- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fox alert: Barr does not foresee Obama or Biden being investigated by Durham
Posted on 5/18/20 at 11:28 am to tigerinDC09
Posted on 5/18/20 at 11:28 am to tigerinDC09
Nice edit. 
Posted on 5/18/20 at 11:28 am to Jbird
quote:
For what DCtard09?
The most obvious thing is for the criminal act he directed Micheal Cohen to perform on his behalf and benefit.
Posted on 5/18/20 at 11:29 am to tigerinDC09
quote:I think the optics of the first black president being indicted by a bunch of white lawyers and doj officials wouldn't be good politically for trump.
This is good for Trump.
would juice black turnout imo.
Posted on 5/18/20 at 11:31 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
When Trump says that Obama and Biden committed crimes.
The AG contradicts him by saying they won't be investigated.
Obama and Biden may have committed crimes, but they're too high profile to prosecute on "may have". plus the press will spin it into political prosecutions. taking them off the table guts the "political prosecution" narrative while losing little (due to the risky nature of the likelihood of convicting Obama or Biden)
quote:
If Barr ascribes to Trump's thinking that Obama/Biden broke the law, then he's saying that they are now Above the Law.
they clearly are, especially with the media filtering information to the majority of the country
same with Hillary
This post was edited on 5/18/20 at 11:31 am
Posted on 5/18/20 at 11:31 am to tigerinDC09
Hard to grasp how bad team trump has been setting the PR for the last 3+ years
I have no doubt Biden will unleash his justice department on trump if he wins so I don’t understand why Barr wouldn’t just say let the facts go where they go, You would think trump isn’t dumb and would realize not to trust folks like comey who told him he wasn’t a target
are Those some type of folks now telling him to be cool with their ongoing investigation and let’s just wait this out and don’t declassify a bunch of stuff. In the meantime, Obama Biden polls numbers rise since they get no negative pushback
I have no doubt Biden will unleash his justice department on trump if he wins so I don’t understand why Barr wouldn’t just say let the facts go where they go, You would think trump isn’t dumb and would realize not to trust folks like comey who told him he wasn’t a target
This post was edited on 5/18/20 at 11:47 am
Posted on 5/18/20 at 11:32 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
The most obvious thing is for the criminal act he directed Micheal Cohen to perform on his behalf and benefit.
Posted on 5/18/20 at 11:32 am to ELVIS U
quote:
If they arrest the ex-President you know what the democrats will do when they, god forbid, win the Presidency back.
You might as well get your licks in first, because the Dems are not going to play by any rules, established or unwritten.
Posted on 5/18/20 at 11:33 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
tigerinDC09
You have literally been wrong for 3.5 years now!
About everything!
Posted on 5/18/20 at 11:33 am to Jimmy2shoes
I am seriously disappointed in some of you idiots.
you truly thought john durham was going to indict Obama? How delusional are you people?
This is what happens when you don't actually read news articles and get your info from headlines and fake sites.
Be better, people!
you truly thought john durham was going to indict Obama? How delusional are you people?
This is what happens when you don't actually read news articles and get your info from headlines and fake sites.
Be better, people!
Posted on 5/18/20 at 11:33 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
The most obvious thing is for the criminal act he directed Micheal Cohen to perform on his behalf and benefit.
Your IQ level must be so low. No wonder you have a Gov job
Posted on 5/18/20 at 11:34 am to 225bred
If true, i hope the Trump administration is tapping wires and developing a plan to take down the next incoming president with years of harassment, investigations, and leaks.
Posted on 5/18/20 at 11:34 am to tigerinDC09
Bumped a ton of your idiotic threads, all were failures of epic proportions, this time you just know you will be right. 
Posted on 5/18/20 at 11:35 am to 225bred
I don't think an ex President or VP would ever be indicted for a crime. And It would be almost impossible to prove.
What Barr is saying that it also would be too divisive.
It's political folks. Go vote and get all of your friends and family to vote.
What Barr is saying that it also would be too divisive.
It's political folks. Go vote and get all of your friends and family to vote.
Posted on 5/18/20 at 11:37 am to GumboPot
quote:
This shouldn't be shocking. TBH, I don't know what crimes Obama or Biden could be charged with. Anyone have an answer to this? The unmasking request of Mike Flynn are not illegal. Unethical? Sure. Abuse of power? Sure. But there is no law against that.
They also do not want to set the precedent of a former president being prosecuted after leaving office. Would make it difficult for future presidents to perform the duties of the presidency if every decision had to be weighed on whether it could be construed by the opposition party as something prosecutable even if it was legal at the time. Just an extension of the reason a president is immune from prosecution while in office.
Posted on 5/18/20 at 11:37 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
On the first page of this thread, you were gloating that this means you are right that nothing will happen to anybody
But Barr literally says today that there are people under criminal investigation
I've said from day 1 that no "big fish" will ever get hooked and booked.
I'll wager that even the small fish will never see the inside of a courtroom. There isn't a grand jury in DC that will ever indict these people.
Grow up, Peter Pan. This is reality.
Posted on 5/18/20 at 11:38 am to upgrayedd
quote:
This board called me every name in the book for saying this would happen
The fat lady has not begun to sing.
Do you leave games in the 3rd quarter?
I have no way of knowing what will happen down the road. Do you?
Posted on 5/18/20 at 11:39 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
The most obvious thing is for the criminal act he directed Micheal Cohen to perform on his behalf and benefit.
Holy shite, you're circling back to this dipshit?
Jesus Christ. I think it's time for muh taxes to pop into the rotation.
Posted on 5/18/20 at 11:40 am to upgrayedd
Yeah, I think it's folly to believe Obama or Biden would be pursued criminally. But, somebody in the FBI needs to pay for the frickery on Flynn, preferably Strzok. I hope somebody can prove Brennan ran an intel op with foreign agencies, but I'm not holding out hope on that.
Posted on 5/18/20 at 11:41 am to cajuncarguy
All,
You need to listen to Barr before posting here.
He said that others are being looked at for breaking the law in a criminal way.
But, the big thing he said was that just because someone "Abused their Power doesn't necessarily mean they broke the law"
He said they will only bring charges if they can prove beyond a reasonable doubt of criminal law breaking.
He said from what he knows RIGHT NOW, that neither Obama or Biden are being looked at for criminal charges.
-That means that there is nothing today that shows either man could be charged with something that he can prove.
You need to listen to Barr before posting here.
He said that others are being looked at for breaking the law in a criminal way.
But, the big thing he said was that just because someone "Abused their Power doesn't necessarily mean they broke the law"
He said they will only bring charges if they can prove beyond a reasonable doubt of criminal law breaking.
He said from what he knows RIGHT NOW, that neither Obama or Biden are being looked at for criminal charges.
-That means that there is nothing today that shows either man could be charged with something that he can prove.
Popular
Back to top


0










