- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Massie the only republican to vote against the SAVE Act
Posted on 2/11/26 at 1:09 pm to Jake88
Posted on 2/11/26 at 1:09 pm to Jake88
quote:Well, the bigger picture is if the Congress can require states to use ID, any future Congress can’t exclude IDs from being used (or worse).
On this issue, kinda. But many who voted for it are looking at the larger picture.
But, hey, we can trust democrats to do the right thing, amiright?
1
Posted on 2/11/26 at 1:10 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Taxation has never been seen as a governmetn power exclusive to states or the feds. It's always been an example of our duel sovereign federal system with concurrent/overlapping powers, like the police power.
So not every federal action on states is erosion of states rights.
quote:
I already told you it's illegal
Are ya hard of hearing boy? I asked you, SLOWFLOWPRO, IN YOUR OPINION, do you believe a state should allow illegals to vote in federal elections? I'm going to keep asking this until YOU answer it. You don't get to avoid giving an opinion because you are afraid of having to defend your personal opinion.
quote:
There is not a system that can prevent fraud, of any sort, at 100%. Fraudsters always have the advantage b/c they're willing to be dishonest.
Yes, but even you can fathom the fact that if there was a federal law, requiring voter ID, that a leftist county or state is now subject to oversight by the feds, thus a forced reduction of voter fraud via threat of federal charges if those states/counties/polls do not adhere by those election guidelines.
BTW, you won't answer any of these truthfully because everyone knows what you want. Your TDS (yes you have TDS) doesn't allow rationality to seep in. You are against a federal voter id laws because doing so would mean democrats will lose and Trump will win. And you support Democrats right now, because they also hate trump.The enemy of your enemy is your friend. That's really all it boils down to.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 1:10 pm to Taxing Authority
quote:
But, hey, we can trust democrats to do the right thing, amiright?
You're going to get the THEY'RE GOING TO DO IT ANYWAY silliness
Posted on 2/11/26 at 1:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You're going to get the THEY'RE GOING TO DO IT ANYWAY silliness
See gerrymandering for more details.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 1:13 pm to BugAC
quote:
So not every federal action on states is erosion of states rights.
I already addressed that
quote:
No. This is a particular area where states exert dominion.
You brought up taxation, which is not an area where states exert dominion as it's a function of both of our dual sovereigns, as the post you just quoted explained fully.
quote:
Yes, but even you can fathom the fact that if there was a federal law, requiring voter ID, that a leftist county or state is now subject to oversight by the feds, thus a forced reduction of voter fraud via threat of federal charges if those states/counties/polls do not adhere by those election guidelines.
Again, you're just giving excuses as to why being a hypocrite RINO is OK.
Also, you missed the point about how your question was bad.
quote:
BTW, you won't answer any of these truthfully
I have. All of them. You just don't like the answers b/c you either ignored what I said (see the dominion comments above) or didn't like me pointing out your question was bad/dishonest (Hopefully the urging above makes you think about it).
quote:
ou are against a federal voter id laws because doing so would mean democrats will lose and Trump will win. A
Now you're just saying retarded things
Posted on 2/11/26 at 1:14 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
Massie the only republican to vote against the SAVE Act
Posted on 2/11/26 at 1:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
Do you believe a state should allow illegals to vote in federal elections?
Why do you keep avoiding this question?
Why do you keep avoiding this question?
Posted on 2/11/26 at 1:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Criminals do have rights. Some of our amendments in the BOR specifically address those rights Why do you hate American values and the principles of our founders?
Our founders didn’t defend traitorous people abusing the constitution to advance their leftist causes. They wouldnt be defending this nonsense like you do. The would make amendments to fix the inherent flaws.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 1:17 pm to BugAC
quote:
Do you believe a state should allow illegals to vote in federal elections?
No states legally allow illegals to vote in any such elections.
quote:
Why do you keep avoiding this question?
I keep answering it. You just don't like the responses and keep asking it again. .
It's a bad question. I keep showing you why.
Like they say, you can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 1:17 pm to hawgfaninc
What the f$#@ is wrong with this guy?
Posted on 2/11/26 at 1:18 pm to djsdawg
quote:
They wouldnt be defending this nonsense like you do. The would make amendments to fix the inherent flaws.
That sounds like a much better plan than the SAVE Act
Posted on 2/11/26 at 1:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Fine.
Literally the reasoning of RINOs who abandon principle for convenience or popularity.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 1:20 pm to GumboPot
There's really no defending this
Posted on 2/11/26 at 1:22 pm to hawgfaninc
Put it on a single issue bill and we will see how he votes.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 1:23 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Fun Bunch
Posted on 2/11/26 at 1:23 pm to BugAC
quote:
See gerrymandering for more details.
The modern push for gerrymandering came by the right, not the left.
It was a brilliant strategy around the 2010 census. I forget the guy but he was a nobody who realized it was a lot cheaper to win state-level seats and by doing that in a Census year, you could "win" elections by shifting votes via changing districts via state edict. One of the best bangs for the buck ever in political history.
It's just that the left caught up and used certain cases won by right-adjacent plaintiffs to do it themselves. You can only do a plan like that once
Posted on 2/11/26 at 1:25 pm to Jbird
quote:Ignore the slow troll and carry on with the discussion.
SlowEverythingisirrelvantexceptmyopinionPro putting in work!
The moment I see his name; I scroll past his dialog.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 1:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That sounds like a much better plan than the SAVE Act
The liberals and LIBRINOS, and the RINOS have too much power to get this accomplished today. People like you enable the destruction of our nation.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 1:28 pm to RT1941
quote:
Ignore the slow troll and carry on with the discussion. The moment I see his name; I scroll past his dialog.
Smart.
As soon as you corner him, he runs away.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 1:29 pm to djsdawg
quote:
The liberals and LIBRINOS, and the RINOS have too much power to get this accomplished today.
Well tough titty, then.
quote:
People like you enable the destruction of our nation.
Your emotional-irrational comments are noted as such.
Page 4 of 20
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News