Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Boston 2024 Election turnout | Page 4 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Boston 2024 Election turnout

Posted on 11/23/24 at 8:27 am to
Posted by Warboo
Enterprise Alabama
Member since Sep 2018
5865 posts
Posted on 11/23/24 at 8:27 am to
quote:

In 2024, they only cheated in the areas that were most closely scrutinized, and in the areas where nobody was watching, they decided not to cheat.

Explain to me how that strategy makes sense.


What he is saying is that they cheated in areas where the courts, councils, DA's, etc. are blue. If you are caught manipulating the election the DA will not touch it and the judges will say "no standing". The "I got your back" so you will not go to prison good ole boy network has to be damn near full proof.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471408 posts
Posted on 11/23/24 at 8:29 am to
quote:

Yet you still havent offered a simple answer why there would be so many votes over registered voters.

I am not a Boston elections official so it's not easy to answer that question.

This same argument was made in 2020 with plenty of debunking. We just have to wait for people with actual information to respond. Usually when that happens, it's bad for MAGA-types, and then they just argue the evidence is all fake as a cope. We can watch to see if that pattern unfolds yet again.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471408 posts
Posted on 11/23/24 at 8:30 am to
quote:

What he is saying is that they cheated in areas where the courts, councils, DA's, etc. are blue.

Not across the board in 2024.

The DEMs biggest losses were in super blue areas, in 2024. Mass, California, New York, etc.

Posted by Warboo
Enterprise Alabama
Member since Sep 2018
5865 posts
Posted on 11/23/24 at 8:34 am to
quote:

Not across the board in 2024.

The DEMs biggest losses were in super blue areas, in 2024. Mass, California, New York, etc.



Imagine how much bigger the losses would have been had those places not turned out over 200%!!! Hell they may have lost control of DA's, courts, councils etc. Just imagine.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
79110 posts
Posted on 11/23/24 at 8:35 am to
quote:


A logical person would figure out how these numbers are possible without fraud. It's probably not that complicated
That's why I'm wondering what this really means?
quote:

Note: Percentages are based on a two-card per voter scan, therefore the percentage is not accurate if divided in half. It's just an estimated turnout
Before I get pissed off, I'd like to understand how the numbers were calculated.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471408 posts
Posted on 11/23/24 at 8:38 am to
quote:

Before I get pissed off, I'd like to understand how the numbers were calculated.


A reasonable starting point
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471408 posts
Posted on 11/23/24 at 8:38 am to
quote:

Imagine how much bigger the losses would have been had those places not turned out over 200%!!! Hell they may have lost control of DA's, courts, councils etc. Just imagine.




When proven wrong, just add another layer to the conspiracy
Posted by Warboo
Enterprise Alabama
Member since Sep 2018
5865 posts
Posted on 11/23/24 at 8:50 am to
quote:

When proven wrong, just add another layer to the conspiracy


Where was I proven wrong? Please show me counselor.
Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
8169 posts
Posted on 11/23/24 at 9:02 am to
I think there is a plausible argument that over 100% voter turnout in a federal election is a federal issue that would allow investigation of the ballot and the registered voters

That would spark mass chaos in Boston
Posted by Warboo
Enterprise Alabama
Member since Sep 2018
5865 posts
Posted on 11/23/24 at 9:06 am to
quote:

I think there is a plausible argument that over 100% voter turnout in a federal election is a federal issue that would allow investigation of the ballot and the registered voters

That would spark mass chaos in Boston


Jan. 20 let the chaos begin.
Posted by HoopsAurora
Member since Apr 2024
1880 posts
Posted on 11/23/24 at 10:40 am to
quote:

Elon Musk said that only paper ballots because any electronic device can be hacked and manipulated.


Def paper ballots with watermarks or barcodes or something that can verify they are legitimate ballots so some dem operatives can’t make thousands in a warehouse somewhere.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
75302 posts
Posted on 11/23/24 at 10:47 am to
He cracked the foundation. Time will tell of the results.
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
87556 posts
Posted on 11/23/24 at 10:54 am to
quote:


A logical person would figure out how these numbers are possible without fraud.
In many many areas!
Posted by LSUSkip
Central, LA
Member since Jul 2012
24717 posts
Posted on 11/23/24 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

People vote. Land doesn't.



As what i alluded to, in Cali, you have the mass of Democrats in LA. You don't have to win another vote anywhere else in the state. That isn't the own you think it is.
Posted by Mutt Myers
Member since Jan 2024
519 posts
Posted on 11/23/24 at 6:17 pm to
Need to start putting asses in jail and pull out a billy club if needed. That’s 3rd world.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram