- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kyle Rittenhouse Trial StartingToday
Posted on 11/2/21 at 3:23 pm to BobBoucher
Posted on 11/2/21 at 3:23 pm to BobBoucher
quote:that was obvious but by stating it like that he gets it on the table immediately.
This is because he has felony charges pending that he supplied Kyle his gun.
The defense attorney exposed it brilliantly. He said “so…. You hope to avoid jail time by testifying here today?” Black said “yes”.
Posted on 11/2/21 at 3:37 pm to CAD703X
who's the pussy who won't allow himself on camera? my guess is its the guy kyle wounded.
Posted on 11/2/21 at 3:37 pm to CAD703X
Generally when they do this it's because it's a minor on the stand.
Posted on 11/2/21 at 3:37 pm to CAD703X
They are saying he is either a minor or an undercover cop.
Posted on 11/2/21 at 3:41 pm to CAD703X
quote:The prosecution identified the witness by name ... Washington. Clearly NOT Gaige Grosskreutz.
who's the pussy who won't allow himself on camera? my guess is its the guy kyle wounded.
For a year, the forum has been discussing the fact that the jurors would be afraid of reaction in the community. Is it any less-reasonable to think that a witness might be concerned about the same issue?
What does it matter whether you and I get to see every witness? Especially if it means that the witness can provide honest testimony with less fear of reprisal from the mob?
Locke
EDIT TO ADD
Clearly NOT anything having to do with the age if the witness, since they were discussing a juvenile arrest in 2004 and adult convictions on misdemeanors in 2008.
If the witness were a cop, they would have said that.
This judge is concerned about what the jury hears, not what you and I get to hear.
This post was edited on 11/2/21 at 3:45 pm
Posted on 11/2/21 at 3:42 pm to CAD703X
Yea, that doesn't sit well.
Posted on 11/2/21 at 3:47 pm to TankBoys32
Did anyone else notice that the prosecutor repeatedly referenced Rittenhouse by name during his opening?
I think he made a big error there, assuming that he actually wants to get a conviction. He was humanizing Rittenhouse in the eyes of the jury and thereby assisting the defense.
Locke
I think he made a big error there, assuming that he actually wants to get a conviction. He was humanizing Rittenhouse in the eyes of the jury and thereby assisting the defense.
Locke
This post was edited on 11/2/21 at 4:04 pm
Posted on 11/2/21 at 3:51 pm to wareaglepete
quote:
This is a very important case. This is about so much more than Rittenhouse.
This is another of those politically-instigated, pacification trials in another attempt to make an example of Rittenhouse, just like what was done with Chauvin.
In that they actually believe naively that making examples of defendants in these type cases will somehow cut down on future rioting and property destruction by the dregs.
So it necessitates gross over-charging of such accused.
Which results in even more intense and widespread dysfunctional behavior.
Posted on 11/2/21 at 3:53 pm to jackamo3300
Except there's no fear of any rioting happening once Rittenhouse is cleared. None of the rioters that he shot were African American.
Posted on 11/2/21 at 4:30 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
Except there's no fear of any rioting happening once Rittenhouse is cleared. None of the rioters that he shot were African American.
Posted on 11/2/21 at 4:31 pm to LockeNLoad
quote:
For a year, the forum has been discussing the fact that the jurors would be afraid of reaction in the community.
Long time lurker, eh?
Posted on 11/2/21 at 4:34 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Wasn't aggiehank the poster that had the sketched photo of an atheist as his sig pic?
Posted on 11/2/21 at 4:36 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
Except there's no fear of any rioting happening once Rittenhouse is cleared. None of the rioters that he shot were African American.
Oh really??

Posted on 11/2/21 at 4:44 pm to xGeauxLSUx
I really believe some people are possessed by demons after seeing that "thing".
Posted on 11/2/21 at 4:56 pm to TankBoys32
I'm more mad about the $2.09 gas. FJB
This post was edited on 11/2/21 at 4:58 pm
Posted on 11/2/21 at 5:01 pm to LockeNLoad
You’re not sending an email. It’s ok to not include a signature.
Posted on 11/2/21 at 5:02 pm to Veritas
quote:
You’re not sending an email. It’s ok to not include a signature.
Posted on 11/2/21 at 5:03 pm to LockeNLoad
quote:
For a year, the forum has been discussing the fact that the jurors would be afraid of reaction in the community
quote:
LockeNLoad
Texas A&M Fan
Omnipresent
Member since Oct 20211
you're such a terrible alter
Popular
Back to top



1







