- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Gay Couple Rape Adopted Sons
Posted on 12/23/24 at 10:00 pm to FooManChoo
Posted on 12/23/24 at 10:00 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
Yeah, that’s not how it works. Churches are to obey God and only ordain men as pastors
Yup...no minister has ever served up the holy sausage to the young boys in their congregation...no, never...it's just the gay ones, right......?
Never the teacher in Livingston parish abusing kids with her straight, cop, little boy diddling husband and feeding her third grade class cupcakes her husband jizzed on, while taping it for her beloved straight husband to enjoy later...no, it's only the gays...
You people need to read up on who, and what, commit 99% of sex crimes against children in this country and get this pissed at your neighbors, pastors, uncles and scout masters...
Newsflash.. The worst if the worst are rarely gays....
However, these 2 need to die for what they did.
4
Posted on 12/23/24 at 10:09 pm to Cleary Rebels
quote:
They’ll be killed in prison.
I hope it's quite slow and very very very painful.
Posted on 12/23/24 at 10:19 pm to John Barron
Absolutely vile and I hope they get obliterated in prison. But I wonder why we never hear about the straight couples raping their children around here.
LINK
LINK
Posted on 12/23/24 at 10:27 pm to Dex Morgan
quote:
But
Found a gay groomer
Posted on 12/23/24 at 10:37 pm to John Barron
quote:give an inch take a mile
Congrats f@gs, you not standing up against your own community means you’re all condemned. Groomers the entire lot of you. fricking disgusting that they just turn a blind eye to this and don’t reprimand it. There’s evil straight trailer trash white men that have done this but the difference is that we would all kill them ourselves given the chance. IRL f@gs defend these actions by ignoring them
Posted on 12/23/24 at 10:40 pm to TheHumanTornado
Providing cover for rapist. You people are disgusting
Posted on 12/23/24 at 11:25 pm to John Barron
I found the hypocrite...
Posted on 12/23/24 at 11:27 pm to Jeffersonian
quote:This was common knowledge when I was growing up.
All fàgs are groomers
Posted on 12/23/24 at 11:34 pm to Dex Morgan
quote:
Dex Morgan
Fight, Fight, Fight...for the figs
Posted on 12/23/24 at 11:34 pm to Tigahs24Seven
quote:
Yup...no minister has ever served up the holy sausage to the young boys in their congregation...no, never...it's just the gay ones, right......?
Never the teacher in Livingston parish abusing kids with her straight, cop, little boy diddling husband and feeding her third grade class cupcakes her husband jizzed on, while taping it for her beloved straight husband to enjoy later...no, it's only the gays...
You people need to read up on who, and what, commit 99% of sex crimes against children in this country and get this pissed at your neighbors, pastors, uncles and scout masters...
Newsflash.. The worst if the worst are rarely gays....
However, these 2 need to die for what they did.
To be clear while I agree with your premise here strongly I want all these grooming monsters especially those given positions of power over children punished by the harshest punishments we got.
It's what makes the Catholic church so disgusting. They simply shuffle pedophiles around the globe to prevent legal trouble...
Posted on 12/23/24 at 11:43 pm to Tigahs24Seven
quote:Heterosexuals can and do commit sexual immorality, whether that be fornication, adultery, rape, incest, and even child abuse. I'm not denying that sin exists in every person. I'm just defending the biblical view of elders, including teaching elders (pastors). Women are not to hold such spiritual authority and office and that isn't an option just because there are heterosexual men who abuse their office.
Yup...no minister has ever served up the holy sausage to the young boys in their congregation...no, never...it's just the gay ones, right......?
Never the teacher in Livingston parish abusing kids with her straight, cop, little boy diddling husband and feeding her third grade class cupcakes her husband jizzed on, while taping it for her beloved straight husband to enjoy later...no, it's only the gays...
You people need to read up on who, and what, commit 99% of sex crimes against children in this country and get this pissed at your neighbors, pastors, uncles and scout masters...
Newsflash.. The worst if the worst are rarely gays....
However, these 2 need to die for what they did.
You can't get away from the sinfulness of homosexuality, though. There is no such thing as a "loving homosexual relationship" in God's eyes, because to cause another person to sin (by being involved sexually with another man or woman) is wicked and not loving at all. It's not OK to endorse homosexual relationships at all while it is OK to endorse and engage in moral/lawful (according to God's law) heterosexual relationships.
Not all homosexuals abuse children, but there is no homosexual sexual relationship that is moral and good according to God's law. All heterosexual relationships that are immoral and sinful should be condemned just as much as homosexual relationships and abuse. Homosexuals, though, are said by God's word to be given over to their sin in a unique way. What they do is not just a violation of God's moral law, but of nature, itself.
Posted on 12/23/24 at 11:45 pm to RohanGonzales
Is that what you would call men like Ric Grenell, Peter Thiel, and the man that secured the Amish vote for Trump?
Posted on 12/23/24 at 11:49 pm to td01241
These men deserve the sentence they got. What they did is a betrayal of the trust they asked their children to place in them. It’s important to remember these men are exception within the world of gay adoption. It’s also important to remember this sadly happens in a corresponding number of straight marriages.
Obergfell is decided in part via Loving. If they overturn Obergfell, they have to overturn Loving.
That’s not happening.
Oh yay. Another gay thread hijacked by judgmental Pharisees.
So… the Talmudic law condemned homosexuality. That law was determined to be impossible to fulfill, hence, God sent his only son to die and be resurrected to fulfill it.
Jesus himself, in the Gospels that have been passed down to us, never expressly condemned homosexuality. He had a lot more to say about adultery than he did about homosexuality. Also, homosexuality never existed as a societally-accepted monogamous alternative during that time. Who are you to determine that Christ would condemn such relationships? Especially in light of how many Bible-believing Christians treat divorce as an acceptable practice to end a marriage for a myriad of reasons despite specific instructions from Jesus himself as to when divorce is acceptable? (Hint: there’s only one reason.) Perhaps churches and straight folks should take the planks out of their own eyes by not divorcing at a +50% clip before pointing out the sins of others.
The condemnations against homosexuality in the New Testament comes solely from Paul, not the Son of God. Why do you put more stock in the re-Judiazation of Christianity as presented by Paul when the Savior you profess to follow has never been recorded as saying one word against it?
By the way, both Jesus and Paul state that believers should choose not to get married as it is better not to be. Why then should any Christian get married?
I’ll hang up and listen.
I really want Chicken to get us a fricking religion board so folks can take this stuff over there.
quote:
obergefell is just as horrible a legal opinion as Roe was
Obergfell is decided in part via Loving. If they overturn Obergfell, they have to overturn Loving.
That’s not happening.
quote:
Homosexuals, though, are said by God's word to be given over to their sin in a unique way. What they do is not just a violation of God's moral law, but of nature, itself.
Oh yay. Another gay thread hijacked by judgmental Pharisees.
So… the Talmudic law condemned homosexuality. That law was determined to be impossible to fulfill, hence, God sent his only son to die and be resurrected to fulfill it.
Jesus himself, in the Gospels that have been passed down to us, never expressly condemned homosexuality. He had a lot more to say about adultery than he did about homosexuality. Also, homosexuality never existed as a societally-accepted monogamous alternative during that time. Who are you to determine that Christ would condemn such relationships? Especially in light of how many Bible-believing Christians treat divorce as an acceptable practice to end a marriage for a myriad of reasons despite specific instructions from Jesus himself as to when divorce is acceptable? (Hint: there’s only one reason.) Perhaps churches and straight folks should take the planks out of their own eyes by not divorcing at a +50% clip before pointing out the sins of others.
The condemnations against homosexuality in the New Testament comes solely from Paul, not the Son of God. Why do you put more stock in the re-Judiazation of Christianity as presented by Paul when the Savior you profess to follow has never been recorded as saying one word against it?
By the way, both Jesus and Paul state that believers should choose not to get married as it is better not to be. Why then should any Christian get married?
I’ll hang up and listen.
I really want Chicken to get us a fricking religion board so folks can take this stuff over there.
This post was edited on 12/24/24 at 12:11 am
Posted on 12/23/24 at 11:49 pm to Dex Morgan
Heard Rod Blagojevich on Rogan today claiming pedos are a protected class in our prisons. Made me so pissed.
Posted on 12/23/24 at 11:56 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
All heterosexual relationships that are immoral and sinful should be condemned just as much as homosexual relationships and abuse.
Like cooking shrimp and pork for others.
Or slaves not obeying their masters
Or not cutting off enough of the baby's penis skin when born
Posted on 12/24/24 at 12:26 am to oklahogjr
quote:
Like cooking shrimp and pork for others.
Or slaves not obeying their masters
Or not cutting off enough of the baby's penis skin when born
Spoken like someone unaquanited with the difference between the moral law and the ceremonial law.
All sexual sins are related to the 7th commandment.
This post was edited on 12/24/24 at 12:27 am
Posted on 12/24/24 at 1:06 am to bluestem75
quote:
Oh yay. Another gay thread hijacked by judgmental Pharisees.
Pharisees were hypocrites that cared about apparences while not honoring God with their hearts. Not everyone who teaches the truth of God's word is a "Pharisee". Perhaps you wouldn't appreciate being called an anti-nomian for your quickness to condemn "judgement" that is in accord with biblical categories?
quote:Recall that Jesus said He didn't come to abolish the law but to fulfill it. That means that whatever He did, He didn't come to make it go away completely. The 10 commandments still abide. The law, however, no longer points forward to the coming of a Messiah that would fulfill its demands, but now shows us how we are to be holy as God is holy, and to obey out of love and thankfulness for what Jesus has done for us. Jesus, Himself, commands His followers to be perfect as His Father in Heaven is perfect (Matt. 5:48), and that if we love Him, we will obey His commands (John 14:15).
So… the Talmudic law condemned homosexuality. That law was determined to be impossible to fulfill, hence, God sent his only son to die and be resurrected to fulfill it.
So don't take what Christ did on the cross to mean that Christians can do as they please because they are not under law but grace (Rom. 6)
quote:There are countless sins that Jesus didn't address directly or even indirectly. That is irrelevant if God's word speaks to it, though. The words of Paul are equal to the words of Jesus in terms of authority because both are God's divine revelation and ultimately come from Him.
Jesus himself, in the Gospels that have been passed down to us, never expressly condemned homosexuality. He had a lot more to say about adultery than he did about homosexuality.
With that said, Jesus did speak to homosexuality indirectly. He spoke to lust and marriage. He said if a man looks at a woman with lust in his heart, he has committed adultery (Matt. 5:27-28). Do you think that doesn't apply to homosexuals? Secondly, Jesus affirmed that creation ordinance of marriage by affirming that marriage is between one man and one woman (Matt. 19:4-6). If sex--and even lust--outside of marriage is sinful and marriage is between one man and one woman, then by good and necessary consequence, Jesus was condemning homosexuality as being sinful.
quote:I'm no one of consequence, but the Scriptures do not allow for homosexual relationships to be acceptable. The biblical evidence does not provide any positive examples of homosexuality, but only negative ones, in both the Old Testament and the New Testament. On the contrary, and as I already just stated, Jesus' teaching on lust and marriage militates against homosexual relationships.
Also, homosexuality never existed as a societally-accepted monogamous alternative during that time. Who are you to determine that Christ would condemn such relationships?
quote:You won't find any disagreement about this statement from me about the acceptance of unlawful divorce by so many Christians today. I will say that desertion is also given as a reason for divorce in the Scriptures, though, so it is allowable for the victim to divorce and get remarried if their spouse leaves them (1 Cor. 7:10-16)
Especially in light of how many Bible-believing Christians treat divorce as an acceptable practice to end a marriage for a myriad of reasons despite specific instructions from Jesus himself as to when divorce is acceptable? (Hint: there’s only one reason.) Perhaps churches and straight folks should take the planks out of their own eyes by not divorcing at a +50% clip before pointing out the sins of others.
Even so, an erroneous view of divorce does not justify an erroneous view of homosexuality.
quote:First of all, Jesus affirmed marriage between a man and a woman.
The condemnations against homosexuality in the New Testament comes solely from Paul, not the Son of God. Why do you put more stock in the re-Judiazation of Christianity as presented by Paul when the Savior you profess to follow has never been recorded as saying one word against it?
Secondly, all of the Scriptures are God-breathed (2 Tim. 3:16-17), and therefore there is no red-letter Christianity. Jesus' words are no more authoritative than Paul's for the simple fact that Paul's writings were inspired by God, and therefore the entirety of the Bible is the word of God, including Matthew's quotations of Jesus as well as Paul's writings. When you stick to Jesus' words, you are actually saying that Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John are to be believed, because you are assuming their quotations of Jesus are accurate and authoritative while you reject Paul's words. You do not have an orthodox view of the Scriptures if that is the case.
quote:While Paul said it is better to not be burdened by the obligations of marriage and family, he didn't condemn marriage and family, but instead said that it is better to marry than burn with lust (1 Cor. 7:9). He wasn't saying that marriage was bad, but that it was better to have the gift of celibacy, which he understood not many actually had. It's why Paul wrote to husbands and wives and how they are to act towards one another, and how parents and children are to relate to one another (Eph. 5-6; Col. 3)
By the way, both Jesus and Paul state that believers should choose not to get married as it is better not to be. Why then should any Christian get married?
I’ll hang up and listen.
Likewise, Jesus affirmed marriage as a creation ordinance, and He did not condemn it at all. You seem to be misconstruing what they both said and taught in order to defend homosexuality. Considering there wasn't a time throughout the length of Christianity and going back into Old Testament Judaism where homosexuality was tolerated except in the past few decades, I think you're on shaky ground and don't have the text or history on your side, if that's what you're attempting to do.
quote:I would like that, but until then, politics and current events almost always touches on morality, and morality necessarily touches on religion.
I really want Chicken to get us a fricking religion board so folks can take this stuff over there.
Posted on 12/24/24 at 7:26 am to Tigahs24Seven
here's how it works jethro when you put the penis in your mouth and swish around a little bit you're gay, you may have a wife, you might even have kids but you're still gay and maybe even consider yourself bisexual but you are in fact gay. these boys were adopted into this gay couples home by a "christian" adoption agency called all god's children that specializes placing special needs children into homes. so developmental disabled children 10 and 12 placed into a home with these two monsters. they are an international adoption agency specializing in children from africa, india, latin america and eastern europe get the picture jethro they're child traffickers masquerading as christian adoption agency.
Posted on 12/24/24 at 7:33 am to John Barron
I heard there's this one county they take mentally deranged people like this and toss them off top of high building
Posted on 12/24/24 at 7:34 am to John Barron
“It’s just two kids here. Boys, at that. I’d this really a thing?”
The View
The View
Page 4 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News