- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fulton County admits they did not follow the rules.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 6:53 pm to loogaroo
Posted on 12/22/25 at 6:53 pm to loogaroo
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. A. Secretary of State Raffensperger refuses to testify under oath about the security of his own Dominion rigging machines.
B. Instead, the Secretary of State sent a threatening letter to counties instructing them not to allow a forensic examination of the Dominion machines.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 6:55 pm to UncleFestersLegs
Man you're dumb.
I even broke it down for you
This comment
was covered here
and has no net impact on the votes cast on election day in Fulton County
I even broke it down for you
This comment
quote:
Due to the clerical error, Trump could have won GA.
was covered here
quote:
Other than the formalistic-legal options for invalidation,
and has no net impact on the votes cast on election day in Fulton County
Posted on 12/22/25 at 6:57 pm to Sofaking2
quote:
Something changed from 2020 to 2024
What changed:

Posted on 12/22/25 at 6:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
Let’s take a moment to commend the outstanding leadership of Fulton Co, GA for their timely investigation.
Standing true to their motto …
‘Fulton — minutes ahead when seconds count’
Standing true to their motto …
‘Fulton — minutes ahead when seconds count’
Posted on 12/22/25 at 9:27 pm to Stat M Repairman
Posted on 12/23/25 at 4:59 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Man you're dumb.
quote:
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Due to the clerical error, Trump could have won GA.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 5:02 am to loogaroo
Fulton County 524k votes in 2020, 537k votes in 2024.
315k votes weren't faked.
Kamala got 3k more votes than Biden
315k votes weren't faked.
Kamala got 3k more votes than Biden
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 5:04 am
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:18 am to sgallo3
This thread is a basic intelligence and reading test and many have failed.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:43 am to SlowFlowPro
What proof do you have that the measures to properly conduct the voting process were taken without the clerical steps?
This post was edited on 12/23/25 at 6:45 am
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:47 am to G2160
They have is a stack of ballots they hand recounted, but no one can verify the chain of custody.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:49 am to G2160
quote:
What proof do you have that the measures to properly conduct the voting process were taken without the clerical steps?
You know there were recounts and post-election analyses out the arse in GA, right?
If the machines were actually not at 0 at the point where they failed to get the proper signature certifying that status, the recounts for Fulton County wouldn't have lined up. After at least 3 recounts, the election was certified.
LINK
quote:
Georgia’s top elections official on Monday recertified the state’s election results after a recount requested by President Donald Trump confirmed once again that Democrat Joe Biden won the state, and the governor then recertified the state’s 16 presidential electors.
“We have now counted legally cast ballots three times, and the results remain unchanged,” Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger said during a news conference at the state Capitol before the results were recertified.
There is even a process if the numbers don't line up, which was done
quote:
During the recount, which was done using scanners that read and tally the votes, there were discrepancies in vote totals in some counties. Since the results of a recount become the official results, those counties had to recertify their results. Once that was done the secretary of state recertified the statewide results, his office said in a news release.
After three recounts, this is the impact in Fulton, specifically:
quote:
The total number of votes in the recount results certified Monday and posted on the secretary of state’s website was 766 fewer than the number certified when the ballots were first tallied after the election. Biden’s lead dropped from 12,670 to 11,779. That appears to be largely due to a discrepancy in Fulton County, the state’s most populous county that includes most of Atlanta.
So, even assuming all of these votes were due to non-zero machines (which isn't even alleged by the people pushing this story), it was 766, not 315k.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:50 am to loogaroo
Chan of custody isn't a big deal
Old news
Slowtabulationpro
Old news
Slowtabulationpro
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:50 am to loogaroo
quote:
but no one can verify the chain of custody.
Can you describe how chain of custody specifically applies, or is a particular concern, to this story about the 315k votes?
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:52 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Sans signatures, there is no chain of custody. Why do you ask?
Can you describe how chain of custody specifically applies
Posted on 12/23/25 at 6:54 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Sans signatures, there is no chain of custody.
The signatures at issue here have nothing to do with chain of custody, though.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 7:18 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:You know less of those details than you should.
You know there were recounts and post-election analyses out the arse in GA, right?
Regardless, for example, after a GA 2022 primary, initial DVS machine results showed zero Election Day votes for a candidate, Michelle Long Spears, in all but seven precincts — including in her own precinct where she knew she and her husband had voted.
An initial machine recount, as with the 2020 processes, generated an identical result --- zero votes in all but seven precincts. Eventually a "programming error" was identified. When corrected, Spears won the election. There were numerous issues with the Raffensperger recounts in 2020.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 7:19 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Other than the fact there is no documentation of chain of custody, therefore no chain of custody?
The signatures at issue here have nothing to do with chain of custody, though.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 7:21 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Can you describe how chain of custody specifically applies, or is a particular concern, to this story about the 315k votes?
Can you describe why the clerical steps were supposed to have been included as part of the certification of the count?
Posted on 12/23/25 at 7:21 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Other than the fact there is no documentation of chain of custody, therefore no chain of custody?
I'll repeat the question
quote:
Can you describe how chain of custody specifically applies, or is a particular concern, to this story about the 315k votes?
You're trying to discuss another potential issue and not the story about the 315k votes. I"m only asking about the story about the 315k votes
Posted on 12/23/25 at 7:22 am to G2160
quote:
Can you describe why the clerical steps were supposed to have been included as part of the certification of the count?
Government workers are a particular kind of idiot, is my best guess
Popular
Back to top


0






