- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 8/4/19 at 11:13 am to Goforit
There are posts online that he was a member of the Democrat party, but those profiles were changed.
There are screenshots of this.
There are screenshots of this.
Posted on 8/4/19 at 12:00 pm to Draconian Sanctions
The shooter was a Dem you NPC POS
Posted on 8/4/19 at 12:21 pm to jlc05
Let's start with universal background checks (including person-to-person sales). At least make the people who shouldn't have guns (arrest record, non-citizens, judicial order of incompetence) drive to the hood to get their guns.
Posted on 8/4/19 at 12:36 pm to lalouisiane
Posted on 8/4/19 at 12:47 pm to DarthRebel
These people are mindless idiots
Posted on 8/4/19 at 1:47 pm to DawgCountry
Is there a copy out of the manifesto yet?
Posted on 8/4/19 at 4:44 pm to DarthRebel
This James Childers?
Posted on 8/4/19 at 5:28 pm to lalouisiane
quote:
Let's start with universal background checks (including person-to-person sales). At least make the people who shouldn't have guns (arrest record, non-citizens, judicial order of incompetence) drive to the hood to get their guns.
Obviously doesn't work in the few states that already have such laws so what makes you think it would work nationally? Since UBC's are not enforceable and I can pretty much sell any firearm in my collection to any friend or family member with impunity, what makes you think such a law would be effective?
Posted on 8/4/19 at 5:36 pm to Clames
quote:Because the next law will be law that criminals will follow ...
what makes you think such a law would be effective?
Posted on 8/4/19 at 5:52 pm to DarthRebel
Please be careful around black men ages 16-40, who commit half the violent crime in the country but only make up about 9% of the population.
Posted on 8/4/19 at 7:14 pm to KCT
Is it wrong to not give a frick about these mass shootings? Because I don't give a frick.
If I focused on the deaths of all strangers... my heart would've been weighted down with agony and remorse...years ago.
If I focused on the deaths of all strangers... my heart would've been weighted down with agony and remorse...years ago.
Posted on 8/4/19 at 8:46 pm to lalouisiane
quote:
Let's start with universal background checks (including person-to-person sales).
Thats flat out bullshiit. In New York that meant that if your relative wanted to leave you his guns, that relative had to do a background check on you. If your father suddenly died, his guns were confiscated because the owner could not do a background check. If the family member took them, that person was in position of an illegal firearm.
THAT is a "Universal Background Check".
Posted on 8/4/19 at 8:49 pm to Clames
quote:
I can pretty much sell any firearm in my collection to any friend or family member with impunity, what makes you think such a law would be effective?
It wouldn't have to be effective. It would just have to be a law that was enforced. You would be a criminal if you sold those guns without a background check. Once you were a "gun criminal", you could never legally own a gun.
The first step in this incrementalism is to establish the law.
Posted on 8/5/19 at 4:28 am to Dale51
quote:
Don't you think it's a little odd that everytime there's a shooting idiots start claiming it's a false flag?
Yes, I do. I find it a little odd, but I find some of it to be also rooted in reality. While I don't jump to conclusions on every event, the patterns of mass shootings have, more often than not, involve an individual that has had a need for mental evaluation and guidance, and not to be dismissed, some DRUGS. As one of many that have followed Q, the project is called MKUltra. I'm sure you've heard that before, but I expect you to deflect the topic.
I also find many of these events are time-sensitive to bury possible news that might compromise the scandals of important political figures.
So yes, some tinfoil hats will jump out after every event. Yet, you are quick to ridicule those that believe in a FF event for believing in ANY event to be a FF. Well, sir, you have become a tin-foil hat moron yourself. I saw your other thread. You're just as kooky as the rest of us.
Only, you are so passionate about this topic as to create and engage on multiple threads about how kooky Q followers are. You have become your own conspiracy, or quite possibly, you are being paid for your trolling. The shills on the 8chan, like to post dead body pictures and naked children, that cool with you? I'm guessing not, but hey you go ahead and lie with your fellow spin-meisters. I'm pretty sure Soros is helping pay for the Antifa losers, are you on the take? Hey, you be you!
Posted on 8/5/19 at 6:54 am to mjfrog93
El Paso is a quiet and peaceful city, great place to live. I'd be fine with allowing stop and frisk of white males 20-40 since that is the greatest threat to the general public there.
Posted on 8/5/19 at 7:44 am to TopFlightSecurity
Not at you,,
Mexico is going to sue the USA because 7 Mexicans killed in elpaso.... are we gonna sue them for drugs and illegals?
Mexico is going to sue the USA because 7 Mexicans killed in elpaso.... are we gonna sue them for drugs and illegals?
Posted on 8/5/19 at 8:48 am to Clames
quote:
Obviously doesn't work in the few states that already have such laws so what makes you think it would work nationally? Since UBC's are not enforceable and I can pretty much sell any firearm in my collection to any friend or family member with impunity, what makes you think such a law would be effective?
- Where can I find more information about how background checks "obviously don't work"?
- Background checks should apply to person to person sales also (as stated in my post).
Posted on 8/5/19 at 8:52 am to Dale51
quote:
Thats flat out bullshiit. In New York that meant that if your relative wanted to leave you his guns, that relative had to do a background check on you. If your father suddenly died, his guns were confiscated because the owner could not do a background check. If the family member took them, that person was in position of an illegal firearm.
THAT is a "Universal Background Check".
Just because Pawpaw willed you the gun shouldn't mean that you should get it if there is a good reason for you to not have a gun (again, criminals, non-citizens, persons deemed judicially incompetent). What you described in NY makes 100% sense to me. How hard would it be to go to a registered firearms dealer to approve the sale?
Posted on 8/5/19 at 9:36 am to lalouisiane
quote:Exactly. Just like you should have to prove you aren’t going to say dangerous things before engaging in free speech. And you should have to get the government to approve your church. And we should have a test for voters to ensure they will vote the right way.
Just because Pawpaw willed you the gun shouldn't mean that you should get it if there is a good reason for you to not have a gun (again, criminals, non-citizens, persons deemed judicially incompetent). What you described in NY makes 100% sense to me.
quote:A lot harder than getting a voter ID that’s for sure.
How hard would it be to go to a registered firearms dealer to approve the sale?
Page 17 of 18
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News