- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 4/28/22 at 11:27 am to xxTIMMYxx
Although 'women's rights' are a thing, so are human (unborn baby) rights.
Why are their rights never brought up?
Why are their rights never brought up?
Posted on 4/28/22 at 11:36 am to WonderWartHawg
I have no idea what is coming down the pipeline but I doubt that Roe v. Wade is dead but I would also not be surprised if the court allowed a number of limitations from the state as to what rights a woman has versus the rights of the state over the unborn child
Posted on 4/28/22 at 11:59 am to dafif
I think the inference here is that if Roberts doesn't write the opinion, it decreases the chance of what you're talking about. Assuming Alito/Thomas/Gorsuch are for overturning Roe, and Kagan/Sotomayor/Breyer are for keeping Roe, the likely options become:
6-3 with all purported conservatives against Roe
5-4 or more like 5-3-1 against Roe, with Roberts not in the majority because the majority is taking a definitive stance against Roe as bad law
6-3 or 5-4 to keep Roe in some form. Pulling Roberts plus ACB/Kav is plausible, but the issue is that it seems highly unlikely that ACB/Kav are signing onto an opinion authored by one of the libs. To get this result the assumption would be some split the baby Roberts-style approach with the CJ writing the opinion.
But all that said, Roberts could very well still write the Dobbs opinion, it wouldn't be unprecedented or anything like that.
6-3 with all purported conservatives against Roe
5-4 or more like 5-3-1 against Roe, with Roberts not in the majority because the majority is taking a definitive stance against Roe as bad law
6-3 or 5-4 to keep Roe in some form. Pulling Roberts plus ACB/Kav is plausible, but the issue is that it seems highly unlikely that ACB/Kav are signing onto an opinion authored by one of the libs. To get this result the assumption would be some split the baby Roberts-style approach with the CJ writing the opinion.
But all that said, Roberts could very well still write the Dobbs opinion, it wouldn't be unprecedented or anything like that.
Posted on 4/28/22 at 12:02 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
because the majority is taking a definitive stance against Roe as bad law
which it is, and always had been. regardless of your feelings on abortion, it's a terrible decision in every way. Even Lawrence Tribe admits that.
Posted on 4/28/22 at 12:17 pm to Bard
quote:
Blaming Trump and/or Elon for the upcoming death of millions of women "who now have to get abortions in alleys" in 3... 2...
They don't "have" to do that. They could choose to have the baby and give it up for adoption, or, God forbid, raise the child themselves.
Posted on 4/28/22 at 12:25 pm to anc
Will abortion be dead in the USA or will it refer back to the states? If so I assume all the blue ones will still allow it.
Posted on 4/28/22 at 12:26 pm to alphaandomega
quote:
Will abortion be dead in the USA or will it refer back to the states? If so I assume all the blue ones will still allow it.
States
Something like 24-26 states have laws readied for a potential Roe overturn.
Posted on 4/28/22 at 12:42 pm to Pettifogger
If this goes back to the states then is it possible for some states to have even more lax pro abortion laws?
Posted on 4/28/22 at 12:45 pm to Bwmdx
quote:
If this goes back to the states then is it possible for some states to have even more lax pro abortion laws?
Yes.
Posted on 4/28/22 at 12:50 pm to Bwmdx
California on deck with the "post birth" legislation...
Posted on 4/28/22 at 12:50 pm to joshnorris14
quote:And it will be the melt of all melts. Cant wait for all the blue hair tears.
We have over a month to prepare for the greatest melt of all time.
Posted on 4/28/22 at 12:56 pm to therick711
I could not have said it better myself.
Posted on 4/28/22 at 4:25 pm to anc
I just hope this starts to put an end to SCOTUS making national law. Ie...gay marriage needs to go away and left to states too.
Posted on 4/28/22 at 4:27 pm to xxTIMMYxx
quote:wrong. abortion is about Satan's thirst for dead babies. civilizations after civilizations have killed babies. the common tie is satan.
Abortion started and still is about population control and eugenics. It’s never changed
Posted on 4/28/22 at 4:56 pm to arcalades
Both. Eugenics was designed to lower the population of "undesirables" which in the past meant non-whites. Satan is behind racism as well.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News