- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/6/26 at 7:43 pm to davyjones
quote:
Umm, you’ve never seen the Democrats turn nothing into something merely by grandstanding and making vague, misleading, baseless insinuations/inferences of wrongdoing by their “target,” all intended for dramatic televised effect?
You mean any politician? Do you watch senate or house hearings? They should be able to get the same information either way, might as well put it out there and avoid the middle man bs.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 8:53 pm to j1897
quote:
think they have both been on the island at the same time. They both know.
No documented inkling that Trump ever went there but keep jerking off. Your boy Bill basically lived there though.
Posted on 2/10/26 at 7:15 pm to MrLSU
quote:
Bill Clinton to Snitch on Trump
MrLSU
In September 2025, House Speaker Mike Johnson initially claimed Trump was an "FBI informant" who helped "take this stuff down." Johnson's office tried to back track hours later saying that Trump "was the only one more than a decade ago willing to help prosecutors expose Epstein." Johnson has said nothing sense after he was called out on this by Trump. Trump himself called out Johnson on Truth Social, saying the claim was "ridiculous" and "not true," but he hasn't addressed it further since.
Trump is playing political jujitsu. Trump (and allies like Musk) have strategically allowed or amplified perceptions of his involvement in the Epstein scandal to bait Democrats into aggressively demanding full document releases under the Epstein Files Transparency Act (signed by Trump in November 2025), only for the files to potentially backfire by exposing more Democratic ties (e.g., to Bill Clinton or donors like Bill Gates, Reid Hoffman).
If Democrats realized Trump had minimal or no incriminating involvement, (or worse he was the confidential informant who helped put Epstein in jail) they would immediately back off to avoid highlighting their own vulnerabilities and wasting political capital on a fight that doesn't deliver the desired anti-Trump bombshell.
This is a savvy, game-theory take on the partisan dynamics
House Democrats, led by figures like Rep. Robert Garcia and Rep. Jamie Raskin, have been releasing selective Epstein emails starting in November 2025 mentioning Trump (e.g., Epstein telling Ghislaine Maxwell that a victim "spent hours" at his house with Trump), explicitly to "raise glaring questions" about Trump's relationship and pressure for broader DOJ releases. They accused the Trump DOJ (under AG Pam Bondi) of redacting or deleting materials, like photos of Trump with Epstein and Maxwell, to shield him—calling it a "White House cover-up."
Trump initially resisted releases, labeling them a "Democrat hoax" designed to target him, but flipped under pressure from both MAGA base and Democrats, signing the bill and directing investigations into Democratic ties (e.g., Clinton, Summers).
This all fits squarely into how Trump operates.
ABC News--told you guys!
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 2/10/26 at 7:26 pm to SoFlaGuy
His voter base will grow.....go ahead Willy!
Posted on 2/10/26 at 7:30 pm to FireawayLSU
quote:
DEMS HAD THE FILES FOR FOUR YEARS
They had them a lot longer than that.
Between Biden and Obummer they had them for 12 years.
Posted on 2/10/26 at 8:05 pm to SoFlaGuy
It depends on the meaning of "IS".
Popular
Back to top


0







