- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Finally your definitive proof that Tucker has become a whack job
Posted on 1/5/26 at 9:10 am to GreatLakesTiger24
Posted on 1/5/26 at 9:10 am to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
on here and twitter, I’ve seen accounts posting old TC and NF clips and dishonestly framing them as being new
Somebody is providing the Coin for this shite… maybe Geek can tell us who.
Posted on 1/5/26 at 9:11 am to Geekboy
Well... They want Maria Machado as the president of Venezuela. She's the Israeli backed candidate and she will do whatever she's told to do once she is placed in power.
Posted on 1/5/26 at 9:13 am to SallysHuman
quote:
Oh, you mean POLITICIANS.
Yeah, I didn't understand that until he replied to you either, since we've been talking about posters on a message board.
So politicians seeking election conceal their true motivations and tailor their message toward what is palatable rather than what is unpopular.
You don't say?
Posted on 1/5/26 at 9:32 am to roadGator
quote:
We lead the world in wack job shite like pregnant men care
He’s kinda right.
Our country isn’t a beacon on the hill for conservatism unfortunately.
It's cool that Venezuala is against gays and abortion, but when I evaluate a country for its level of conservatism, the first thing I look at are its economic policies.
If a country is communist, then I don't really care how unfriendly to queers they are.
It's insane to praise communists and muslims for their social conservatism when so many of their other policies are antithetical to conservatism.
Did you hear? Venezuala limits private property, kills dissidents, prohibits guns, and has no free speech, but they don't have LGBT parades, so look how conservative they are!
It makes no sense to praise these dictatorial countries for their social conservatism when you would never want to live there.
Posted on 1/5/26 at 9:34 am to SallysHuman
quote:
Oh, you mean POLITICIANS.
No. I'm talking about the voters.
quote:
Taqqiya is a Muslim thing
Centered around hiding one's beliefs to deceive, which is exactly what I'm describing here.
This post was edited on 1/5/26 at 9:34 am
Posted on 1/5/26 at 9:35 am to SallysHuman
quote:
Geekboy has been frothing on Tucker lately…
That's his/her role as part of the Loomer-Levin Youth Brigade.
Posted on 1/5/26 at 9:35 am to Geekboy
Yall didnt figure this out when he said demons slashed his rib cage?
Posted on 1/5/26 at 9:36 am to SlowFlowPro
SFP...
You know exactly what you're doing when you invoke the term "taqqiya" so as to describe Christians.
Just stop it. It's wrong, it's offensive and it serves no purpose.
Being an attorney I would assume you'd be more precise in your use of language.
You know exactly what you're doing when you invoke the term "taqqiya" so as to describe Christians.
Just stop it. It's wrong, it's offensive and it serves no purpose.
Being an attorney I would assume you'd be more precise in your use of language.
Posted on 1/5/26 at 9:36 am to LSUnation78
quote:
Yall didnt figure this out when he said demons slashed his rib cage?
A reminder
quote:
"We are very, very close to being able to ignore Trump most nights," he wrote in a text sent on 4 January 2021. "I truly can't wait."
"I hate him passionately," he added.
quote:
"That's the last four years. We're all pretending we've got a lot to show for it, because admitting what a disaster it's been is too tough to digest. But come on. There isn't really an upside to Trump."
Posted on 1/5/26 at 9:37 am to SallysHuman
quote:
Somebody is providing the Coin for this shite… maybe Geek can tell us who.
Ha! Yup.
Gee, I wonder who. Or what. There are a few bots here trying to demonize and destroy reps and steering ALL narratives.
Posted on 1/5/26 at 9:37 am to SallysHuman
quote:
And we can take his word for it, or not… I don’t see any reason to doubt that it either happened or that he believes it happened.
Did you do what I recommended and look it up for yourself?
If you actually view the interview in which he recounts that story and take everything into account, including his body language and tone and the way the account even came up in the first place, as well as whether or not the behavior of the "demons" he concludes scratched him up is consistent with the theology of reliable theological sources, and come away from it thinking that it is the credible account of a sincere witness, then we'll simply have to agree to disagree.
quote:
And we can take his word for it, or not
Having watched the interview, I vote not.
quote:
It’s not like it can be proven or disproven.
Very few things can be definitively proven (more can be disproven, but even that is relatively rare). The vast majority of the time we have to rely on evidence, not proof, and choosing whether or not to give this guy the benefit of the doubt on this account falls squarely into that realm.
Again, we have his track record. That guy will say anything for a buck. I've been saying that for many years, now lots of other people are starting to figure it out as well.
We have theological sources and clerical sources that have developed theories and theology and some with reported personal experience with these things that we can compare his story to.
And we have the interview, including the fact that the interview provides a much more plausible theory (the 4 dogs in the bed scratched him, not demons) that conforms better with Occam's Razor by orders of magnitude.
Having concluded the available evidence my conclusion is that he said all that because he knows a great portion of his audience believes in it and nothing more.
You may conclude otherwise. But I would issue this challenge...imagine contacting the Catholic Church—who has clergy trained to investigate these sorts of things—and asking them whether they think there is enough evidence to warrant an investigation of this one. My imagination tells me that there would not be.
In any case, because all we have is evidence and not proof, that's no reason to say, "Well, hell, we can't know for sure, so I guess best thing to to do is take him at his word." In fact, I'm sure a brief mental application of that as a guiding principle to a variety of situations would quickly reveal why that would be a bad idea.
Posted on 1/5/26 at 9:37 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:fify
Centered around hiding one's beliefs to deceive, which is exactly what I'm doing here.
Posted on 1/5/26 at 9:38 am to SlowFlowPro
SFP... Who cares what Tucker does or doesn't think about Trump?
Here's where you progressives lose the plot... Trump isn't a god to most of his voters.
Here's where you progressives lose the plot... Trump isn't a god to most of his voters.
Posted on 1/5/26 at 9:39 am to Geekboy
Tucker, Candace, and Fuentes are three peas in the crazy pod.
Posted on 1/5/26 at 9:40 am to SallysHuman
quote:
SFP... Who cares what Tucker does or doesn't think about Trump?
There is a difference in the person Tucker Carlson and the content creator Tucker Carlson. What he says publicly likely isn't sincere in any way and he's just trying to get views/clicks.
When those texts were revealed we got the "changed his mind" or "learned more" spin. It's not that at all, as he keeps "changing his mind" to more provocative stuff to pander to the worst of the MAGA base.
This post was edited on 1/5/26 at 9:41 am
Posted on 1/5/26 at 9:41 am to Saint Alfonzo
quote:
Tucker, Candace, and Fuentes are three peas in the crazy pod.
Their content personas are, at least...and likely a large portion of their followings.
Posted on 1/5/26 at 9:45 am to SallysHuman
quote:
Trump isn't a god to most of his voters.
The hell he's not.
The fact that this board has done a complete 180 on American interventionism in a few days time when American hegemony was one of the most hotly hated principles up for discussion on here for five years, just because Trump and no one else engaged in it pretty much crushes that statement.
quote:
Here's where you progressives lose the plot
And again, more evidence. Someone disagree with you, so they are a "progressive." SFP is more conservative than almost every other poster on this board. So am I.
quote:
Who cares what Tucker does or doesn't think about Trump?
You would think the people who have worshipped at the feet of both for the past 10 years. But I have another post somewhere explaining why all of a sudden, what Huckster says doesn't matter. It's you rightist populist's version of intersectionality. Huckster is down on the rightist populist intersectionality totem pole compared to Trump (as is everyone else...Trump is at the top).
This post was edited on 1/5/26 at 9:47 am
Posted on 1/5/26 at 9:46 am to Geekboy
quote:He has been a wack job for 20 years.
Finally your definitive proof that Tucker has become a whack job
Posted on 1/5/26 at 9:47 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
He has been a wack job for 20 years.
Amen.
Posted on 1/5/26 at 9:47 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
You would think the people who have worshipped at the feet of both for the past 10 years. But I have another post somewhere explaining why all of a sudden, what Huckster says doesn't matter. It's you rightist populist's version of intersectionality. Huckster is down on the totem pole compared to Trump.
Or maybe this is the inherent problem in believing that everyone is really the caricature you actually think they are.
Popular
Back to top



1








