- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Elon Musk says WFH is morally wrong
Posted on 11/19/24 at 10:49 am to John Barron
Posted on 11/19/24 at 10:49 am to John Barron
quote:
Incorrect, if you are on the clock running groceries and to the gym.
Salaried employees, who much are most of the WFH people, have been expected to be “on the clock” at most hours of the day for decades. If someone wants to run to the grocery store and take their work phone with them, there should be zero backlash for that.
0
Posted on 11/19/24 at 10:50 am to geauxcoco
He's trolling you. There is no correct answer than absolutely agreeing with him. He doesn't process there are different situations for everyone because that eliminates the troll.
Posted on 11/19/24 at 11:33 am to Mick Hogger
Pelosi is another WFH fraudster. Elon is about to drop the hammer. I didn't have Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos teaming up to get rid of WFH on my bingo card
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 11/19/24 at 11:34 am to John Barron
But she gets her work done.
Nevermind that the amount of work she's expected to do is calibrated to the fact that she actually doesn't work there.
Nevermind that the amount of work she's expected to do is calibrated to the fact that she actually doesn't work there.
Posted on 11/19/24 at 11:38 am to John Barron
quote:
have a kid with several chronic illnesses that she deals with, thank God I can work from home.
You are not WFH. You are taking care of your kid
Let me introduce you to the Reasonable Accomodation world.
Posted on 11/19/24 at 11:42 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If y'all have any questions about what I am like IRL, EZE has met me
I’ll say nice things if you support me working from home
This post was edited on 11/19/24 at 11:43 am
Posted on 11/19/24 at 11:46 am to John Barron
quote:
You are not WFH. You are taking care of your kid
You have no way of knowing this at all.
Posted on 11/19/24 at 1:08 pm to Diego Ricardo
Something to chew on...
Posted on 11/19/24 at 1:09 pm to EZE Tiger Fan
quote:
You have no way of knowing this at all.
You're so close to figuring this out.
Posted on 11/19/24 at 1:12 pm to EZE Tiger Fan
quote:
I’ll say nice things if you support me working from home
Already ahead of you, brother
Posted on 11/19/24 at 1:13 pm to wackatimesthree
Just my opinion, leadership should have quantifiable indicators of performance that doesn't lead to the question whether the employee is walking their dog or rocking their baby instead of working.
If a company can't derive success metrics and their solution is just install the wage cage then they'll surely fail in some other way down the line.
If a company can't derive success metrics and their solution is just install the wage cage then they'll surely fail in some other way down the line.
Posted on 11/19/24 at 1:13 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
You're so close to figuring this out.
It seems you're referencing the lack of supervision being an issue creating externalities related to this "not knowing".
I'm sure their employers know if their work was completed, though, which is all that matters.
Posted on 11/19/24 at 1:14 pm to Diego Ricardo
quote:
Just my opinion, leadership should have quantifiable indicators of performance that doesn't lead to the question whether the employee is walking their dog or rocking their baby instead of working.
Your opinion represents a much better understanding of value, efficiency, and productivity than those defaulting to an hourly mindset.
This post was edited on 11/19/24 at 1:15 pm
Posted on 11/19/24 at 1:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Your opinion represents a much better understanding of value, efficiency, and productivity and those defaulting to an hourly mindset.
How are you going to terminate poor performers without burdening middle management into mall copping their problematic reports - thus creating a management inefficiency knock-on effect - without having success criteria that is clear to everyone from the top to the bottom of the organization?
You've got to do this so performance-based terminations do not turn into HR litigation nightmares. So, if you can't deduce an employee is not performing to their expectations in a remote-work situation then how the hell are you going to fire them if they sit in a cube all day?
This post was edited on 11/19/24 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 11/19/24 at 1:20 pm to Diego Ricardo
quote:
How are you going to terminate poor performers without burdening middle management into mall copping their problematic reports - thus creating a management inefficiency knock-on effect - without having success criteria that is clear to everyone from the top to the bottom of the organization?
quote:
You've got to do this so performance-based terminations do not turn into HR litigation nightmares. So, if you can't deduce an employee is not performing to their expectations in a remote-work situation then how the hell are you going to fire them if they sit in a cube all day?
Posted on 11/19/24 at 1:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 11/19/24 at 1:23 pm to Diego Ricardo
Can you explain this in an hourly vernacular for John Barron?
Posted on 11/19/24 at 1:48 pm to lsuguy84
quote:
Can you explain this in an hourly vernacular for John Barron?
Sure: you're not paying a software engineer to sit in cube with nothing to do. Additionally, it doesn't matter if they put in 40 hours but shite still don't work.
Posted on 11/19/24 at 1:54 pm to Diego Ricardo
quote:
you're not paying a software engineer to sit in cube with nothing to do.
You are also not paying them to shop for groceries or go to the gym while on the clock. WFH fraudsters love to work half the time but say my work is complete. Good, we will cut your salary in half and pay you for the 20 hours you worked this week.
Posted on 11/19/24 at 2:03 pm to John Barron
quote:
You are also not paying them to shop for groceries or go to the gym while on the clock. WFH fraudsters love to work half the time but say my work is complete. Good, we will cut your salary in half and pay you for the 20 hours you worked this week.
Lets say we have two employees working for the same company:
Employee A work 40 hours in a week. Employee A produce 20k of value for the company in the week.
Employee B works 20 real hours but was available for 40 hours during the week. Employee B produces 200k of value for the company in the week.
Who do you think the ownership values more? What would be the rational distribution of their revenues?
Page 30 of 36
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News