Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us WTF happened to JonBenet? | Page 20 | O-T Lounge
Started By
Message

re: WTF happened to JonBenet?

Posted on 9/19/16 at 10:10 pm to
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
142673 posts
Posted on 9/19/16 at 10:10 pm to
You think trace evidence from the guy who packaged the underwear was still on the underwear but no other family members DNA would not be present on Jonbenét?
Posted by HaveMercy
Member since Dec 2014
3000 posts
Posted on 9/19/16 at 10:10 pm to
Ah, ok - I only saw 2 so it must have been the last two. Didn't realize it was three parts.

I hope somebody does an OJ like mini-series on the Jon Benet case - done correctly, would be riveting.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
62554 posts
Posted on 9/19/16 at 10:10 pm to
quote:

There's not one shred of doubt that the boy did this and the parents covered it up. Ramsey probably donated large sums to the DA and that was that.
That was certainly the agenda of the CBS special that just aired.
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
33818 posts
Posted on 9/19/16 at 10:14 pm to
quote:

What would legally happen to the 9 year old?

Removal from home. Health facility for a lengthy amount of time

Parents are also subject to arrest if they are found to have not taken adequate precautions, since he had already clubbed her in the face
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
33818 posts
Posted on 9/19/16 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

You think trace evidence from the guy who packaged the underwear was still on the underwear but no other family members DNA would not be present on Jonbenét?

We know John carried her, so his DNA would have been all over her. I just think they discarded the parents DNA when they used the stranger DNA to exonerate the family
Posted by kwalt1989
Life is great in the 318
Member since Oct 2014
789 posts
Posted on 9/19/16 at 10:18 pm to
quote:

Parents are also subject to arrest if they are found to have not taken adequate precautions, since he had already clubbed her in the face


Parents would be under arrest for way longer if they covered up a possible homicide.
Posted by efrad
Member since Nov 2007
18703 posts
Posted on 9/19/16 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

Parents would be under arrest for way longer if they covered up a possible homicide.



Unless the cover up worked
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
33818 posts
Posted on 9/19/16 at 10:24 pm to
quote:

Parents would be under arrest for way longer if they covered up a possible homicide.

Do you take your chances that even if discovered, both of you are sent away, leaving Burke alone; or rat out Burke and all 3 of you end up in trouble because the judge doesn't pity one parent, because there is no need to raise Burke?

Their whole goal was to muddy the waters. it worked
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
142673 posts
Posted on 9/19/16 at 10:25 pm to
The golf club thing doesn't prove anything other than she got hit with a golf club.

A few years ago my friend received a new sand wedge as a Christmas gift. His kid got a new kitten. Later that day, he took a few very soft swings in the house. Kitten ran right into the path of the club. RIP kitten.

Things like that happen. It doesn't prove he murdered anyone.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 9/19/16 at 10:25 pm to
quote:

That was certainly the agenda of the CBS special that just aired.


I realize that. And I think they were dead on despite the agenda.
Posted by LSUtoOmaha
Nashville
Member since Apr 2004
26727 posts
Posted on 9/19/16 at 10:26 pm to
Me too. I think the mom did it still.
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
142673 posts
Posted on 9/19/16 at 10:27 pm to
quote:

We know John carried her, so his DNA would have been all over her. I


Yet, none of his DNA was found on her.
Posted by kwalt1989
Life is great in the 318
Member since Oct 2014
789 posts
Posted on 9/19/16 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

Unless the cover up worked


I'm sure rational thinking gets thrown to the wayside in situations like this. I just have a hard time believing John, an intelligent, multi-millionaire businessman would throw everything away and possibly go to prison to cover up an accidental death. The letter and other key things point to a cover up, but my own conscience wouldn't let me cover that up like that.
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 9/19/16 at 10:36 pm to
quote:

possibly go to prison to cover up an accidental death.
His thinking is that my son has just killed my daughter. They're going to take him away. I can't lose both of my children tonight.
Posted by lsuman25
Erwinville
Member since Aug 2013
43268 posts
Posted on 9/19/16 at 10:37 pm to
Whether it was a coverup by the family or an outside job the sad reality is a young girl was killed with the rest of her life and the case will most likely never be solved.
Posted by efrad
Member since Nov 2007
18703 posts
Posted on 9/19/16 at 10:38 pm to
quote:

I'm sure rational thinking gets thrown to the wayside in situations like this. I just have a hard time believing John, an intelligent, multi-millionaire businessman would throw everything away and possibly go to prison to cover up an accidental death. The letter and other key things point to a cover up, but my own conscience wouldn't let me cover that up like that.



I wouldn't do it either. At least I say that while I'm calm and not in that situation. Dealing with a hysterical wife and pumping full of adrenaline with my daughter dead, I might make that decision.

I mean, people do all kinds of crazy stupid unbelievable stuff, it wouldn't surprise me that someone would do this.
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27937 posts
Posted on 9/19/16 at 10:38 pm to
quote:

You think trace evidence from the guy who packaged the underwear was still on the underwear but no other family members DNA would not be present on Jonbenét?
The parents DNA was on JonBenet's clothes.

If I remember correctly, they found 6 separate DNA profiles.

But the only one that matched an adult male besides John Ramsey was this Hispanic male's DNA they found. Because that Hispanic male was the only adult male other than John's DNA that they found, the DA assumed that this person must have been the murderer.

They didn't really tell all of that in any of these documentaries.
This post was edited on 9/19/16 at 10:42 pm
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
142673 posts
Posted on 9/19/16 at 10:42 pm to
So DNA from 4 family members were found and 2 unknown subjects?
Posted by semotruman
Member since Nov 2011
23188 posts
Posted on 9/19/16 at 10:49 pm to
quote:

Just for discussion purposes, say a 9 year child killed a younger sibling in a childhood argument gone wrong. What would legally happen to the 9 year old?

In Colorado, they can't prosecute anyone under the age of 10. He would likely have been put into a facility for psych treatment for a while, depending on whether it was truly an accident or intentional.
Posted by beauchristopher
Member since Jan 2008
73183 posts
Posted on 9/19/16 at 10:54 pm to
quote:

ou think trace evidence from the guy who packaged the underwear was still on the underwear but no other family members DNA would not be present on Jonbenét?


Were they brand new then?

Why wouldn't the family members dna be on it? Do they no handle her underwear at all??
Jump to page
Page First 18 19 20 21 22 ... 35
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 20 of 35Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram