- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/22/19 at 3:20 pm to Tani
quote:
Tani
Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts: 9
Registered on: 10/22/2019
I swear, some of you assholes have ceased a pretense of even trying.
The only real question is which one are you?
Gonna have to see a few more posts.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 3:23 pm to 9th life
quote:
I guess I get the frustration with investigations, benghazi sure as heck drug on for a while, but ultimately it was necessary if not for any reason but to remove the specter or wrongdoing.
No. The Democrats aren't trying to impeach Trump because they have evidence that he committed a crime. They are trying to find a crime for which to impeach him for. So far, they have swung and missed on a number of pitches. They are not trying to uphold the law because they are virtuous and want to protect The Constitution, but rather they simply want to impeach the President. By whatever means necessary.
There, are you less confused, now?
Posted on 10/22/19 at 3:25 pm to 9th life
quote:
Perhaps, and I know you think this is crazy talk, but perhaps this latest spate of investigations will fall flat just as the Mueller report did, and lead to no articles of impeachment. then Democrats will have their chickens come home to roost.
Fair enough.
That said, what is a fair time and amount of taxpayer money to be spent on this "investigation" after a couple years and ten of millions of taxpayer dollars already spent? At what point is enough, enough?
Posted on 10/22/19 at 3:27 pm to Godfather1
quote:
The only real question is which one are you?
He is aggiehank, we established this in the thread where hank is defending child sexual abuse. Hank created him because no one upvoted him in that thread and like 50+ posters owned his arse for 30 pages. Tani appeared and now hank has 2 or 3 upvotes to his posts.
Things got quiet once this was pointed out.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 3:29 pm to memphis tiger
Violations of 52 USC 30121 and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act for beginners.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 3:29 pm to Jax-Tiger
quote:
heal the divide
Heal the divide? HA! The dividers are HEELS.

Posted on 10/22/19 at 3:31 pm to Dale51
quote:
a couple years and ten of millions of taxpayer dollars already spent? At what point is enough, enough?
Posted on 10/22/19 at 3:31 pm to CamdenTiger
quote:
but the most any of us can do is contribute $
I cant even do that bc I would be doxed and rocks thrown through our large glass windows that would cost $20k to have replaced. My very own Krystalnacht.

This post was edited on 10/22/19 at 3:37 pm
Posted on 10/22/19 at 3:36 pm to poli_tiger
quote:
Violations of 52 USC 30121 and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act for beginners.
What exactly is the evidence of those at this stage? Evidence enough, mind you, to have invoked impeachment proceedings?
Or is it just an assumption and the worker bees are furiously trying to find something to fit those allegations?
Posted on 10/22/19 at 3:37 pm to Tani
quote:
Nobody is saying that he needs to be removed to heal a divide. He needs to be removed because he is a criminal who is severely damaging the United States of America.
Can somebody tell me the fricking difference?
And while you're at it, tell me how he is "damaging" America. I won't bother telling you all of his accomplishments. Because you can probably find those in 3 or 4 other threads on the first page.
quote:
Let me guess...you think our Founding Fathers were conservative, don’t you? ??
Welp, our Founding Fathers believed in freedom of speech, limited government, the right to bear arms, and they believed in God our Creator, so I'm gonna go out on a limb and say they were conservative. Yes. Final answer.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 3:38 pm to Jax-Tiger
Stop wasting time arguing with the alter
Posted on 10/22/19 at 3:38 pm to poli_tiger
quote:
Violations of 52 USC 30121 and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act for beginners.
And another alter
Posted on 10/22/19 at 3:53 pm to poli_tiger
quote:
Violations of 52 USC 30121 and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act for beginners.
How does that violate this, passed in 1998 by Bill Clinton? It is specific to Ukraine:
Treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters
This post was edited on 10/22/19 at 4:02 pm
Posted on 10/22/19 at 3:56 pm to Dale51
Abuse of power, extortion, conspiracy, obstruction of justice, violation of the Emoluments Clause...that’s a pretty good start, don’t you think?
Posted on 10/22/19 at 3:56 pm to 9th life
quote:
Lets not pretend to be fiscally conservative now. if one thing the age of trump has done, it has certainly separated the wheat from the chaff, as far as conservativism goes.
That doesn't answer the question I asked. Seems like more of a defensive deflection?
Posted on 10/22/19 at 3:57 pm to davyjones
quote:
Or is it just an assumption and the worker bees are furiously trying to find something to fit those allegations?
That^+
Posted on 10/22/19 at 3:57 pm to Tani
quote:
Abuse of power, extortion, conspiracy, obstruction of justice, violation of the Emoluments Clause...that’s a pretty good start, don’t you think?

Posted on 10/22/19 at 4:00 pm to Jax-Tiger
Hillary is going to run again..... time for Republicans to call for her impeachment.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 4:04 pm to Dale51
Lol it's easy to tell when they don't have anything....there's a conspicuous absence of leak after leak that would be followed by endless crowing by Democrats.
Popular
Back to top



0


