- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fulton county election office raided by fbi
Posted on 1/29/26 at 10:28 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 1/29/26 at 10:28 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
keep applying the pressure....it drives the DEMS crazy!
The 2020 was fraudulent, period. The count may have been accurate, but the validity of the DEM vote was absolutely wrong.
The 2020 COVID election will go down in history as extremely questionable, and that's a fact.
The 2020 was fraudulent, period. The count may have been accurate, but the validity of the DEM vote was absolutely wrong.
The 2020 COVID election will go down in history as extremely questionable, and that's a fact.
0
Posted on 1/29/26 at 10:28 am to TS1926
quote:
What does a divorce court lawyer know about RICO?
I've been a part of a (state/civil, so not fully applicable) RICO case before
While not federal, I did secure a successful remand from the WDLA as well as argued several pretrial motions.
I've also been counsel for several people charged with it, at least one point in their prosecution. Again, state-level, but criminal this time.
I'm no expert, but I've dabbled.
Posted on 1/29/26 at 10:31 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
So when you check the number of votes cast in Arizona, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin between 2016 and 2020, you don't see what you would expect to see with massive fraud. For example, in Pennsylvania Biden's total votes did go up 18%...but Trump's went up 14%. The net difference is almost exactly the percentage that protest votes syphoned off in 2016. Same in Wisconsin. Biden up 18%, Trump up 15%. The difference was mostly Stein not being on the ballot and other protest votes not happening (write-ins, Libertarian Party, etc).
You can do 2024 as well. The highly contested purple states had extremely high participation in 2024 as well. The divergence in DEM support in these states and majorly DEM states explains the total/national voting loss. Had there been this massive fraud in 2020, it's highly unlikely you'd have seen these results in 2024 in the contested states (where the purported fraud occurred in 2020).
Posted on 1/29/26 at 10:33 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
I’d bet SFP has forgotten more about RICO than you’ve ever known
SFP, you, and I have been involved in the same about of Rico trials. - Zero.
But, this is what I like so see from my legal dream team. 2nd chair defending 1st chair.
Posted on 1/29/26 at 10:39 am to Rebel
RICO trials aren't that common b/c they are so complex it's not the favored method of prosecution. It's typically a last ditch effort with a legit, layered, organized crime enterprise.
Here is an article about it after the DOJ lost the RICO case against Diddy
Here is an article about it after the DOJ lost the RICO case against Diddy
quote:
“Outside of death penalty cases, the RICO statute has some of the most difficult elements to satisfy,” Mitchell Epner, a former assistant U.S. attorney in New Jersey, told NewsNation.
That’s, in part, because of the “cumbersome requirements” prosecutors must meet to get a RICO conviction, Epner added.
In Combs’ case, the jury had to find that at least two criminal acts occurred within his enterprise. Prosecutors offered the jury charges related to kidnapping, arson, bribery, witness tampering, forced labor, sex trafficking, transportation to engage in prostitution and drug distribution.
The jury ultimately found Combs not guilty of that racketeering charge after telling the judge they were deadlocked over it after one day of deliberation.
quote:
RICO has an expansive reach, but historically, U.S. attorneys’ offices have been cautious in how they read the statute to not overreach, former federal prosecutor Jeff Chemerinsky told NewsNation.
“RICO cases tend to be necessarily more complicated and more involved, longer and require a different type of evidence than any other cases,” Chemerinsky said. “You have to prove not just the crimes charged, but also that the whole enterprise existed and the defendant’s participation in it. All those take on an extra burden.”
Posted on 1/29/26 at 10:42 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
RICO trials aren't that common b/c they are so complex
My point stands.
Posted on 1/29/26 at 11:02 am to SlowFlowPro
You handle both civil and criminal cases???
Posted on 1/29/26 at 11:17 am to dafif
Yeah and family stuff. I've done all kinds of stuff over my career. I used to work for someone and didn't have a choice/say in what cases he took.
Posted on 1/29/26 at 11:26 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 1/29/26 at 11:38 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Yeah and family stuff. I've done all kinds of stuff
I would never pretend anything like that - my only "criminal l" was a ticket my son got for underage drinking - in Gainesville and for laughs - courtroom was packed
Posted on 1/29/26 at 11:40 am to dafif
I was in 2 different criminal courts just this morning 
Posted on 1/29/26 at 11:40 am to SlowFlowPro
You’re such an intellectually dishonest hack. The evidence is out there and there’s lots of it to show the fraud is rampant
Posted on 1/29/26 at 11:45 am to SlowFlowPro
Got a family court lawyer in podunk Louisiana expounding on cases he has absolutely zero experience trying in court. Dunning-Kruger in full effect.
This post was edited on 1/29/26 at 11:48 am
Posted on 1/29/26 at 11:48 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
Here's why: Trump actually didn't win the 2016 election. Clinton lost it. And what I mean by that is that those states that Trump "miraculously flipped" in 2016—Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan—he didn't really flip them. That's not what happened.
what in the heck? You think those states just magically flipped to DJT? You're trying to minimize his efforts and downplay HRC's lack of an effort.
Posted on 1/29/26 at 1:48 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Posted on 1/29/26 at 1:49 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
You think those states just magically flipped to DJT?
No, I explained why i think those states went for Trump.
I'll try again.
If you take the Green party votes and add it to Clinton's totals in 2016 in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, Trump loses in 2016. That's not a theory. That's a fact.
When The Democratic Party gets the Green Party thrown off the ticket in 2020, Trump loses the same states.
Again, fact.
You stopped reading my post at the last part you quoted, didn't you?
Posted on 1/29/26 at 2:22 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
You stopped reading my post at the last part you quoted, didn't you?
No sir, I laughed the entire time reading it actually because it's asinine.
Regardless, we're on two different planets relative to this thread so it's pointless to even discuss. Have a good day
Posted on 1/29/26 at 2:51 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
we're on two different planets relative to this thread
I'm on the one that uses math and simple arithmetic.
Which one are you on?
Posted on 1/29/26 at 2:57 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
downplay HRC's lack of an effort.
No, I'm explaining how her lack of effort (and likability, and dookie policies) ended up causing people to cast twice as many protest votes in those states as usual.
I'll try this: They didn't vote for Trump. They just didn't vote for Clinton.
You're not very smart, are you?
Page 12 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News