- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/6/25 at 10:55 am to 4cubbies
quote:
My husband and I are lucky that we have jobs that are flexible. I can step out for hours to attend conferences, school performances, etc or bring my kids to work with me a lot of the time if I need to. My husband can work from home or have the kids tag along with him on the road if he needs to.
I don't care about impressing people on the poli board with the number of hours I work or anything else.
Don't worry. No one here is impressed by you or your husband. No danger of that.
Posted on 8/6/25 at 10:56 am to Jrv2damac
quote:
Nobody cares, you stupid bitch.
Posted on 8/7/25 at 10:14 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
The election results are harder to find, but it's super easy to find as many sources as you want for anti-suffragist women's groups from back then.
I'm sure there were dissenters. There were dissenters to the American Revolution, too. Most colonists did not support independence from Britain. Does that invalidate the American Revolution?
Posted on 8/7/25 at 10:26 am to GatorOnAnIsland
Intelligent? Maybe? Lazy? Absolutely!!
Posted on 8/7/25 at 11:40 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
I'm sure there were dissenters. There were dissenters to the American Revolution, too. Most colonists did not support independence from Britain. Does that invalidate the American Revolution?
No one said it invalidated anything. The fact that it has done an excellent job destroying the nuclear family, being responsible for the death of more human beings than Joseph Stalin, and generally making both men and women more miserable is what invalidates it.
But seriously...do you approach ANYTHING in good faith? Do you ALWAYS mischaracterize the opposing argument?
I can honestly say that if I have ever seen you make it through a thread without doing so, I can't remember it.
This question came up in the context of you claiming that there is no evidence to support the claim that women were not primarily responsible for feminism. No one said anything about it being invalidated because of that claim.
Posted on 8/8/25 at 6:50 am to GatorOnAnIsland
So she lost her gubment job. Now try and find a real one with your resume and work ethic.
Posted on 8/8/25 at 8:27 am to GatorOnAnIsland
She is mentally ill. Unfortunately for her most of the people that are trained to help her through counciling have the same mental illness.
Posted on 8/8/25 at 8:35 am to prplngldtigr
quote:
They work twice as hard to get half as far
Productivity is a function of ability and effort.
Let's use a person with an acquired brain injury for example. If you have lost 10% of your ability as a result of TBI then you have to put in 110% of the effort you previously gave to reach the same 100% outcome.
This lazy bitch must be so low in ability she will need to put in 400% of the effort a normal person would to get to a normal 100% productivity.
Or perhaps her effort isn't the same as that of others? Nah, that can't be it.
Popular
Back to top

0





