- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So-called "moon landing"
Posted on 2/22/24 at 4:21 pm to saintsfan1977
Posted on 2/22/24 at 4:21 pm to saintsfan1977
quote:
Funny how none of the astronauts that we claim went to the moon were enthusiastic about it in interviews.
like that time Buzz knocked out a moon denier?
1
Posted on 2/22/24 at 4:21 pm to saintsfan1977
quote:
Well for the greatest feat of mankind, NASA (or someone) destroyed, erased, lost, and forgot about the technology surrounding the moon landing in the 60s and early 70s. All we have left is a few pictures and a couple of clips to take as gospel.
What technology?
Posted on 2/22/24 at 5:01 pm to saintsfan1977
quote:
Well for the greatest feat of mankind, NASA (or someone) destroyed, erased, lost, and forgot about the technology surrounding the moon landing in the 60s and early 70s.
y'all really need to learn how to read and comprehend.
the tech we used in the 60's is completely outdated now and would never get approval to be used today.
it was not an uncommon practice (especially in the 60s and 70s) across multiple industries to discard stuff that was no longer being used.
other than to be in a museum or something, there is no other reason to still have that 1960's tech. it would never be used today even if we had every detail laid out on a table in chronological order for someone to follow step by step.
Ford discarded the vast majority of the tech they used to develop and build the 1965 Mustang.
Do you belief that car never existed because Ford threw that useless shite away?
Ford seriously could not build a 1965 Mustang today if they wanted to without having to reverse engineer a good portion of it.
But just like the Saturn V, even if they did build it, it couldn't be sold (other than to be in a Garage or Museum) today.
we are currently in the process of developing and building current technology to use in today's world.
just like Ford is building current Mustangs.
Posted on 2/22/24 at 5:03 pm to momentoftruth87
quote:
momentoftruth87
Not surprised that our resident crayon eater is joining our 2 resident morons.
Posted on 2/22/24 at 5:10 pm to billjamin
quote:
like that time Buzz knocked out a moon denier?
Oh you mean the stalker? Buzz didn't punch him for denying he went to the moon, he punched him because the guy was stalking him.
Posted on 2/22/24 at 5:10 pm to Scuttle But
quote:
What technology?
The technology to put a man on the moon.
Posted on 2/22/24 at 5:13 pm to Nutriaitch
quote:
the tech we used in the 60's is completely outdated now and would never get approval to be used today.
it was not an uncommon practice (especially in the 60s and 70s) across multiple industries to discard stuff that was no longer being used.
other than to be in a museum or something, there is no other reason to still have that 1960's tech. it would never be used today even if we had every detail laid out on a table in chronological order for someone to follow step by step.
And yet a man hasn't been to the moon in over 50 years. We supposed to have a ship going today but man is deciding to sit this one out for the hundredth time in over 50 years. The moon! Psh!!!
This post was edited on 2/22/24 at 5:20 pm
Posted on 2/22/24 at 5:18 pm to saintsfan1977
It should be landing in about 10 minutes. The lander is supposed to shoot out a small camera onto the surface of the moon just before landing to video the landing for the first 3rd person POV pictures of a moon landing.
Posted on 2/22/24 at 5:19 pm to saintsfan1977
quote:
And yet a man hasn't been to the moon in over 50 years
because it's expensive and we'd rather spend that money elsewhere.
Posted on 2/22/24 at 5:24 pm to Scuttle But
quote:
The lander is supposed to shoot out a small camera onto the surface of the moon just before landing to video the landing for the first 3rd person POV pictures of a moon landing.
How fricking awesome is that? We get to see it land on the moon. AGAIN!!! Where is the astroNots?
Posted on 2/22/24 at 5:27 pm to saintsfan1977
It should be on the surface by now. No contact yet from the lander. They were expecting a couple minutes comm outage.
Posted on 2/22/24 at 5:30 pm to Scuttle But
Still no contact. Probably crashed.
Posted on 2/22/24 at 5:31 pm to saintsfan1977
quote:
AGAIN!!! Where is the astroNots?
why risk a human life when a robot can do all the work.
it's why we use drones in the military when we can.
Posted on 2/22/24 at 5:32 pm to Corinthians420
quote:
because it's expensive and we'd rather spend that money elsewhere.
BS. We spend millions of dollars on finding out how long it takes a mosquito to frick in Bangladesh or if a gay panda needs a shrink at a zoo in Singapore. If you believe the cost is the problem, you'll believe we put a man on the moon. I'm not surprised.
Posted on 2/22/24 at 5:33 pm to vistajay
Yeah no way the other governments are in on it 
Posted on 2/22/24 at 5:34 pm to Scuttle But
Somebody in chat just asked if they have AT&T?
Posted on 2/22/24 at 5:35 pm to saintsfan1977
quote:
you'll believe we put a man on the moon
So, it's your contention that we didn't put a man on the moon, is that correct? Did we at least put men in orbit around the moon? Or was that nonsense as well? What about putting men in orbit around the earth? The space station? Skylab? All that nonsense as well?
Posted on 2/22/24 at 5:36 pm to WestSideTiger
Says they're picking up a faint signal. But telemetry showed a slight unscheduled roll in the spacecraft just before touchdown.
Posted on 2/22/24 at 5:37 pm to Nutriaitch
quote:
why risk a human life when a robot can do all the work.
it's why we use drones in the military when we can.
Since when does the government value life? Quit being a moron.
No. We use drones in the military because it's faster than sending a guy with a grenade or a rocket. Nothing to do with saving lives. We would have an army of T2s and wouldn't need men volunteering.
I bet you're glued to the TV right now. You're seeing only what they want you to see.
Posted on 2/22/24 at 5:37 pm to Scuttle But
Comms established.
Page 27 of 49
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News