- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fishing/boating on someone else’s property to remain illegal
Posted on 5/1/19 at 2:50 pm to Mr Wonderful
Posted on 5/1/19 at 2:50 pm to Mr Wonderful
Y’all can come fish my canal anytime ya want.
0
Posted on 5/1/19 at 3:26 pm to AlxTgr
every argument you've attempted to make is so outlandish you have shown me that you really cannot be taken seriously. Every one.
Posted on 5/1/19 at 3:35 pm to AlxTgr
Does a landowner that places a gate on a man made canal that connects to a public waterway have to make a reasonable effort to remove all of the wildlife from the canal?
Posted on 5/1/19 at 3:38 pm to Bedhog
quote:This is utter bullshite. All I do in these threads is point out the illogical arguments of the trespassers and point out the correct status of the law. What arguments are you talking about? You realize I know this topic very well, right?
very argument you've attempted to make is so outlandish you have shown me that you really cannot be taken seriously. Every one.
Posted on 5/1/19 at 3:38 pm to lotik
quote:Of course not.
Does a landowner that places a gate on a man made canal that connects to a public waterway have to make a reasonable effort to remove all of the wildlife from the canal?
Posted on 5/1/19 at 3:48 pm to AlxTgr
What are landowners trying to prevent by gating navigable waterways? Access to the water, access to the land below the water, or access to the wildlife in the water?
Posted on 5/1/19 at 3:49 pm to Bedhog
We aren't just talking canals, a lot of the open water is supposedly privately owned.
Posted on 5/1/19 at 3:51 pm to AlxTgr
"what if an airboat could travel over grass"
You attempted to use this as an argument for boats to be in navigable waterways.
It's absurd man.
You attempted to use this as an argument for boats to be in navigable waterways.
It's absurd man.
Posted on 5/1/19 at 3:52 pm to lotik
quote:The use of navigable in your question is curious. What made you use it?
What are landowners trying to prevent by gating navigable waterways?
I don't own any such water way, so it's somewhat difficult to speak for each one of these people. My guess is, since these people own the land on either side of the canal, as well as the bottom of the canal, they are trying to prevent entry onto their property.
Posted on 5/1/19 at 3:58 pm to AlxTgr
I would compare them to roads.
Posted on 5/1/19 at 4:00 pm to lotik
quote:
What are landowners trying to prevent by gating navigable waterways?
I have no dog in the fight but that’s my question as well.
Also, could you possibly “gate out” a neighbor further back on the water and leave them with no access in or out?
Posted on 5/1/19 at 4:02 pm to Hog Zealot
I would assume, but that has gotten me in trouble before, that the landowner would have own all of the land, or have agreement from the other landowners.
Posted on 5/1/19 at 4:14 pm to lotik
They get jealous when people go catch a bunch of fish.
Posted on 5/1/19 at 4:16 pm to lotik
quote:That's better than most arguments here. The State/Parish/City owns he land under the roads.
I would compare them to roads.
Posted on 5/1/19 at 4:21 pm to lotik
quote:
I would compare them to roads
there are gated roads that lead to private property also
just like a gated canal that leads to private marsh
This post was edited on 5/1/19 at 4:26 pm
Posted on 5/1/19 at 4:39 pm to lotik
quote:or driveways
would compare them to roads.
Posted on 5/1/19 at 4:41 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
The State/Parish/City owns he land under the roads.
I have a gravel road on my property that I maintain without State/parish/city funds. It’s a private road. That same argument could be used for these canals. If the owners maintain it with their own funds then it’s theirs to do with as they please.
If someone’s only way of access to their property is through yours I believe you are required to grant them a right-of-way. That same argument would also apply to canals, possibly.
Posted on 5/1/19 at 4:43 pm to Ron Cheramie
But who owns the water? If the landowner owns access to the water that is connected to a public waterway, do they also own the sky above their property? How high? Can they prohibit someone from flying over their property?
This all assumes no one is exiting their vessel or docking it.
This all assumes no one is exiting their vessel or docking it.
Posted on 5/1/19 at 4:58 pm to lotik
quote:
How high?
500 foot starts public airspace
quote:the nets work for ducks
an they prohibit someone from flying over their property?
quote:the land owner
But who owns the water?
The water would not be there without the effort and expense of the landowner.
Posted on 5/1/19 at 5:32 pm to tigerfoot
Can you kindly point me to the law that states you own 500 ft about your property?
Since the landowner owns the water, can they opt out of having their water levels regulated by the fed?
Since the landowner owns the water, can they opt out of having their water levels regulated by the fed?
Page 3 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News