- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ghislaine Maxwell says she is willing to reveal Jeffrey Epstein's client list
Posted on 7/14/25 at 5:57 pm to Toomer Deplorable
Posted on 7/14/25 at 5:57 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
What on EARTH has led you to THIS conclusion?
There is NOTHING suspicious WHATSOEVER about a registered sex offender, convicted child rapist and suspected sex trafficker maintaining a relationship with the head of the CIA and a top New York investment house.
Only a tin-foil nutter would find ANYTHING out of the ordinary about this.
I’m pretty sure not a soul has even insinuated what you just described. You wouldn’t be exaggerating and overstating, would you? Because, see, that kind of thing is precisely what I believe is mostly stoking this fire out of control.
This post was edited on 7/14/25 at 5:58 pm
1
Posted on 7/14/25 at 5:59 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Is she tired of living?
Posted on 7/14/25 at 6:03 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Well there is a first. Someone signing their own death certificate.
Posted on 7/14/25 at 6:10 pm to davyjones
quote:
I’m pretty sure not a soul has even insinuated what you just described. You wouldn’t be exaggerating and overstating, would you?
It certainly seems a pretty big deal to me that a convicted child rapist and suspected child sex trafficker was meeting with the head of the CIA. Does it to you?
That fact alone seems worthy of discussion and likewise should warrant further investigation if not a special counsel. Yet Trump has indicated the Esptein affair is no big deal and it is no longer worth discussing while Pam Bondi has indicated that the investigation is essentially being wrapped up.
This post was edited on 7/14/25 at 7:39 pm
Posted on 7/14/25 at 6:11 pm to Toomer Deplorable
He also met with the leader of the America First Party
Thats also suspect
Thats also suspect
Posted on 7/14/25 at 6:15 pm to Toomer Deplorable
Again, nobody says what you described is “not a big deal.” The central point of the actual debate is whether the Trump administration is actively and intentionally “covering up” a vast worldwide pedophilia ring. And unfortunately many of the naysayers have been convinced that there’s actually a simple, straightforward “list” of names that this administration is, again, actively and intentionally covering up. Not whether a pedophilia ring, or pedophilia of any description, is a “big deal.”
Posted on 7/14/25 at 6:19 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Posted on 7/14/25 at 6:22 pm to davyjones
Dude this goes way deeper than some kind of escort service for pedo’s.
Posted on 7/14/25 at 6:26 pm to Champagne
quote:
She has just signed her own Death Warrant.
So you think she is going to tell you the truth?
Posted on 7/14/25 at 6:34 pm to davyjones
quote:
Again, nobody says what you described is “not a big deal.” The central point of the actual debate is whether the Trump administration is actively and intentionally “covering up” a vast worldwide pedophilia ring.
Epstein wasn’t running a vast pedophile ring. When he died in custody, Epstein was facing charges of sex trafficking teenage girls.
Posted on 7/14/25 at 6:34 pm to RollingwiththeTide
I’m not sure why you think that I’m making that assertion in the first place. I’m certainly not. If it came across as such, please consider this my clarification of the matter. I don’t think that “modest” description fits the bill at all.
Posted on 7/14/25 at 6:36 pm to Toomer Deplorable
Dude, give me a f’in break. We’re referring to the same thing and you know that. People have and are referring to the matter in a million different ways. I’m pretty sure most halfway sane folks understand the central issue.
Posted on 7/14/25 at 6:37 pm to davyjones
Epstein had to work for a government or government’s. No way that guy beats the system as long as he did without that type of cover.
Posted on 7/14/25 at 6:38 pm to Gator5220
quote:
What's the odds they both die by suicide?
Maxwell should have spilled the beans when she was under oath in her trial. Now she wants to come clean and that may be a health hazard.
Posted on 7/14/25 at 6:43 pm to RollingwiththeTide
quote:
Epstein had to work for a government or government’s. No way that guy beats the system as long as he did without that type of cover.
Oh I don’t doubt that assertion either. But that doesn’t equate to Trump now covering up a “list” or covering up some other straightforward document or documents that lay out in simple terms exactly who and how Epstein may have possibly had some assistance or influence designed to cover the tracks.
I personally think an expectation of anything that direct, straightforward, simply stated, and most significantly available to have been gathered in the form of viewable evidence was or is reasonable to expect in the first place, but that’s a different subtopic I guess.
This post was edited on 7/14/25 at 6:44 pm
Posted on 7/14/25 at 6:48 pm to davyjones
Well if you have CIA Spooks or some other intel agency involved then the reason Trump can’t release any kind of list. You could be burning an assets cover by releasing it. When I say asset I’m saying someone that works in a particular area they want info on. They use their weaknesses for the kids to turn them into spies working for them. That’s kind of stuff is why you will never see a list.
Posted on 7/14/25 at 6:49 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
Epstein wasn’t running a vast pedophile ring. When he died in custody, Epstein was facing charges of sex trafficking teenage girls.
You are assuming they were all adults, but you don’t know that 100%. Pam Bondi admitted there were many hours of child porn/video tapes Epstein had in his possession. Are you sure a few of those tapes didn’t involve children who were trafficked? I would not put it past Epstein. He was likely an Israeli asset so I put nothin past the Mossad in compromising people. It wouldn’t shock me if some of those girls were 15, 16, or 17.
This post was edited on 7/14/25 at 6:50 pm
Posted on 7/14/25 at 7:46 pm to davyjones
quote:
Dude, give me a f’in break. We’re referring to the same thing and you know that. People have and are referring to the matter in a million different ways. I’m pretty sure most halfway sane folks understand the central issue.
Yes and the central issue here is indeed that Epstein was facing Federal charges for trafficking teenage — though not prepubescent children. Sickening as it, some were alleged to be as young as 14.
Yet it is important to make the distinction so as to establish that this is not some outlandish conspiracy theory about a nebulous “world-wide pedophilia ring” but the very particular crimes that Epstein was facing. Who was helping Epstein procure these victims?
More importantly, what happened to the evidence obtained by the FBI in the raid of Epstein’s townhouse? A special counsel is in order alone on how this evidence went missing.
'Missing' Jeffrey Epstein Tapes Puts Pressure on FBI…
…
In 2019, FBI agents testified during Maxwell's trial that following a raid on Epstein's townhouse in New York City, some evidence "went missing."
FBI Special Agent Kelly Maguire testified in 2019 that during the raid of Epstein's residence, FBI agents found a safe with CDs, computer hard drives, money, jewelry and passports. During her testimony, Maguire said that FBI agents did not have a valid warrant to remove the evidence, so instead, they photographed them.
A few days later, when they returned to obtain the evidence, it was gone, The Telegraph reported.
…
nypost.com
Posted on 7/14/25 at 7:46 pm to Sofaking2
quote:
You are assuming they were all adults, but you don’t know that 100%.
No. I assume nothing of the sort. Epstein was facing Federal charges of trafficking minor — yet not prepubescent — children.
From at least 2002 through at least 2005, JEFFREY EPSTEIN enticed and recruited, and caused to be enticed and recruited, dozens of minor girls to visit his mansion in New York, New York (the “New York Residence”), and his estate in Palm Beach, Florida (the “Palm Beach Residence”), to engage in sex acts with him, after which he would give the victims hundreds of dollars in cash. In order to maintain and increase his supply of victims, EPSTEIN also paid certain victims to recruit additional underage girls whom he could similarly abuse. In this way, EPSTEIN created a vast network of underage victims for him to sexually exploit, often on a daily basis, in locations including New York and Palm Beach.
EPSTEIN’s victims were as young as 14 at the time he abused them, and were, for various reasons, often particularly vulnerable to exploitation. Moreover, EPSTEIN knew that many of his victims were under 18, including because, in some instances, victims expressly told him they were underage.
In creating and maintaining this network of minor victims in multiple states to abuse and exploit sexually, EPSTEIN worked with others, including employees and associates who facilitated his conduct by, among other things, contacting victims and scheduling their sexual encounters with EPSTEIN at the New York Residence and at the Palm Beach Residence.
justice.gov
This post was edited on 7/14/25 at 7:47 pm
Posted on 7/14/25 at 7:51 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News