Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us ICE Agent reportedly suffered internal bleeding from being hit by SUV | Page 8 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: ICE Agent reportedly suffered internal bleeding from being hit by SUV

Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:18 pm to
Posted by jammajin
Member since Jul 2024
648 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:18 pm to
"he first shot may have been warranted, but apparently didn't kill her as he fired two more shots from the side. Clearly he could have let her go, and both would be alive today."


can you supply us with the link to the law enforcement training manual that sets forth this position? Any one will do.

In lieu of feel free to share your personal experience with attempting to be run over (by a car accelerating from approx 3 feet away from you), firing once and then "evaluating" whether additional shots are required

thanks in advance
Posted by mwade91383
Washington DC
Member since Mar 2010
7725 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:18 pm to
Nah they’re still gonna run with he wasn’t hit. No narrative change.

But you running with the “internal bleeding” narrative based on “trust me bro” that conveniently surfaced 7 days later, is new.

The North Korean Dear Leader shite around here just keeps getting worse and worse.

This post was edited on 1/14/26 at 12:19 pm
Posted by SFVtiger
Member since Oct 2003
4455 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

He shot three times, twice from the side. The first shot may have been warranted, but apparently didn't kill her as he fired two more shots from the side. Clearly he could have let her go, and both would be alive today.


This is a reasonable take and honestly, that was my first impression after seeing the videos. I'm still not sure where i come down on the issue. the reasonableness of the officer's actions have both a subjective and objective component and i can see a jury going either way. and i fully support the administration's efforts. I want 100% deportations of illegals.

Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
25701 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:21 pm to
His body cam had a pretty loud and solid hit sound on it along with a grunt.

Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
AggieHank Alter
Member since Oct 2025
2968 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

quote:

He shot three times, twice from the side. The first shot may have been warranted, but apparently didn't kill her as he fired two more shots from the side. Clearly he could have let her go, and both would be alive today.
This is a reasonable take and honestly, that was my first impression after seeing the videos. I'm still not sure where i come down on the issue. the reasonableness of the officer's actions have both a subjective and objective component and i can see a jury going either way.
Your reasonable and objective analysis makes you a Screaming Liberal by TDPT standards.

Congratulations.
This post was edited on 1/14/26 at 12:29 pm
Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
AggieHank Alter
Member since Oct 2025
2968 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:23 pm to
It is like a club. We even have jackets.

This post was edited on 1/14/26 at 12:26 pm
Posted by Patato Salad
New Orleans
Member since Mar 2009
1085 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:25 pm to
"...according to two U.S. officials..."
Posted by SFVtiger
Member since Oct 2003
4455 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

our reasonable and objective analysis makes you a Screaming Liberal by TDPT standards.


no, just a legal observer
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
58337 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

It’s about when the shots were fired, and if the response was reasonable to stop the threat


That isn’t the standard.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
58337 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

There was no imminent danger of great bodily harm when he killed her


The standard is whether or not the officer reasonably believed there was a threat to him or others. This officer will not be indicted. Despite the fact you want him jailed because OMB
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
58337 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

No, it is his evaluation of the evidence available to date. Your evaluation is different. That is why we have juries.


Haha. You still don’t understand the standard. Amazing.
Posted by statman34
Member since Feb 2011
3704 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

She was trying to drive away, not kill ICE officers. That’s dumb as hell.


She may have been trying to drive away but in the process she hit the officer and could have been interpreted as trying to run him over. By choosing that path, she gave herself the option of suicide by cop. Yes he pulled the trigger but she made that an option by her actions. And despite the narrative that this poor woman was on the way home after dropping off her kid, she was there to agitate and obstruct. What she did prior to her actions here is irrelevant or she would have made it home that day.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
58337 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

I don't think the civil servant should have killed that citizen. The bar for the government killing citizens in the street should be FAR higher. Remember, this is the same government that can't run a post office. Do we really want them making these kinds of life and death decisions?


Says the guy that votes for more government .
Posted by novabill
Crossville, TN
Member since Sep 2005
10762 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:38 pm to
Been wondering, if the same set of circumstances occurred and the shooter was a civilian, would the civilian be arrested?
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
58337 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

Ross certainly didn’t,


4000 pounds of force clipping you will leave a bruise. Dummy.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
58337 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

Your reasonable and objective analysis makes you a Screaming Liberal by TDPT standards.


Stop being a victim. You beg for the attention.
Posted by shaqtaw
Member since Oct 2009
6808 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:45 pm to
I believe he has internal bleeding a lot more than George Floyd couldn’t breathe.
Posted by mwade91383
Washington DC
Member since Mar 2010
7725 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:45 pm to
Depends. Could, but didn’t.

You keep pretending the fact that this ‘trust me bro’ story coming out of nowhere a week later totally checks out. Which is totally on brand, you continue to believe anything.
Posted by SludgeFactory
Middle of Nowhere
Member since Jun 2025
3063 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

Been wondering, if the same set of circumstances occurred and the shooter was a civilian, would the civilian be arrested?


If a progressive loon was trying to run over a Trump supporter in MN, and the Trump supporter killed the screeching prog, the Trump supporter would go to jail for life.

If the Trump supporter allowed themselves to be killed, which is what every leftist feels as though they should do, then the leftist would get off because somehow the murder would be justified.

Just all depends now on your political affiliation, demographic, and what city it happens in, honestly.
Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
AggieHank Alter
Member since Oct 2025
2968 posts
Posted on 1/14/26 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

You still don’t understand the standard.
I understand it fine. I have even posted the relevant Minnesota statute.

What I do not understand is your obsession with misrepresenting my prior posts.

I am ashamed to admit that a month or so ago I defended you to another poster and assured him that you are not a troll. Apparently, I was wrong on that point. You were once a serious person, but you have become nothing more than a troll.
This post was edited on 1/14/26 at 12:56 pm
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram