- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/20/25 at 9:09 am to dgnx6
quote:
They could release millions of files and people would say it’s still not all the files because it doesn’t show Trump having sex with children.
The administration actually said that this was a limited release. They said it. Were they lying?
Posted on 12/20/25 at 9:10 am to Jbird
This would be a ridiculous mistake.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 9:12 am to Jbird
They are taking normal redaction language and making a big deal of it.
This is their specialty. Taking control of the narrative and creating something out of nothing.
The bills redaction language is not noteworthy at all. For instance, there are no documents released publicly without redactions that would risk national security.
I don’t know which influencer started the redaction bullshite, but it was probably a progressive one and it seems to have worked on some “conservatives”.
This is their specialty. Taking control of the narrative and creating something out of nothing.
The bills redaction language is not noteworthy at all. For instance, there are no documents released publicly without redactions that would risk national security.
I don’t know which influencer started the redaction bullshite, but it was probably a progressive one and it seems to have worked on some “conservatives”.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 9:12 am to Jugbow
quote:
Promises made, promises broken.
The Trump administration is still hiding information.
Classic groomer behavior.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 9:13 am to TBoy
quote:Another simpleton, were you bent when laptop documents weren't released on time due to redaction delays?
The administration actually said that this was a limited release. They said it. Were they lying?
frick no you phony fricks dgaf.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 9:13 am to KiwiHead
quote:The principled Meghan McMassie will do it.
This would be a ridiculous mistake.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 9:13 am to roadGator
quote:
The bills redaction language is not noteworthy at all. For instance, there are no documents released publicly without redactions that would risk national security.
The legal ongoing court orders say otherwise. Another fluid situation.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 9:15 am to TBoy
quote:
The administration actually said that this was a limited release. They said it. Were they lying?
There will never be a release that implicates Trump.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 9:17 am to Jugbow
quote:
The legal ongoing court orders say otherwise
I’m open to read “legal ongoing court orders” that direct anyone to release unredacted documents that would jeopardize national security.
Cite?
Posted on 12/20/25 at 9:20 am to imjustafatkid
quote:Biden's DOJ had them.
There will never be a release that implicates Trump.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 9:21 am to roadGator
Ask Massie he acknowledged that all files won’t be released because of grand jury and current court orders pertaining to this. If I had them I’d give them to ya bud. I believe New York has custody? Another problem that we all run into here is NDA’s and personal lawsuits, we will never know the full truth unfortunately.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 9:22 am to jbdawgs03
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Man, that kinda puts a dent in the Dems’ plans to impeach. But then, when have little things like facts kept them from doing things.
This post was edited on 12/20/25 at 9:25 am
Posted on 12/20/25 at 9:24 am to BarnHater
quote:
Oh they’re big mad that Clinton got exposed
The new lunatic wing of the Democratic Party doesn’t give two shits about the Clintons.
They would burn all the old Democrats to get Trump
Posted on 12/20/25 at 9:24 am to Jugbow
No citation?
Bluster only?
Redirect?
Deflect?
You made a claim. I’d be willing to read the citation and let you prove I’m wrong.
But I need the citation for ongoing legal orders that allow the the jeopardizing of national security.
You were a Marine. You know that doesn’t make sense.
This is where MoT stops posting in a thread.
Provide the cite and you are way better and honest than MoT and I’ll stop calling you him after an alter check of course. Just to be sure.
Mot never used bud.
Bluster only?
Redirect?
Deflect?
You made a claim. I’d be willing to read the citation and let you prove I’m wrong.
But I need the citation for ongoing legal orders that allow the the jeopardizing of national security.
You were a Marine. You know that doesn’t make sense.
This is where MoT stops posting in a thread.
Provide the cite and you are way better and honest than MoT and I’ll stop calling you him after an alter check of course. Just to be sure.
Mot never used bud.
This post was edited on 12/20/25 at 9:26 am
Posted on 12/20/25 at 9:25 am to Jbird
Massie and Ro are dumb and dumber
Posted on 12/20/25 at 9:26 am to Jbird
Trump knew the game they were playing.
No one is surprised by congress critters acting stupid. Virtually no dif between Khanna and Massie.
No one is surprised by congress critters acting stupid. Virtually no dif between Khanna and Massie.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 9:27 am to LSUnation78
If you ignore reality and make up an alternative one there’s no difference.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 9:27 am to roadGator
quote:
Mot never used bud.
Probably because I’m not the person you’re convinced I am, bud.
Posted on 12/20/25 at 9:29 am to Jugbow
Hank is doing the same thing with his alter.
You two need to have AI rewrite your posts for you because the same patterns, phrases, words and attitude need altered.
Maybe I’ll do an alter check one day.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News