Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us 87k additional armed IRS enforcement agents means one thing | Page 3 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: 87k additional armed IRS enforcement agents means one thing

Posted on 8/14/22 at 9:42 pm to
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
156597 posts
Posted on 8/14/22 at 9:42 pm to
The commies support more fed gov. Shocking.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
156597 posts
Posted on 8/14/22 at 9:56 pm to
quote:

your grandchildren will hate you for what you've done to America


My grandchildren will mock yours for believing men can get pregnant and for have relatives that voted a Potato in for President. You fools.
Posted by The1TrueTiger
Colorado Springs, Colorado
Member since Apr 2009
2560 posts
Posted on 8/14/22 at 10:43 pm to
quote:

Current staffing at the IRS is 78,000. Around 50% of the staff, which includes everything from, auditors, to IT to phone reps, is expected to retire of the next 5 years. So they are expecting to net around 25-30000 total employees of the next ten years which would bring their staffing to levels we seen in previous years.


This is the truth, quit listening to the politicians, they are just fear mongers trying to scare their base.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
127260 posts
Posted on 8/15/22 at 7:01 am to
quote:

Current staffing at the IRS is 78,000. Around 50% of the staff, which includes everything from, auditors, to IT to phone reps, is expected to retire of the next 5 years. So they are expecting to net around 25-30000 total employees of the next ten years which would bring their staffing to levels we seen in previous years.


They’re not budgeting to replace 87k employees.

quote:

the agency would receive $80 billion in funding to hire as many as 87,000 additional employees. The increase would more than double the size of the IRS workforce, which currently has 78,661 full-time staffers, according to federal data.”


But that was a good try.

fricking jagoff.
Posted by jlc05
Member since Nov 2005
33388 posts
Posted on 8/15/22 at 7:07 am to
quote:

Current staffing at the IRS is 78,000. Around 50% of the staff, which includes everything from, auditors, to IT to phone reps, is expected to retire of the next 5 years. So they are expecting to net around 25-30000 total employees of the next ten years which would bring their staffing to levels we seen in previous years.

Wrong. This is not how govt staffing works. Govt agencies never easily give up funded federal authorizations from their baseline. If a position is vacant for an extended time, it’s usually repurposed but remains in the agency’s baseline. The 87K will be positions in addition to those currently on the books, regardless of whether the existing positions are filled or vacant.
Posted by ThuperThumpin
Member since Dec 2013
9166 posts
Posted on 8/15/22 at 8:24 am to
quote:

They’re not budgeting to replace 87k employees


No. Around 50,000 that are eligible to retire in the next 5-10 years. So the budget is to replace them and hire and additional number to bring up the total staffing numbers to around 100,000.

quote:

But that was a good try.


Multiple news outlets were reporting this over the weekend to clarify the issue.

quote:

fricking jagoff.


You can state your rebuttal with out being a shite stain.
Posted by jlc05
Member since Nov 2005
33388 posts
Posted on 8/15/22 at 8:34 am to
Sorry, you're wrong. That isn't how federal budgeting works.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram