- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LA Sec of State tells Trump's voter commission to stick it
Posted on 7/3/17 at 3:17 pm to islandtiger
Posted on 7/3/17 at 3:17 pm to islandtiger
quote:
Certainly not enough to worry about and not the 5 million Trump so desperately wants to find so he can sleep at night.
Well thanks to some assholes afraid of looking like incompetent imbeciles at the state government level I guess we will never know for sure whether your statement is true or absolute dogshit.
1
Posted on 7/3/17 at 3:24 pm to GeauxLSUGeaux
So the small government conservative position is that states should give whatever information the feds want at any time for any reason so they can prove they're not chicken?
Jesus Christ, Poliboard.
Jesus Christ, Poliboard.
Posted on 7/3/17 at 3:27 pm to keakar
quote:Actually it does not mean that at all
and that means those 29 states have admitted to massive voter fraud going on that they let happen and don't want it to be looked into.
Posted on 7/3/17 at 3:28 pm to Walking the Earth
quote:
the small government conservative position is that states should give whatever information the feds want at any time for any reason so they can prove they're not chicken?
not this one
i don't buy for a second that states should cede a motherfricking shred of their authority on regulating elections, just because Trump pulled some number out of his arse
lol just lol at that joke of an argument
Posted on 7/3/17 at 3:28 pm to Gaspergou202
quote:
I'll keep this in mind next election. Bet his opponents will remember this too.
This.
Posted on 7/3/17 at 3:30 pm to 90proofprofessional
1. First a Dem governor.
2. Pandering scumbag mayor takes down statues.
3. Now this!!!
Get your shite straight down there!!!
2. Pandering scumbag mayor takes down statues.
3. Now this!!!
Get your shite straight down there!!!
This post was edited on 7/3/17 at 3:32 pm
Posted on 7/3/17 at 3:31 pm to Walking the Earth
quote:
So the small government conservative position is that states should give whatever information the feds want at any time for any reason so they can prove they're not chicken?
Y'all are so fricking stupid. This information is already information that the federal government has. Who the frick you think gives you a social security number in the first place? The fricking feds, to keep track of your income for the IRS. What kind of rights are being infringed by this? None. Don't be fricking stupid.
Posted on 7/3/17 at 3:31 pm to GeauxLSUGeaux
quote:Holy strawman, bootlicker!
If it were Obama telling businesses they had to make gay wedding cakes against their will you'd be standing up and clapping you fricking hypocrite.
Posted on 7/3/17 at 3:32 pm to redneck hippie
quote:
If this were Obama you guys would be screaming state's rights. kinda surprised how quickly you "conservatives" change your stances based on who's in the WH. SAD!
True, but reason being Obama hated everyday Americans and nobody would feel comfortable with him having all this information.
Posted on 7/3/17 at 3:33 pm to JuiceTerry
quote:
quote: If it were Obama telling businesses they had to make gay wedding cakes against their will you'd be standing up and clapping you fricking hypocrite. Holy strawman, bootlicker!
Yea, telling privately owned businesses what to do is way better than telling state governments what to do! Holier than thou much?
Posted on 7/3/17 at 3:33 pm to GeauxLSUGeaux
quote:
Y'all are so fricking stupid. This information is already information that the federal government has.
Are you aware of all the items the commission requested for each voter?
Posted on 7/3/17 at 3:37 pm to GeauxLSUGeaux
quote:
What kind of rights are being infringed by this? None. Don't be fricking stupid.
It's the only time a liberal gets to yell "States Rights"
Posted on 7/3/17 at 3:38 pm to GeauxLSUGeaux
quote:
Well when Trump says 5 million people voted illegally they can shut the frick up then.
So every bullshite claim thrown out must be proved wrong? If hrs got 21 states thats plenty to do some statistical extrapolations to build a case for this mysterious 5 million votes......
Posted on 7/3/17 at 3:40 pm to GeauxLSUGeaux
Has absolutely nothing to do with this subject. That's why it's called a strawman. Not to mention, that is a state's rights argument. Obama didn't tell anyone to do anything regarding that. Just a whack arse post all around.
Posted on 7/3/17 at 3:40 pm to 90proofprofessional
quote:
Are you aware of all the items the commission requested for each voter?
All of the items needed to register to vote? Which means they have the information anyway. This isn't looking at your internet history for fricks sake. This is information that the government already has. They only want to cross reference the voter rolls to make sure it matches and there is no mass voter fraud. I'm failing to see what information they can get from this that can hurt me in anyway. Why don't you tell me how this affects me negatively since I'm so ignorant?
This post was edited on 7/3/17 at 3:42 pm
Posted on 7/3/17 at 3:41 pm to Walking the Earth
There is no small government conservatism left here, only tribal anti-liberalism
Posted on 7/3/17 at 3:41 pm to 90proofprofessional
quote:
Are you aware of all the items the commission requested for each voter?
Yes. And if the state didn't want to turn in all the information, they could have submitted partial information.
Posted on 7/3/17 at 3:42 pm to 90proofprofessional
Poor Donald's going to be pissed
Posted on 7/3/17 at 3:47 pm to GeauxLSUGeaux
The post you responded to with the claim about this all being info they have already:
Now it's:
So would the feds be acquiring new information about individual voters, or wouldn't they? I wouldn't want to make it any easier than it already is for an Obama or Trump administration to be able to put together my voting history, or for their stooges to leak them en masse. I do trust LA SOS to both not give all that shite Trump asked for to any administration (outside of the basic stuff they sell everyone), or to have the detailed stuff leaked. You do you though
quote:
the small government conservative position is that states should give whatever information the feds want at any time for any reason so they can prove they're not chicken
Now it's:
quote:
They only want to cross reference the voter rolls
So would the feds be acquiring new information about individual voters, or wouldn't they? I wouldn't want to make it any easier than it already is for an Obama or Trump administration to be able to put together my voting history, or for their stooges to leak them en masse. I do trust LA SOS to both not give all that shite Trump asked for to any administration (outside of the basic stuff they sell everyone), or to have the detailed stuff leaked. You do you though
Posted on 7/3/17 at 3:48 pm to 90proofprofessional
Why is it that all Dem posters on here find joy in the fact that states do not want to investigate for voter fraud?
It certainly can't be time or money, because they are all in on investigating voter collusion between Russia.
So.............. what exactly is your reason why Dems?
It certainly can't be time or money, because they are all in on investigating voter collusion between Russia.
So.............. what exactly is your reason why Dems?
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News