- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Solve for ?
Posted on 2/24/16 at 2:33 pm to VermilionTiger
Posted on 2/24/16 at 2:33 pm to VermilionTiger
Rex, Vermilion, and bourdini pass the test.
The rest of you are LOSERS.
The rest of you are LOSERS.
3
Posted on 2/24/16 at 2:34 pm to Rex
22
Posted on 2/24/16 at 2:34 pm to trident
i want to kick rex is the puppy nuts right now.
Posted on 2/24/16 at 2:34 pm to VermilionTiger
quote:
We have no given number for 3 candles
my 6yo daughter would disagree
Posted on 2/24/16 at 2:35 pm to CAD703X
Stupid math
Posted on 2/24/16 at 2:35 pm to Rex
quote:
The rest of you are LOSERS.
Posted on 2/24/16 at 2:35 pm to trident
The retarded thing about this is that the number of steeples or candles is completely irrelevant to the fricking math problem. There is no prior certainty that 1 steeple = 1 number or 1 candle = 1 number.
The answer is 22 based on castle, sheep and candle. Stop posting these retarded Facebook posts. Americans, as a whole, can perform basic math functions. If you have to start throwing in hidden shite, you should use your wasted time, learn a new skill and be a productive part of society.
The answer is 22 based on castle, sheep and candle. Stop posting these retarded Facebook posts. Americans, as a whole, can perform basic math functions. If you have to start throwing in hidden shite, you should use your wasted time, learn a new skill and be a productive part of society.
This post was edited on 2/24/16 at 2:36 pm
Posted on 2/24/16 at 2:35 pm to Rex
quote:
It's not solvable
quote:frick you.
That's the correct answer.
Posted on 2/24/16 at 2:36 pm to 1MileTiger
Posted on 2/24/16 at 2:36 pm to Rex
16
Posted on 2/24/16 at 2:36 pm to CAD703X
quote:
my 6yo daughter would disagree
I mean, sure. But if a sheep is = 15, 4 candles = 4, just because we have 3 candles doesn't mean it = 3.
Posted on 2/24/16 at 2:37 pm to Rex
quote:I was coming here to say this, but I don't want to agree with you, so my answer is 20
I say it's not solvable. There's no legitimate reason to assume the symbol values you did to arrive at 20.
Posted on 2/24/16 at 2:37 pm to Rex
If you look at it as a sheep is 15, a candle is 1, and a steeple is 1, it becomes solvable. And the answer is 20. If you take the entire image of 4 candles as an X value instead of each individual candle as an X value, it is unsolvable. It's a petty gotcha attempt.
Posted on 2/24/16 at 2:38 pm to 1MileTiger
quote:
The retarded thing about this is that the number of steeples or candles is complete irrelevant to the fricking math problem.
Wow.
So they use symbols to represent numbers, but when they slightly change the symbol it is suppose mean the same thing?
You, sir, do not understand basic algebra.
This post was edited on 2/24/16 at 2:39 pm
Posted on 2/24/16 at 2:38 pm to GinHater
A sheep is one animal. Therefore it will always be 15. You can derive that a candle and a steeple are their own values, and them clustered together are simply the value in a parenthesis (15)+(1+1+1)+(1+1)
Posted on 2/24/16 at 2:38 pm to Rex
21
ETA: Didn't count the steeples. 20
ETA: Didn't count the steeples. 20
This post was edited on 2/24/16 at 2:41 pm
Posted on 2/24/16 at 2:39 pm to Rex
quote:
That's the correct answer. You and I are a cut above the crowd, it seems.
In theory, because the candles on the 3nd row has four candles & is worth 4 then the 3 candles in row 4 would be worth 3 so assuming there is an answer then 21 would be the logical answer.
Posted on 2/24/16 at 2:39 pm to GinHater
quote:
If you take the entire image of 4 candles as an X value instead of each individual candle as an X value, it is unsolvable.
without instructions that one candle is made of lead and the others are made of wax and already established that 4 candles = 4, why wouldn't 3/4 (take away one candle) be 3?
oh and frick you rex
Posted on 2/24/16 at 2:39 pm to OneMoreTime
Facebook riddles be like...
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News