Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Have any of you Baws had the Antibody Test? | Page 4 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Have any of you Baws had the Antibody Test?

Posted on 4/27/20 at 5:31 pm to
Posted by Catchfalaya
Member since Feb 2018
2059 posts
Posted on 4/27/20 at 5:31 pm to
I had it. Tested positive. If you didn’t lose your taste/smell for 14 days you didn’t have it.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
164363 posts
Posted on 4/27/20 at 6:03 pm to
the big day should be on Wednesday. I will look for your thread, page me.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14941 posts
Posted on 4/27/20 at 7:33 pm to
quote:

I’m just trying to be a good citizen and make sure I know what I’m walking around with, not win some medical statistics contest.
Just ask your doctor the day before who the manufacturer of the test is. Then do a google search for the name of the test and its specificity (false positives) percentage or rate.

If it isn't 99% you're wasting your time. And even at 99% it will still have about 16% false positives. Meaning it will say you have anybodies but your don't.

I have a 90+ year old mother who lives 50 miles from from me and I haven't seen her in person in 2 months (lots of Zoom time though).

My point is, I've looked into this stuff a lot -- for my own personal use. I'm waiting until the big companies come out with tests with specificity of 100%. Roche, the 2nd largest pharma in the world, is supposed to be close to coming out with such a test. (I don't own Roche stock).

The FDA does not approve these tests yet, so, until they do, the companies are running their own accuracy tests on own their own products. That's a joke.

Your doctor, even if he is a good doctor, is likely to read the accuracy information off the package -- that no one but the company itself has verified.

If you take the same test that they gave in the Miami test -- it had an 88% specificity rate -- which means that approximately 70% (SEVENTY) of the positives shown by that test were false positives.

If that scares you, good. It scared the hell out of me, too.

Posted by MexicanTiger97
Member since May 2018
998 posts
Posted on 4/27/20 at 8:03 pm to
quote:

I can’t take my own temperature but i felt like I had a fever.


Not trying to be mean here, but why in the world can’t you take your own temperature?


His buttplug may be in the way.
Posted by LakeCharles
USA
Member since Oct 2016
5387 posts
Posted on 4/28/20 at 1:58 am to
quote:

The estimate now is that 20% of all Americans have had the cv19.



Whos arse did you pull that number out of? It may be true of parts of NYC, but no normal area of the Country is anywhere near that.

Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
17173 posts
Posted on 4/28/20 at 10:43 am to
Ok.

So My test is NEXT Tuesday

BRGMC uses Mayo’s Test.

98.6 percent specificity for those of you who are fighting about the test statistics.

But I guess it’s another week until whether I find out whether I maybe had it. And another wk for Texridder to quibble about how much of a maybe I had it or didn’t, while she / he complains about how Muh Drumpf is Hitler because testing and he’s not ordering the Mayo Clinic be 100 percent perfect and concrete and nobody should want to know to a greater degree of maybe about what is in our own body bc only the government can tell us how to calculate our own risks not our doctors unless it’s abortions bc we all know those are life sustaining and necessary medical procedures and the only one we can rely on our physicians and good sense to voluntarily have unimpeded by Orange Hitler.
This post was edited on 4/28/20 at 10:45 am
Posted by Ex-Popcorn
Member since Nov 2005
2367 posts
Posted on 4/28/20 at 11:05 am to
quote:

If you didn’t lose your taste/smell for 14 days you didn’t have it.


False. There is a gastrointestinal strain of the virus.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14941 posts
Posted on 4/28/20 at 11:15 am to
quote:

BRGMC uses Mayo’s Test.

What is the sensitivity of the test? I can't find it anywhere on Mayo's website?
Posted by LakeCharles
USA
Member since Oct 2016
5387 posts
Posted on 4/28/20 at 11:50 am to
quote:

What is the sensitivity of the test? I can't find it anywhere on Mayo's website?


Why do you care? You have already demonstrated that you don't understand the numbers and that you don't do math. Leave the nice lady alone.

Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
17173 posts
Posted on 4/28/20 at 1:48 pm to
It’s 98.6 % specific per the info the BR General Medical Center publishes about the test.

I don’t know or care if that’s the same as sensitivity, or up to the Texridder standard of proof for my medical issues, but I do trust the Mayo Clinic and my doctor to explain the difference.
Posted by IslandBuckeye
Boca Chica, Panama
Member since Apr 2018
10067 posts
Posted on 4/28/20 at 1:55 pm to
It will give true negative result 98.6% of time. It will only give false negative 1.4% of time.

I would trust the result.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14941 posts
Posted on 4/28/20 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

It’s 98.6 % specific per the info the BR General Medical Center publishes about the test.

You also need the sensitivity percentage/rate to find out the percentage/rate of false positives.
Posted by Tiger in Texas
Houston, Texas
Member since Sep 2004
22140 posts
Posted on 4/28/20 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

Anyway - who else is getting the test? And if so- why are you doing it?




I refuse to test, even if I strongly suspected I had the virus. I will not give big brother the chance to try and count me or track me! F them!
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 4/28/20 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

And another wk for Texridder to quibble about how much of a maybe I had it or didn’t
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14941 posts
Posted on 4/28/20 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

It will give true negative result 98.6% of time. It will only give false negative 1.4% of time.

You're a stupid jackass.

You have no idea what you're doing. If all you have to do is spout out the 1.4% figure in every case, why does the prevalence number matter?

Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
129065 posts
Posted on 4/28/20 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

. If you didn’t lose your taste/smell for 14 days you didn’t have it.


100% false
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14941 posts
Posted on 4/28/20 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

It will give true negative result 98.6% of time. It will only give false negative 1.4% of time.

She's not concerned about a false negative, fool.

She's concerned about s false positive.

You are clueless.
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14941 posts
Posted on 4/28/20 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

Why do you care? You have already demonstrated that you don't understand the numbers and that you don't do math

Where did you come from butthead? Have you posted in his thread or did you just decide to put in your 2 cents today?

Tell me exactly how I demonstrated that I don't understand the numbers?

Posted by IslandBuckeye
Boca Chica, Panama
Member since Apr 2018
10067 posts
Posted on 4/28/20 at 3:49 pm to
You got me on this one.

Sensitivity will give true positives and false positives.

Specificity gives true negatives and false negatives.

Apologies to you and Wednesday.
This post was edited on 4/28/20 at 3:52 pm
Posted by Sput
Member since Mar 2020
9155 posts
Posted on 4/28/20 at 3:52 pm to
Just had the prick now waiting on results in Monroe
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram