- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Boston 2024 Election turnout
Posted on 11/23/24 at 8:27 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 11/23/24 at 8:27 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
In 2024, they only cheated in the areas that were most closely scrutinized, and in the areas where nobody was watching, they decided not to cheat.
Explain to me how that strategy makes sense.
What he is saying is that they cheated in areas where the courts, councils, DA's, etc. are blue. If you are caught manipulating the election the DA will not touch it and the judges will say "no standing". The "I got your back" so you will not go to prison good ole boy network has to be damn near full proof.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 8:29 am to trinidadtiger
quote:
Yet you still havent offered a simple answer why there would be so many votes over registered voters.
I am not a Boston elections official so it's not easy to answer that question.
This same argument was made in 2020 with plenty of debunking. We just have to wait for people with actual information to respond. Usually when that happens, it's bad for MAGA-types, and then they just argue the evidence is all fake as a cope. We can watch to see if that pattern unfolds yet again.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 8:30 am to Warboo
quote:
What he is saying is that they cheated in areas where the courts, councils, DA's, etc. are blue.
Not across the board in 2024.
The DEMs biggest losses were in super blue areas, in 2024. Mass, California, New York, etc.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 8:34 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Not across the board in 2024.
The DEMs biggest losses were in super blue areas, in 2024. Mass, California, New York, etc.
Imagine how much bigger the losses would have been had those places not turned out over 200%!!! Hell they may have lost control of DA's, courts, councils etc. Just imagine.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 8:35 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:That's why I'm wondering what this really means?
A logical person would figure out how these numbers are possible without fraud. It's probably not that complicated
quote:Before I get pissed off, I'd like to understand how the numbers were calculated.
Note: Percentages are based on a two-card per voter scan, therefore the percentage is not accurate if divided in half. It's just an estimated turnout
Posted on 11/23/24 at 8:38 am to Jake88
quote:
Before I get pissed off, I'd like to understand how the numbers were calculated.
A reasonable starting point
Posted on 11/23/24 at 8:38 am to Warboo
quote:
Imagine how much bigger the losses would have been had those places not turned out over 200%!!! Hell they may have lost control of DA's, courts, councils etc. Just imagine.
When proven wrong, just add another layer to the conspiracy
Posted on 11/23/24 at 8:50 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
When proven wrong, just add another layer to the conspiracy
Where was I proven wrong? Please show me counselor.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 9:02 am to John Barron
I think there is a plausible argument that over 100% voter turnout in a federal election is a federal issue that would allow investigation of the ballot and the registered voters
That would spark mass chaos in Boston
That would spark mass chaos in Boston
Posted on 11/23/24 at 9:06 am to dafif
quote:
I think there is a plausible argument that over 100% voter turnout in a federal election is a federal issue that would allow investigation of the ballot and the registered voters
That would spark mass chaos in Boston
Jan. 20 let the chaos begin.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 10:40 am to Auburn1968
quote:
Elon Musk said that only paper ballots because any electronic device can be hacked and manipulated.
Def paper ballots with watermarks or barcodes or something that can verify they are legitimate ballots so some dem operatives can’t make thousands in a warehouse somewhere.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 10:47 am to crossfire
He cracked the foundation. Time will tell of the results.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 10:54 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
A logical person would figure out how these numbers are possible without fraud.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 5:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
People vote. Land doesn't.
As what i alluded to, in Cali, you have the mass of Democrats in LA. You don't have to win another vote anywhere else in the state. That isn't the own you think it is.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 6:17 pm to John Barron
Need to start putting asses in jail and pull out a billy club if needed. That’s 3rd world.
Popular
Back to top

1






