- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Amazon cutting 30,000 white collar jobs. UPS cutting 48,000 jobs.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:35 pm to PaperTiger
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:35 pm to PaperTiger
quote:
I mean that shite is unsustainable. Agreeing to that makes no sense.
UPS is a blue collar job and has been paying their drivers extremely well for a long time and they still bring in BILLIONS of proft. I think this points to the opposite and shows that these massive corporations can afford to pay their employees a good wage and still rake in massive profts.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:37 pm to Dot Com
Back in the early 1960s NASA used robotic welders on the fuel tanks of the Saturn V rocket stages.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 3:57 pm to umrebel2009
I thought they would be shipping all these
goods that are now made onshore
I feel lied to
East wing still untouched like he promised
goods that are now made onshore
I feel lied to
East wing still untouched like he promised
Posted on 10/28/25 at 4:01 pm to Tmcgin
quote:
I feel lied to
Why do you think billionaires supported his campaign? He has their interests in mine, not ours.
He lowers their taxes, creates a toothless H1B EO, screws over farmers, etc
I’m begging you all to wake up.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 4:02 pm to Dot Com
Well thankfully the rich will get richer. I’m all for capitalism, but at some point, there has to be a human aspect for it to keep flourishing.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 4:07 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
The UPS job losses are due to tariffs.
You mean labor unions that voted to increase wages that made it unafordable to UPS.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 4:15 pm to Dot Com
These companies are cleaning out corporate bloat in management. All of these companies have like 12 levels of management that just clog stuff up and soak up money. My company cut out like 1000 executive level positions recently and nobody can receive any difference. Those people were contributing nothing
Posted on 10/28/25 at 4:16 pm to Dot Com
Current layoffs have very little to do with AI. It re-benchmarking and re-baselining economies of scale across the ecosystem - mostly a result of piss poor policy from our government as a result of COVID and DEI.
What the CEOs from Nvidia, Palantir and AMD are explaining is that AI allows corporations to expand at a horizontal rather than vertical method to maintain and seize additional market shares. Yes people will lose jobs, but in the long run, more jobs will be created based on the expansion of industry. It’s not much different conceptually in reference to the explosion of factories in the US between 1805-1860. So many manual laborers who weaved cloth, created sails for ships, so and so forth, were replaced by machines. That didn’t mean the industry stayed static from an employment standpoint over time thereafter, the industries just expanded horizontally to do more business, and therefore, require more jobs.
The issue in today’s paradigm should be around monopolies - large caps have a massive advantage over everyone else in terms of the adoption of AI. It’s inherit that we’ll see a consolidation of industry over the next 50 years that will have negative effects on average joes. What the worry should be for all is if our government has enough stones to enact a similar anti-trust act that we observe from the early 1900s to combat this
What the CEOs from Nvidia, Palantir and AMD are explaining is that AI allows corporations to expand at a horizontal rather than vertical method to maintain and seize additional market shares. Yes people will lose jobs, but in the long run, more jobs will be created based on the expansion of industry. It’s not much different conceptually in reference to the explosion of factories in the US between 1805-1860. So many manual laborers who weaved cloth, created sails for ships, so and so forth, were replaced by machines. That didn’t mean the industry stayed static from an employment standpoint over time thereafter, the industries just expanded horizontally to do more business, and therefore, require more jobs.
The issue in today’s paradigm should be around monopolies - large caps have a massive advantage over everyone else in terms of the adoption of AI. It’s inherit that we’ll see a consolidation of industry over the next 50 years that will have negative effects on average joes. What the worry should be for all is if our government has enough stones to enact a similar anti-trust act that we observe from the early 1900s to combat this
Posted on 10/28/25 at 4:19 pm to Dot Com
Well when automated machines came to factories people lost their job but you need guys there to fix the machines. So those guys got jobs.
But maybe you trade 40 people on a line for 2 mechanics.
But maybe you trade 40 people on a line for 2 mechanics.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 4:19 pm to Dot Com
quote:
Meanwhile Nvidia, Palantir, AMD CEO's were all on CNBC today saying how Artificial Intelligence will create jobs, not kill jobs.
fricking liars.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 4:20 pm to el Gaucho
quote:
If you lost your job to a robot were you working that hard to begin with? They could never teach a robot how to weld
Have you seen the new Tesla robots?
Posted on 10/28/25 at 4:21 pm to AUbagman
quote:
Well thankfully the rich will get richer. I’m all for capitalism, but at some point, there has to be a human aspect for it to keep flourishing.
What system has the rich not getting richer?
Posted on 10/28/25 at 4:21 pm to el Gaucho
quote:
Soyboys that can’t run a bead think they can teach a robot to weld
Y’all soft hands need to get back inside with the women before yall burn yallselves
Posted on 10/28/25 at 4:22 pm to Tmcgin
quote:
I thought they would be shipping all these
goods that are now made onshore
I feel lied to
East wing still untouched like he promised
Joe Biden
Posted on 10/28/25 at 4:22 pm to Dot Com
No companies are spending 100's of billions of AI except other BS AI companies. They will use it as the excuse to lay off all the debt weight they've been carrying since COVID though.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 4:26 pm to 94LSU
It might not be 100bb but companies like Fidelity are absolutely investing in AI at a very high level and succeeding.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 4:27 pm to Bamanjo
quote:
Why do you think billionaires supported his campaign? He has their interests in mine, not ours.
He lowers their taxes, creates a toothless H1B EO, screws over farmers, etc
I’m begging you all to wake up.
"His..." "He..."
JFC... Your TDS is off the fricking charts insane. This thread had NOTHING to do with Trump. AI was being developed and was coming with or without Trump. What the frick is your major malfunction, numb nuts? Trump broke your feeble little brain.
Posted on 10/28/25 at 5:00 pm to umrebel2009
AI government coming soon
Posted on 10/28/25 at 5:01 pm to bignuss18
So, when does the hiring start? Because all I’ve seen is bloodbath after bloodbath. Tech is basically being massacred on a regular basis, between the hundreds of thousands laid off of the last few years, outsourcing, and H1Bs. Outside of trades (for now) and healthcare (and not all of it), I don’t see any field that isn’t going to see a decline.
Popular
Back to top


0



