing unless you come up with a better idea than just saying "no". You either have to channel it into a less destructive direction or you will continue to get slowly eaten alive from the inside.
Two thoughts.
Women in combat arms is a red line we can’t cross.
Doing so will compromise the Marines as a fighting force.
Compromises will not appease feminist critics. They will continue to push for more, until the Marines are fully integrated, at whatever gender ratio the Pentagon sets.
The best option is to given zero ground. And hold the line. For as long as possible.
quote:
Give them a path but do not lessen the requirements (and have brass willing to stick to those requirements) and frame it as "competing on a man's level
That won’t work.
Look at what happened with the Green Berets. Big Army wanted a woman to pass the training course.
And so she “passed.”
Proponents of gender integration won’t let the policy fail. They would pay a serious political price.
So, as we’ve seen again and again, the standards will be adjusted till “enough” candidates make it through.
And they will drop the standards as low as they have to go, to ensure policy “success.”
This post was edited on 12/17/19 at 1:43 pm
Posted on 12/17/19 at 1:39 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
War doesn’t give one tiny frick about social experiments.
Posted on 12/17/19 at 1:45 pm to SadSouthernBuck
quote:
As a Marine veteran I say F*** THAT!
I'm with you on that!!! I was Station at PI for three years and the Training is not the same. I don't care what they want to tell the public! Also I went to Boot Camp in San Diego. I want to see a female hump Mount Mother F@#&% or B*@$# Ridge with a full ruck sack. These damn Liberals have destroyed everything else an now they want ruin my Corps.
Posted on 12/17/19 at 2:07 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
Until I see women starting at LB for NFL teams I cannot support gender integration into combat units.
Posted on 12/17/19 at 4:44 pm to Tiger1242
quote:
Don't the Israelis have some pretty bad arse female soldiers?
Firing a submachine gun at a 12 year old kid throwing a rock is not bad arse.
Posted on 12/17/19 at 5:18 pm to Jag_Warrior
I wish Pat Shroeder was still alive, so I could kick her in the count.
Posted on 12/17/19 at 5:20 pm to Tiger1242
quote:
Don't the Israelis have some pretty bad arse female soldiers?
No
They have an all women’s battalion that serves in a ceremonial role.
They do not use women in combat. Despite their acute manpower shortages.
If you’d like to know more, they go over it in the Marine Corps study. The study notes that we are the only country that seriously considers putting women into combat roles.
This post was edited on 12/17/19 at 9:19 pm
Posted on 12/17/19 at 5:23 pm to Jag_Warrior
quote:
Firing a submachine gun at a 12 year old kid throwing a rock is not bad arse.
You will get downvoted, but that’s accurate.
The IDF, working in the territories, they amount to unmotivated and badly trained prison guards. And they entertain themselves by taking potshots at the Palestinians.
Discipline is atrocious.
This post was edited on 12/17/19 at 9:20 pm
Posted on 12/17/19 at 5:30 pm to jeffsdad
quote:
Israel put their women on the front lines during the first phase of its existence. Having many of them raped to death changed their minds.
We should do the same, and then tell those that survive to go make us some sammiches.
Posted on 12/17/19 at 5:30 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
The solution is to have a women’s marine corps , kinda like the WNBA. We can all pretend it’s important and necessary.
Posted on 12/17/19 at 5:50 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
I agree women in the military is ridiculous, but be careful bringing up biological evolution. A lot of mouth breathers here don't understand it
Popular
Back to top



0









