Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us OT Engineers — Sodium Cooled Nuclear Reactors | O-T Lounge
Started By
Message
locked post

OT Engineers — Sodium Cooled Nuclear Reactors

Posted on 6/16/24 at 10:38 am
Posted by RanchoLaPuerto
Jena
Member since Aug 2023
2073 posts
Posted on 6/16/24 at 10:38 am
Bill Gates is on TV touting “third generation” nuclear reactors.

When asked about safety, he says these are safe because they are cooled by sodium instead of water.

Last I checked, sodium combusts when exposed to air and water. Water has never ever ignited.

Is this just a bunch of hooey? That doesn’t sound real safe.
This post was edited on 6/16/24 at 10:39 am
Posted by Turnblad85
Member since Sep 2022
4889 posts
Posted on 6/16/24 at 10:42 am to
You think he's trying to trick the nuclear design engineers into using something that will cause a disaster?
Posted by Tree_Fall
Member since Mar 2021
1144 posts
Posted on 6/16/24 at 10:44 am to
Real thing, well studied...LINK

Unsolved problem with reactors is safe disposal of spent fuel.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
17187 posts
Posted on 6/16/24 at 10:45 am to
He just wants some of those nuclear tax credits because he only wants all us poors to pay taxes.
Posted by Worldly Bum
Member since Jun 2024
223 posts
Posted on 6/16/24 at 10:46 am to
quote:

Unsolved problem with reactors is safe disposal of spent fuel.


Launch those frickers into the sun on Elon's Starship. The fact that we're not 100% nuclear at this point is a travesty.
Posted by RonLaFlamme
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2016
1858 posts
Posted on 6/16/24 at 10:49 am to
This might be the one thing he’s in favor of that could benefit humanity. Nuclear power generation is the densest form available to us and doesn’t burn those pesky greenhouse gases the environmentalists are so concerned about.
Posted by nugget
Abrego Garcia Fan
Member since Dec 2009
15692 posts
Posted on 6/16/24 at 10:49 am to
quote:

Launch those frickers into the sun on Elon's Starship. The fact that we're not 100% nuclear at this point is a travesty.


You want Nuclear units to handle the quick demand changes in the grid?
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
73571 posts
Posted on 6/16/24 at 10:50 am to
It's a good idea. But if a rocket explodes on take off. South Texas or Central Florida would be uninhabitable.
Posted by Worldly Bum
Member since Jun 2024
223 posts
Posted on 6/16/24 at 10:55 am to
quote:

You want Nuclear units to handle the quick demand changes in the grid?


I'm not sure what that means but there's plenty of nuclear power areas out there already. France is like 75% nuclear power. It's clean and the fuel last for a really long time. It's a no brainer.
Posted by Worldly Bum
Member since Jun 2024
223 posts
Posted on 6/16/24 at 10:56 am to
quote:

It's a good idea. But if a rocket explodes on take off. South Texas or Central Florida would be uninhabitable.


Launch from barges.
Posted by nugget
Abrego Garcia Fan
Member since Dec 2009
15692 posts
Posted on 6/16/24 at 11:00 am to
That’s unfortunately not how the grid works. The independent system operator dispatches operating units of many different types. You need big base loaded nuclear units to power large portions of the grid, but you also need gas turbines and engines to handle the minute by minute “swings” of power usage on the grid. Nukes can’t do that. The wider the range of options on the grid, the better.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
17187 posts
Posted on 6/16/24 at 11:00 am to
quote:

This might be the one thing he’s in favor of that could benefit humanity. Nuclear power generation is the densest form available to us and doesn’t burn those pesky greenhouse gases the environmentalists are so concerned about.

He should put his money where his mouth is. There’s no shortage of interest but a there is a shortage in capital to build them. He could fix that, but he prefers to play with other peoples money.
Posted by RanchoLaPuerto
Jena
Member since Aug 2023
2073 posts
Posted on 6/16/24 at 11:00 am to
quote:

A disadvantage of sodium is its chemical reactivity, which requires special precautions to prevent and suppress fires. If sodium comes into contact with water it reacts to produce sodium hydroxide and hydrogen, and the hydrogen burns in contact with air.


This is my concern.
Posted by RanchoLaPuerto
Jena
Member since Aug 2023
2073 posts
Posted on 6/16/24 at 11:02 am to
quote:

You think he's trying to trick the nuclear design engineers into using something that will cause a disaster?


Of course not.

But every system ever built eventually fails in some unpredicted way.

His take was that we don’t need to worry about meltdowns because he is using sodium instead of water.

I don’t see that as being safer.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
17187 posts
Posted on 6/16/24 at 11:03 am to
quote:

France is like 75% nuclear power

It’s not that high. I think 40-50% max. And that’s about all it ever should be. Nuclear is hyper centralization. That’s not a good thing in addition to what others noted about demand fluctuations.

ETA I should probably clarify, I think that percentage is generated not installed peak capacity.
This post was edited on 6/16/24 at 11:06 am
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
12714 posts
Posted on 6/16/24 at 11:03 am to
quote:

Launch those frickers into the sun on Elon's Starship.

It’s actually really hard to launch anything into the Sun from Earth. Would be easier to send them into deep space.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
113528 posts
Posted on 6/16/24 at 11:04 am to
quote:

I'm not sure what that means but there's plenty of nuclear power areas out there already. France is like 75% nuclear power. It's clean and the fuel last for a really long time. It's a no brainer.


Plus, there is enough space at these facilities to safely store spend rods (waste) for decades [hint: they're doing that right now].

They need to put $ into the small scale (city level) reactors.
Posted by mauser
Orange Beach
Member since Nov 2008
26309 posts
Posted on 6/16/24 at 11:07 am to
He should shut up and bring an expert with him to do the talking.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
17187 posts
Posted on 6/16/24 at 11:08 am to
quote:

They need to put $ into the small scale (city level) reactors.

Never going to happen unless we indemnify the developers and operators. No city in the US is going to allow it. They’ll bury them in litigation until the investors pull out. I’ve seen it happen several times already.
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
195407 posts
Posted on 6/16/24 at 11:09 am to
quote:

It's a good idea. But if a rocket explodes on take off. South Texas or Central Florida would be uninhabitable.
then build it in South LA.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram