- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 3/13/24 at 12:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
How?
It was a federal election. certified by a state authority. A piss ant DA from some backwards county doesnt have the power to imprison the leading candidate of the opposing party in response to a federal/state election.
The states attorney should have snatched the case from her, then dismissed it, just as the this GA superior court judge has done
Posted on 3/13/24 at 12:43 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
The states attorney should have snatched the case from her, then dismissed it,
What law permits this? I'm not a GA attorney.
quote:
just as the this GA superior court judge has done
You do know the whole case wasn't dismissed and even his ruling permits the DA to re-file these charges, right?
Posted on 3/13/24 at 12:47 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You do know the whole case wasn't dismissed and even his ruling permits the DA to re-file these charges, right?
What are the ramifications of presenting an illegally retrieved recording to a grand jury?
Posted on 3/13/24 at 12:49 pm to TDTOM
Probably BamaATL or Maomcgrath
Posted on 3/13/24 at 12:49 pm to moneyg
quote:
What are the ramifications of presenting an illegally retrieved recording to a grand jury?
Cwill says this is just an angle and of no real value.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 12:50 pm to SlowFlowPro
Still holding out hope, I see
Posted on 3/13/24 at 12:52 pm to roadGator
quote:
Probably BamaATL or Maomcgrath
No, it was one of the newer ones.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 12:52 pm to TDTOM
Hmmmm. Newer commie.
WB Davis?
WB Davis?
Posted on 3/13/24 at 12:54 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Still holding out hope, I see
I'm just stating facts. No personal opinions.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 12:55 pm to moneyg
quote:
What are the ramifications of presenting an illegally retrieved recording to a grand jury?
I"m not a GA attorney so I can't weigh in.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:03 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
m not a GA attorney so I can't weigh in.
What are the ramifications in LA?
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:10 pm to masoncj
quote:
Not much left…lol out our board experts saying phone call would take him out
So if I'm reading this quote from the judge correctly this seems to be less about the phone call specifically and more about the vagueness of the thrown out charges of "soliciting an official to break his oath of office".
"These six counts contain all the essential elements of the crimes but fail to allege sufficient detail regarding the nature of their commission,” Judge McAfee wrote in his ruling. “They do not give the Defendants enough information to prepare their defenses intelligently, as the Defendants could have violated the Constitution and thus the statute in dozens, if not hundreds, of distinct ways.”
Regardless, that's 6 charges down, only 32 more to go.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:12 pm to GoblinGuide
I think that the judge is doing everything he can to not have to deal with the fruit of the poison tree arguments by the various defendants by trying to remove any counts tied to the phone call, but not saying the recording of the phone call itself was invalid.
That way the case itself remains, he doesn't have to get into the legality of the hows, wheres, and whys of the recording, he avoids a messy fight that is guaranteed to be appealed either way, and theoretically provides Willis the ability to keep an August trial calendar.
That way the case itself remains, he doesn't have to get into the legality of the hows, wheres, and whys of the recording, he avoids a messy fight that is guaranteed to be appealed either way, and theoretically provides Willis the ability to keep an August trial calendar.
This post was edited on 3/13/24 at 1:17 pm
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What law permits this? I'm not a GA attorney.
GA is the only state that doesnt allow change of venue? I was unaware of that
quote:
Nature and Gravity of the Offense. The “nature” of the offense refers to the peculiar facts or aspects of a crime that makes the case sensational or otherwise brings it to the consciousness of the community. The more sensational the portrayal of the facts of a case the more likely it is that jurors will be prejudicial by publicity. The “gravity” refers to its seriousness in the law and to the possible consequences to an accused in the event of a guilty verdict.
It was really a no-brainer
quote:
his ruling permits the DA to re-file these charges, right?
With this ruling the DA should be properly removed from this case by the other judge, and there will be no re-filing
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:21 pm to laxtonto
quote:
think that the judge is doing everything he can to not have to deal with the fruit of the poison tree arguments by the various defendants by trying to remove any counts tied to the phone call, but not saying the recording of the phone call itself was invalid.
That way the case itself remains, he doesn't have to get into the legality of the hows, wheres, and whys of the recording, he avoids a messy fight that is guaranteed to be appealed either way, and theoretically provides Willis the ability to keep an August trial calendar.
I don't envy the guy. Any ruling he gives on any matter on this case is going to be called politicized by one side or another.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:22 pm to laxtonto
If judge does not throw Willis and Wade to the curb, his career is over.
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:23 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
GA is the only state that doesnt allow change of venue? I was unaware of that
I didn't respond to you talking about changing venue. Why are you changing your argument?
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I didn't respond to you talking about changing venue. Why are you changing your argument?
You have another term for changing the case from local to state/federal authority? I mean, i could have used the term removal, if that helps you any
Posted on 3/13/24 at 1:47 pm to GoblinGuide
quote:
So if I'm reading this quote from the judge correctly this seems to be less about the phone call specifically and more about the vagueness of the thrown out charges of "soliciting an official to break his oath of office".
I think two of the six relate to the phone call, assuming that all of the solicitation charges involving Trump/SOS stem from the call. The others relate to petitioning the House/Senate on the alternate electors ruse/scheme/plan.
It knocked out 1/4 of the charges against a professional friend of mine.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News