Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Fulton County admits they did not follow the rules. | Page 12 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Fulton County admits they did not follow the rules.

Posted on 12/22/25 at 6:53 pm to
Posted by Placekicker
Florida
Member since Jan 2016
13456 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 6:53 pm to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.



A. Secretary of State Raffensperger refuses to testify under oath about the security of his own Dominion rigging machines.

B. Instead, the Secretary of State sent a threatening letter to counties instructing them not to allow a forensic examination of the Dominion machines.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471785 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 6:55 pm to
Man you're dumb.

I even broke it down for you

This comment

quote:

Due to the clerical error, Trump could have won GA.


was covered here

quote:

Other than the formalistic-legal options for invalidation,


and has no net impact on the votes cast on election day in Fulton County



Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471785 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 6:57 pm to
quote:

Something changed from 2020 to 2024


What changed:

Posted by Stat M Repairman
Member since Jun 2023
2065 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 6:59 pm to
Let’s take a moment to commend the outstanding leadership of Fulton Co, GA for their timely investigation.

Standing true to their motto …

‘Fulton — minutes ahead when seconds count’
Posted by Kjnstkmn
Vermilion Parish
Member since Aug 2020
21225 posts
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:27 pm to
Posted by UncleFestersLegs
Member since Nov 2010
16863 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 4:59 am to
quote:

Man you're dumb.
quote:

Posted by SlowFlowPro

Due to the clerical error, Trump could have won GA.
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
26317 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 5:02 am to
Fulton County 524k votes in 2020, 537k votes in 2024.

315k votes weren't faked.

Kamala got 3k more votes than Biden
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 5:04 am
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471785 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:18 am to
This thread is a basic intelligence and reading test and many have failed.
Posted by G2160
houston
Member since May 2013
2288 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:43 am to
What proof do you have that the measures to properly conduct the voting process were taken without the clerical steps?
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 6:45 am
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
40907 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:47 am to
They have is a stack of ballots they hand recounted, but no one can verify the chain of custody.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471785 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:49 am to
quote:

What proof do you have that the measures to properly conduct the voting process were taken without the clerical steps?


You know there were recounts and post-election analyses out the arse in GA, right?

If the machines were actually not at 0 at the point where they failed to get the proper signature certifying that status, the recounts for Fulton County wouldn't have lined up. After at least 3 recounts, the election was certified.

LINK

quote:

Georgia’s top elections official on Monday recertified the state’s election results after a recount requested by President Donald Trump confirmed once again that Democrat Joe Biden won the state, and the governor then recertified the state’s 16 presidential electors.

“We have now counted legally cast ballots three times, and the results remain unchanged,” Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger said during a news conference at the state Capitol before the results were recertified.


There is even a process if the numbers don't line up, which was done

quote:

During the recount, which was done using scanners that read and tally the votes, there were discrepancies in vote totals in some counties. Since the results of a recount become the official results, those counties had to recertify their results. Once that was done the secretary of state recertified the statewide results, his office said in a news release.


After three recounts, this is the impact in Fulton, specifically:

quote:

The total number of votes in the recount results certified Monday and posted on the secretary of state’s website was 766 fewer than the number certified when the ballots were first tallied after the election. Biden’s lead dropped from 12,670 to 11,779. That appears to be largely due to a discrepancy in Fulton County, the state’s most populous county that includes most of Atlanta.


So, even assuming all of these votes were due to non-zero machines (which isn't even alleged by the people pushing this story), it was 766, not 315k.
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
88043 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:50 am to
Chan of custody isn't a big deal

Old news

Slowtabulationpro
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471785 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:50 am to
quote:

but no one can verify the chain of custody.


Can you describe how chain of custody specifically applies, or is a particular concern, to this story about the 315k votes?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
137214 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:52 am to
quote:

Can you describe how chain of custody specifically applies
Sans signatures, there is no chain of custody. Why do you ask?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471785 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:54 am to
quote:

Sans signatures, there is no chain of custody.


The signatures at issue here have nothing to do with chain of custody, though.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
137214 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 7:18 am to
quote:

You know there were recounts and post-election analyses out the arse in GA, right?
You know less of those details than you should.

Regardless, for example, after a GA 2022 primary, initial DVS machine results showed zero Election Day votes for a candidate, Michelle Long Spears, in all but seven precincts — including in her own precinct where she knew she and her husband had voted.

An initial machine recount, as with the 2020 processes, generated an identical result --- zero votes in all but seven precincts. Eventually a "programming error" was identified. When corrected, Spears won the election. There were numerous issues with the Raffensperger recounts in 2020.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
137214 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 7:19 am to
quote:

The signatures at issue here have nothing to do with chain of custody, though.
Other than the fact there is no documentation of chain of custody, therefore no chain of custody?
Posted by G2160
houston
Member since May 2013
2288 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 7:21 am to
quote:

Can you describe how chain of custody specifically applies, or is a particular concern, to this story about the 315k votes?


Can you describe why the clerical steps were supposed to have been included as part of the certification of the count?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471785 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 7:21 am to
quote:

Other than the fact there is no documentation of chain of custody, therefore no chain of custody?


I'll repeat the question

quote:

Can you describe how chain of custody specifically applies, or is a particular concern, to this story about the 315k votes?


You're trying to discuss another potential issue and not the story about the 315k votes. I"m only asking about the story about the 315k votes
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
471785 posts
Posted on 12/23/25 at 7:22 am to
quote:

Can you describe why the clerical steps were supposed to have been included as part of the certification of the count?


Government workers are a particular kind of idiot, is my best guess
Jump to page
Page First 10 11 12 13 14 ... 18
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 18Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram