- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Woman in Minnesota tried ramming ICE Officer gets unalived. NSFW
Posted on 1/15/26 at 11:30 am to kywildcatfanone
Posted on 1/15/26 at 11:30 am to kywildcatfanone
quote:
Sounds like they might be charging the lady who encouraged her to hit the cop. Been waiting for that.
Where's her cell phone video ? The one with her screaming GO GO GO .
you can bet if it wasn't incrimination CNN and MSNBC would be playing it on loop.
0
Posted on 1/15/26 at 12:05 pm to HogBalls
Dem running for congress tries to inflame situation and gain leftist votes, but he didn’t pay for private registration of the website…
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 1/15/26 at 12:08 pm to dallastigers
unfortunately you just gave mmmmmbeer a great idea.
This post was edited on 1/15/26 at 12:10 pm
Posted on 1/15/26 at 9:35 pm to Klark Kent
Minnesota state rep live tweeting locations of federal officers.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. This post was edited on 1/15/26 at 9:37 pm
Posted on 1/15/26 at 9:42 pm to dallastigers
Is that truly a crime? I don’t believe so.
Posted on 1/15/26 at 10:11 pm to cubsfan5150
quote:
Is that truly a crime? I don’t believe so.
I am sure he will say he wasn’t up to anything and likely hard to prove anything by individual tweets alone without tying him to pushing the mob to commit illegal actions towards ICE, but this is obviously part of the overall obstruction, interference, targeted harassment, doxxing, and intimidation of ICE officers by helping to direct leftists to locations and also aiding & abetting illegals to know where ICE officers are. It also helps those who are willing to mob attack officers or ransack their vehicles, steal a FBI rifle (gang member was recently arrested by ATF for taking rifle), remove official documents and a badge to a federal office along with other stuff in the vehicles like was done last night.
My biggest deal is he is just one more state or local official or representative that is openly pushing and aiding the obstruction of the enforcement of our immigration law and the targeted harassment of ICE officers enforcing our immigration laws. When shite happens they will jump to blaming ICE and Trump and calling for them to de-escalate (i.e. stop enforcing immigration laws on our future voters) when it is them pushing the buttons, pushing rhetoric, and directing the mob to locations which is all actually helping to escalate the problems going on.
This post was edited on 1/16/26 at 11:42 am
Posted on 1/15/26 at 10:27 pm to dallastigers
I’m not saying it’s right, just not sure it’s a crime, ala flashing your fellow drivers when there’s a cop on the side running radar.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 12:17 am to cubsfan5150
of course you don’t, it’s one of your own doing the doxx’ing.
This post was edited on 1/16/26 at 12:19 am
Posted on 1/16/26 at 5:05 am to cubsfan5150
Hes supposed to be an American, but as a democrat, he hated America and wants to bring harm to its citizens.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 6:40 am to cubsfan5150
quote:
Is that truly a crime? I don’t believe so.
I’m pretty sure that publicly reporting the locations of ICE is not a crime, and it’s probably protected by the First Amendment.
I am NOT saying it’s good or advisable.
It is probably also very easy to go from there to interference, which may be criminal.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 7:48 am to Klark Kent
quote:
of course you don’t, it’s one of your own doing the doxx’ing.
It must be a sad life seeing everything through the lens of left and right.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 7:50 am to RanchoLaPuerto
quote:
I’m pretty sure that publicly reporting the locations of ICE is not a crime, and it’s probably protected by the First Amendment. I am NOT saying it’s good or advisable. It is probably also very easy to go from there to interference, which may be criminal.
You and I are on the same page.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 8:19 am to cubsfan5150
Oh, I guess you’ll have to forgive me, but it’s very clearly the Left that’s doxxing, disrupting, threatening, and assaulting federal law enforcement officers. And I’m very clearly on the opposite side of that.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 8:31 am to Klark Kent
quote:
Oh, I guess you’ll have to forgive me, but it’s very clearly the Left that’s doxxing, disrupting, threatening, and assaulting federal law enforcement officers. And I’m very clearly on the opposite side of that.
Cool story... now explain to me how this is a certain crime
quote:, which is were our conversation began.
Minnesota state rep live tweeting locations of federal officers.
I'm sure there's some way that it could be twisted into some low level crime, but we all know, it's not really. Doesn't make it right though.
Go enjoy your rage though.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 9:12 am to Klark Kent
quote:
And I’m very clearly on the opposite side of that.
Sure. At most levels, though, that is not criminal. It’s actually probably protected speech.
Doxxing is a whole new field, and it’s amorphous.
I don’t think it is wrongful to identify an ICE officer by name. It is absolutely wrongful to combine that with any suggestion that someone harm or harass the officer. It is a question of degree.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 9:49 am to cubsfan5150
You’re responding to someone who said
By stating this:
Do you seriously need someone to explain to you how threatening and assaulting law enforcement is a crime? If disrupting means interfering with, that can also be a crime.
quote:[
but it’s very clearly the Left that’s doxxing, disrupting, threatening, and assaulting federal law enforcement officers.
By stating this:
quote:
Cool story... now explain to me how this is a certain crime
Do you seriously need someone to explain to you how threatening and assaulting law enforcement is a crime? If disrupting means interfering with, that can also be a crime.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 9:53 am to Willie Stroker
quote:
You’re responding to someone who said
Read further back
quote:
Do you seriously need someone to explain to you how threatening and assaulting law enforcement is a crime? If disrupting means interfering with, that can also be a crime.
Nobody said it isn't
This likely isn't though
quote:
live tweeting locations of federal officers
This post was edited on 1/16/26 at 9:54 am
Posted on 1/16/26 at 11:41 am to RanchoLaPuerto
quote:
Posted by cubsfan5150
quote:
I'm sure there's some way that it could be twisted into some low level crime, but we all know, it's not really. Doesn't make it right though.
quote:
Sure. At most levels, though, that is not criminal. It’s actually probably protected speech. Doxxing is a whole new field, and it’s amorphous. I don’t think it is wrongful to identify an ICE officer by name. It is absolutely wrongful to combine that with any suggestion that someone harm or harass the officer. It is a question of degree.
Let’s get one thing straight: I never said or implied this should be a crime. That’s not what I am arguing.
What I am going to call out is that a Democratic politician very openly stoked the fire and encouraged Leftist behavior that results in doxxing, disruption, harassment, and even assault against federal law enforcement agents.
You can sugar coat it as “protected speech” or “amorphous doxxing,” but that’s just dishonest framing. You know that.
Downplaying or minimizing what he said, especially in the context of real violence erupting on the streets because of clashes between protesters and agents after the Minneapolis ICE incidents: is either dishonest or intentional obfuscation.
There’s a clear line here, and pretending it’s all semantics doesn’t magically erase the consequences. You know that.
This post was edited on 1/16/26 at 11:56 am
Posted on 1/16/26 at 12:43 pm to RanchoLaPuerto
Saying where People are working isn't Doxing. Now of they named each officer. That would be doxing. Doxing usually involes publishing addresses or phone numbers.
This post was edited on 1/16/26 at 12:44 pm
Posted on 1/16/26 at 12:49 pm to cubsfan5150
quote:
I’m not saying it’s right, just not sure it’s a crime, ala flashing your fellow drivers when there’s a cop on the side running radar.
It’s a little different as it’s not just about warning illegals where ICE is but also informing the obstructionist and at times violent mob where to go to illegally act against ICE. Also, the warning of criminal illegals of an operation in progress to detain them is likely a worse offense than warning oncoming cars who might not even be speeding in the first place.
I haven’t read all the copies of his tweets or looked any further at him to know if he has made it clear why he is live tweeting their locations and/or if he has called on the protesters to go beyond legal protest into obstructing, threatening, and so on using his info. If he is smart he would make it like he was just posting the info to keep citizens in areas to stay out of harms way or for people to avoid areas due to possible traffic annd safety issues.
Someone pointing out cops with radars in order for possible speeders to avoid getting a ticket which just happens to be used by a group to go target, harass, intimidate, and obstruct those cops from doing their jobs is very different than someone pointing out the cops to knowingly help or direct that group to target those same cops to harass, intimidate, obstruct, or do worse to them.
I believe the guy is doing the later (but towards ICE obviously) but acknowledge that without more evidence than I have seen the former is the only way our legal system can currently view the tweets.
Below is one of the federal laws I have seen one or two people bring up when talking about the left’s illegal actions towards ICE during “protests” and even outside of them. Thru other laws it includes the family of the officers if they are attacked, threatened, intimidated, and so on due to the officer’s performance of official duties or on account of performing those duties.
quote:
18 U.S. Code § 111 - Assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers or employees
(a) In General.—Whoever—
(1) forcibly assaults, resists, opposes, impedes, intimidates, or interferes with any person designated in section 1114 of this title while engaged in or on account of the performance of official duties; or
(2) forcibly assaults or intimidates any person who formerly served as a person designated in section 1114 on account of the performance of official duties during such person’s term of service,
shall, where the acts in violation of this section constitute only simple assault, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both, and where such acts involve physical contact with the victim of that assault or the intent to commit another felony, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.
(b) Enhanced Penalty.—
Whoever, in the commission of any acts described in subsection (a), uses a deadly or dangerous weapon (including a weapon intended to cause death or danger but that fails to do so by reason of a defective component) or inflicts bodily injury, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
(c) Extraterritorial Jurisdiction.—
There is extraterritorial jurisdiction over the conduct prohibited by this section.
This post was edited on 1/16/26 at 1:30 pm
Page 77 of 78
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News