- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dilbert/Scott Adams has Advanced Prostate Cancer
Posted on 5/19/25 at 12:30 pm to beaux duke
Posted on 5/19/25 at 12:30 pm to beaux duke
Yes, sorry beyond some people's comprehension.
1
Posted on 5/19/25 at 1:04 pm to Hognutz
quote:
Not saying the jab is responsible but you certainly have to consider the possibility, imho.
Do you even look at prostate cancer statistics before providing your HO? There is absolutely zero change in the prevailing trend since about 2014.
Cancer Stat Facts: Prostate Cancer
Posted on 5/19/25 at 3:49 pm to Hognutz
quote:
Yes, sorry beyond some people's comprehension.
that's one way to phrase it i suppose
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:04 pm to beaux duke
Grok has access to all published science in order to reach it's conclusions. Virology is undoubtedly based of logical fallacies.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 6:08 pm to PeleofAnalytics
Are you aware there's been a rapid increase of late stage cancers over the past 4 years or so especially in younger demographics? Not saying that's the case with Scott though, but it does make me wonder as I stated.
This post was edited on 5/19/25 at 6:09 pm
Posted on 5/20/25 at 9:15 am to Hognutz
quote:
Are you aware there's been a rapid increase of late stage cancers over the past 4 years or so especially in younger demographics?
If you lump all cancers together, there is an increase, but every single type of cancer is different. You don't get mesothelioma from tanning beds and you don't get skin cancer from asbestos exposure.
The graph for prostate cancer actually shows a slight decrease in deaths so there is absolutely zero way there is an increase in stage 4 prostate cancer, even if you are only pointing to a subset of a younger demographics. The likelihood that you can get a slight decrease in deaths while there is an increase in stage 4 prostate cancer anywhere in the population is astronomically small. Looking at some inexplicit graph that lumps every type of cancer together is irrelevant when you know we are talking about this one particular cancer that shows absolutely zero correlation with the covid vaccine.
When you automatically say "you certainly have to consider the possibility", why not just take 10 seconds and look at the graph on prostate cancer? It is easy to find and follow. You certainly can consider the possibility so why not take 10 seconds and observe the data that shows it is astronomically unlikely that prostate cancer has anything to do with the vaccine. It would help avoid you considering possibilities that really don't exist.
The knee jerk "you have to consider" to every death these days is just tiresome and shows no desire to actually take 10 seconds and say "huh... i guess this type of cancer has about zero chance of being vaccine related"
This post was edited on 5/20/25 at 9:59 am
Posted on 5/21/25 at 11:54 am to PeleofAnalytics
Fine, and there's also some irony here as many of the increases in cancers that can reasonably be associated with the cv19 vaccines could have been avoided with a little more effort by those who took them to look deeper as well.
Posted on 5/21/25 at 12:00 pm to ItzMe1972
We don't know how many shows he has left.
But here is today's with a summary.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
If you prefer reading,
here’s a shorter summary of todays coffee talk:
He opened with coffee jokes and AI friends
- Joked that Meta’s AI buddy might replace human connection for lonely men
- Says he’d probably try it. Why not
Microsoft’s AI updates are confusing
- Too much jargon, only engineers understand
- If you can’t explain it simply, it’s not ready to replace humans
Robot chores? Not ready
- He watched Optimus (Tesla’s bot) attempt household tasks
- Said people will just argue with it like they do over garbage or dishwasher rules
Gas prices dropping for summer
- Under $3 in most states (except CA)
- First time since 2021
Biden’s autopilot presidency theory
- Scott thinks staff may be signing policies without him fully aware
- Raises big questions if Biden believed one thing but his team did the opposite
The Tapper/Thompson book drops
- Claims Biden ran again because he thought Trump would be jailed
- Hunter Biden was reportedly acting as “chief of staff” for the family
- Fake town hall in 2024 was so bad they couldn’t use a single clip
Media gaslighting gets layered
- Trump = Hitler narrative ? allowed them to justify Biden’s decline
- Scott calls it a 3-layer lie: fine people hoax ? Hitler label ? Biden brain cover-up
Target sales tank
- Could be a slow mega-boycott
- But unclear if it’s just culture backlash or wider economic pressure
Nancy Mace shows censored images of herself in Congress
- Suing ex-fiancé for revenge porn
- Scott praises her for using “freedom from embarrassment” as power
Republican budget = PR win but debt bomb
- Eliminates taxes on tips and boosts child tax credits
- But explodes national debt
- Scott says if it passes, Trump’s presidency would be a failure
He finishes with a reminder:
- Most people’s opinions are assigned to them
- Recognizing that is the beginning of critical thinking
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News