- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: US Military Vs Civilians
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:34 am to alphaandomega
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:34 am to alphaandomega
quote:
They would know what had be be done to knock out bridges, water plants, refineries, electrical grid, etc.
This only hurts civilians, not the military
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:36 am to Thib-a-doe Tiger
Considering almost every Veteran would side with the Military, then the Military wins in a walk.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:37 am to alphaandomega
quote:
Do you believe that the military would just wipe away other Americans?
It’s a hypothetical question, of course they wouldn’t. That’s kinda the fun of the thread
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:37 am to alphaandomega
quote:
but in the long run there are too many armed civilians.
That adds up to dry shite if you cant feed, refuel and resupply. Its a sustainment and logistical nightmare, there would be zero infrastructure to support that many people and those different calibers.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:40 am to Lakeboy7
quote:i bet a small percentace actually have true combat time. A good bit have been deployed but true combat time..... i bet not too many
How much actual combat time do you have? because many many in that 2 mil have plenty.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:40 am to Thib-a-doe Tiger
The will of the people wins
Unless the military plans on simply carpet nuking the land, the will of the people will win.
Unless the military plans on simply carpet nuking the land, the will of the people will win.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:41 am to Thib-a-doe Tiger
Military has a hard time with insurgents. It is a tough call, but I think most people in the US are dumb enough to try and fight a tank head on
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:42 am to Steauxn
quote:
brrrrrttttttt
I watched a solid 3 hours of warthog videos on YouTube a few nights ago
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:42 am to Sasquatch Smash
quote:and the military is made up of a bunch of kids who's friends, family, brothers, mothers are in that civilian population. It wont take too long for these guys to turn on who ever is giving them the orders to kill their families.
Military has artillery, bombs, air support, and other explosive ordnance that would decimate the civilian population.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:43 am to Thib-a-doe Tiger
Who could believe a well armed group of civilians could defeat the US Military? Turns out quite a few in Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan believe it.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:45 am to carhartt
quote:
Considering almost every Veteran would side with the Military, then the Military wins in a walk.
They didn't take an oath to protect the military, they took an oath to protect against enemies foreign and domestic. They also swore to abide by the orders of the president, but in the hypothetical scenario, the president would be a domestic threat
This post was edited on 10/4/17 at 10:46 am
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:45 am to carhartt
quote:
Considering almost every Veteran would side with the Military, then the Military wins in a walk.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:46 am to LSUTigersVCURams
You understand why those are different than a countries military completely turning against its own civilians right?
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:47 am to CarRamrod
military is having a hard time in the middle east
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:47 am to LSUTigersVCURams
quote:
Who could believe a well armed group of civilians could defeat the US Military? Turns out quite a few in Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan believe it.
Ive changed my views on this in the past few days. I think the US defeats its citizens, but that it would not be as easy as some think
This post was edited on 10/4/17 at 10:48 am
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:49 am to 50_Tiger
quote:
You seriously think the ROE will be the same here?
Depends. Are they trying to make citizens bend to their will, or are they trying to exterminate them
This post was edited on 10/4/17 at 10:50 am
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:53 am to Thib-a-doe Tiger
quote:
Depends. Are they trying to make citizens bend to their will, or are they trying to exterminate them
I took this scenario as a no holds barred, no prisoners scenario.
OP probably needs to be more specific on the ROE because that does change things.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:53 am to Thib-a-doe Tiger
quote:
US Military Vs Civilians
This one is easy. The people win, because the military will not kill their own families and people. The military will then turn on the government. Just look at the French revolution.
Posted on 10/4/17 at 10:59 am to dfintlyHmmrd
quote:
Exactly, the idea that a bunch of inbred country bumpkins could stop trained professional and very well equipped soldiers because they hunt and shoot all the time is a fricking pipe dream
Tell that to the Taliban.
Popular
Back to top



0






