- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Let’s assume the jury got it right.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 5:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 5/31/24 at 5:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
I had posted this earlier, but if Trump had pardoned Cohen . Do you think this case ever moves forward? That is something that keeps knawing at me.
1
Posted on 5/31/24 at 5:20 pm to lsuguy84
quote:
He dared to run for re-election. That’s it.
And he was conspiring to campaign to beat Biden.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 5:21 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
I had posted this earlier, but if Trump had pardoned Cohen . Do you think this case ever moves forward?
If they don't have Cohen, I doubt it.
Would NY have been able to prosecute Cohen becomes the question.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 5:24 pm to OysterPoBoy
Had it not been this show trial, the dirty comrades would have come up with several more loads of BS lawfare and the clapping seals in the MSM would proclaim it true.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 5:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
What a colossal frick up by Trump. You pardon Cohen. Cohen keeps his mouth shut. At the worst it makes Bragg's job many magnitudes harder because he doesn't have a guide
Posted on 5/31/24 at 5:28 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:ie an idiot
His justification was the mental issues of Biden.
quote:ok well you obviously aren't anymore fit to stand trial than Biden is
Jack Smith is moving forward against Biden?
This post was edited on 5/31/24 at 5:30 pm
Posted on 5/31/24 at 5:31 pm to KiwiHead
I think it was personal between Trump and Cohen at that point. And Trump saw Cohen as disloyal...and we all know what that does to Trump's brain
Posted on 5/31/24 at 5:32 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
ok well you obviously aren't anymore fit to stand trial than Biden is
quote:
Or are you bringing up a non-related situation without stating the transition?
Posted on 5/31/24 at 5:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:You have no idea as to the reputational damage this is doing to the Judicial Branch. In my estimation, it is generationally irreparable.
Even if he did, the case isn't over. They will re-try Trump
Posted on 5/31/24 at 5:45 pm to KiwiHead
quote:Cohen is a proven liar. Costello was set to establish him as a liar in this case. The POS judge refused to allow it.
What a colossal frick up by Trump. You pardon Cohen
Posted on 5/31/24 at 5:46 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
You have no idea as to the reputational damage this is doing to the Judicial Branch. In my estimation, it is generationally irreparable.
What does this have to do with re-trying Trump?
That's also a prosecutorial, not judicial, decision.
*ETA: the one way the courts could dismiss this whole case is to rule the entire statute unconstitutional. That's the one path.
This post was edited on 5/31/24 at 5:47 pm
Posted on 5/31/24 at 5:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:you saw "lawfare" is "malleable." I gave you 3 similar cases handled completely different based on the political persuasion of the alleged perpetrators. You play dumb and start the mental gymnastics because it's so you really all you can do especially when you've already admitted the NY judge was a partisan hack. Apparently partisan hack judges don't equal lawfare in your warped reality
Or are you bringing up a non-related situation without stating the transition?
Posted on 5/31/24 at 5:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:judicial partisan brain rot. Words mean things.
That's also a prosecutorial, not judicial, decision
Posted on 5/31/24 at 5:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:You'd be better served by asking yourself wtf it has to do w/ an LOL emoji.
What does this have to do with re-trying Trump?
Posted on 5/31/24 at 5:49 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
Apparently partisan hack judges don't equal lawfare in your warped reality
They theoretically can, especially if you can change what "lawfare" is with every scenario
Posted on 5/31/24 at 5:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Then define it.
They theoretically can, especially if you can change what "lawfare" is with every scenario
Posted on 5/31/24 at 5:53 pm to UncleFestersLegs
quote:
Then define it.
My stance on lawfare is that it's not well-defined (and lacks a consistent definition), so how can *I* define it?
Posted on 5/31/24 at 5:54 pm to OysterPoBoy
This. It's not the charge.. but I agree that the msm used that talking point so much that the people who didn't follow the case would believe the act of paying stormy at all....was illegal. And that's what they were going for.. to coax the masses into believing something not illegal...was illegal.
The technicalities of the actual charges were dull.. so it was best if the people who weren't following along just believe all of it was illegal.
The technicalities of the actual charges were dull.. so it was best if the people who weren't following along just believe all of it was illegal.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 5:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:There are a number of "paths." Regardless, the damage is done.
*ETA: the one way the courts could dismiss this whole case is to rule the entire statute unconstitutional. That's the one path.
Posted on 5/31/24 at 6:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Goodness
My stance on lawfare is that it's not well-defined
Let's make this as simple as we did previously.
• Law delineates an offense, then attempts to identify a target regardless of political persuasion.
• Lawfare delineates a target, typically based on political persuasion, then attempts to identify an offence or offenses.
Page 8 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News