- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tangipahoa Parish rape victim ordered to pay her abuser child support
Posted on 6/14/22 at 8:47 am to Olderthandirt
Posted on 6/14/22 at 8:47 am to Olderthandirt
quote:
Barnes may be a bad guy and guilty. Like I said, I do not know him. But that does not make the other party an angel.
He is a good dude. You can't get around the statutory thing. It appears she was under age and he is the dad. But the accusation that he straight up raped the mom? I just can't believe that. There is something more here I would bet and the sealed records are probably in place to protect the child that happens a lot. Something just doesn't make sense about any of this.
This post was edited on 6/14/22 at 8:48 am
0
Posted on 6/14/22 at 8:51 am to burgeman
quote:
I don't think the Pub existed in 2005? Was Ledbetters still around?
Pub didn't open until about 2006 / 2007. Story says it happened in Hammond and I would guess that it was Extra Innings. That place was a haven for the under age.
This post was edited on 6/14/22 at 9:03 am
Posted on 6/14/22 at 8:55 am to Ponchy Tiger
quote:
Extra Innings. That place was a haven for the under age.
Probably why that "good guy" was there.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 9:02 am to NatalbanyTigerFan
quote:
Probably why that "good guy" was there.
I am just speculating when someone asked if it could have been the pub. It may not have been there. It doesn't really matter.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 9:27 am to NatalbanyTigerFan
....I guess it really shouldnt shock me that a site where a bunch of 35-70 year old men are simultaneously melting cause a poster didnt include sexual pics of a recently turned 18 year old girl, also happen to have a high level of underage rape apologism.
This post was edited on 6/14/22 at 9:28 am
Posted on 6/14/22 at 9:38 am to Olderthandirt
It’s good to see a few level headed critical thinkers showed up in the last couple of pages after the first few pages were filled with overemotional women.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 9:51 am to Bronc
quote:
....I guess it really shouldnt shock me that a site where a bunch of 35-70 year old men are simultaneously melting cause a poster didnt include sexual pics of a recently turned 18 year old girl, also happen to have a high level of underage rape apologism.
Quit projecting your own melting on others. It’s unbecoming.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 9:54 am to The Boat
quote:
It’s good to see a few level headed critical thinkers showed up in the last couple of pages after the first few pages were filled with overemotional women.
He committed a felony for which mistaken age is NOT a defense and carries up to 10 years with mandatory sexual registry. No, he didn't chain her in a closet and rape her for years but this "good dude" committed a heinous crime.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 9:54 am to keakar
quote:What a joke. You obviously know nothing about the legal system if you believe this bullshite.
you damn well know a judge never does this without rock solid grounds to do it and an absolute certainty about the situation
Posted on 6/14/22 at 10:03 am to TigerintheNO
quote:
statue of limitations
Posted on 6/14/22 at 10:03 am to Obtuse1
Statutory rape and dirty local politics. All that's missing is some devil worship for the Ponchatoula Trifecta. I grew up in Ponchatoula and none of this surprises me in the least. Tangipahoa parish should go ahead and lower their age of consent to 12 to unclog the courts.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 10:17 am to Tangineck
quote:
devil worship
Posted on 6/14/22 at 10:23 am to Obtuse1
quote:
committed a heinous crime.
I've done my best to not comment on this thread, but this is fricking absurd. Some 16 year old slut went to a bar and did the exact kind of stuff she wanted to and suffered the consequences of those choices.
Don't sit here and lie to me that you ID ever y girl you've slept with. 16 and 18 year olds look identical most of the time, so spare me with the "he obviously should have none" nonsense.
This guy may be a complete piece of shite, but banging some 16 year old that lied about her age isn't the evidence you think it is.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 10:26 am to LNCHBOX
Well I mean if you want to get into the morality of it that’s one thing, but the law is (arguably unfairly) clear that there’s no ignorance of age excuse for statutory rape. IIRC even being shown a fake ID has been held irrelevant and not a defense.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 10:26 am to Olderthandirt
quote:
Barnes may be a bad guy and guilty. Like I said, I do not know him. But that does not make the other party an angel.
Like I said earlier, there has to be more to the story.
But it’s still incredible that a judge would first give this guy partial custody and then years later give him full custody when he raped the mother. That’s crazy.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 10:28 am to Havoc
quote:
Well I mean if you want to get into the morality of it that’s one thing, but the law is (arguably unfairly) clear that there’s no ignorance of age excuse for statutory rape. IIRC even being shown a fake ID has been held irrelevant and not a defense.
I'm not saying it isn't technically against the law. I'm saying that we don't know this guy is "heinous" based on some slut doing slut things.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 10:28 am to LNCHBOX
Lunchbox is here. Now it’s a thread 
Lunchbox coming in HOT and owning fools post 1.
Lunchbox coming in HOT and owning fools post 1.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 10:33 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
I'm not saying it isn't technically against the law. I'm saying that we don't know this guy is "heinous" based on some slut doing slut things.
Well, I’m sure there are a number of possible factors that if present would make it seem much less so. Meeting a girl in a bar IMO is a pretty reasonable basis to believe she’s at least 17-18, if not older, although again not a legal defense. Maybe she was with older friends as well.
Posted on 6/14/22 at 10:33 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
I've done my best to not comment on this thread, but this is fricking absurd. Some 16 year old slut went to a bar and did the exact kind of stuff she wanted to and suffered the consequences of those choices.
Don't sit here and lie to me that you ID ever y girl you've slept with. 16 and 18 year olds look identical most of the time, so spare me with the "he obviously should have none" nonsense.
This guy may be a complete piece of shite, but banging some 16 year old that lied about her age isn't the evidence you think it is.
Here's another thought, if you are 30+ at bars trying to pick up drunk girls that look between 16-18, and you aren't sure, but "trust" she ain't lying cause you want your dick sucked by that drunk chick, you're a predator POS and in a more just world they'd lock your arse up
Posted on 6/14/22 at 10:34 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Some 16 year old slut went to a bar and did the exact kind of stuff she wanted to and suffered the consequences of those choices.
She made a bad decision which very well could have been due to peer pressure.
quote:
Don't sit here and lie to me that you ID ever y girl you've slept with, so spare me with the "he obviously should have none" nonsense.
No, but the Bar should have. And if she was inside the bar and drinking, they should be held with some kind of liability.
And to stress this:
quote:
16 and 18 year olds look identical most of the time
He is fricking 30 years old. Maybe you should be aiming a little higher than an 18 year old that looks like she might be 16. Despite what is popular on a message board like TD, most 30 year olds don't tend to try to get with seniors in high school or incoming freshman in college.
And regardless of everything else you said:
quote:
This guy may be a complete piece of shite, but banging some 16 year old that lied about her age isn't the evidence you think it is.
Louisiana law states not knowing her age isn't an excuse. So no matter your opinion or my opinion on the matter, the law says it's Rape. He got proof of being the father and age of child and mother proves the age of the occurrence.
She very much made bad decisions, and may have only filed a police report due to revenge for getting custody. She may be white trash. Regardless, he did commit a crime.
Page 7 of 42
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News