Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us 'Member when Putin said he'd use nukes? | Page 5 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: 'Member when Putin said he'd use nukes?

Posted on 9/21/22 at 3:40 pm to
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
36243 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

Referring to the Baltics?

No, I am referring to Norway. The Baltic states joined in 2004.

quote:

But, Putin made an excellent case re: Ukraine/Georgia when addressing NATO in the Baltics. He pointed out NATO exercises flying nuke capable bombers 12mi from the Latvian-Russian border.

The US wouldn't tolerate Russian nukes 90 miles from Florida. Obviously NATO Bombers are an offensive weapon. Obviously their presence 12 miles away requires a defensive fighter and anti-aircraft missile scramble. That response is (1) revealing of defenses, and (2) very costly. Extending those responsibilities/exposures 4X or more (in perpetuity) for Russia is untenable. Russia wants a buffer. Russia needs a buffer. That should not be so difficult to comprehend.

I see what you are saying, but why did Putin wait almost twenty years and then attack Ukraine if he was super-duper threatened by NATO forces being present on his border since 2004? That is the part that does not make sense. The geographic situation between NATO and Russia directly has been static for quite a while now. It also ignores that Ukraine was nowhere near NATO membership.

quote:

Those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it. For that reason, Russia damn well does not want German-French forces and their allies encamped along Russia's entire western border.

I guess here is our difference of opinion. You seem to believe that Russia actually and legitimately perceives NATO's presence in the Baltic states/eastern Europe as a national security threat. I do not believe that Russia actually views NATO's presence there as a threat to their national security. I do think they see it as a threat to their ultimate ambition of bringing ethnic Russian territory back under the Russian flag, and a threat to their economic/cultural domination of the region. I believe they conveniently turn to that "easy" excuse for acting out when it suits them. Which of course it their prerogative, but that does not make it legitimate.

Besides, the only thing this invasion has accomplished vis-a-vis Russia and NATO is to bring in Finland and Sweden to the alliance--which was entirely predictable. Therefore I am only left to believe that NATO was not Russia's ultimate goal here--it makes no sense and the only possible outcome was a stronger and more united NATO. It is simply obvious to me that their cultural/territorial/economic ambitions for eastern Ukraine were always the predominant factor, and fear of NATO was just the excuse.


This post was edited on 9/21/22 at 3:43 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
136789 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

If Russia takes Ukraine
They never had intention of taking Ukraine. Never!
quote:

remaining Ukraine will join NATO
Yeah? .... Not happening.

As long as that is a threat, Russia will press the attack. More Ukrainians will die needlessly. If Russians eventually need to level Kiev, they will. NATO in Ukraine is that important to them.

In terms of your presumption, Ukraine was willing to pull NATO off the table permanently in April. Biden/Johnson scuttled those negotiations.
Posted by BayouBlitz
Member since Aug 2007
18126 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

Indefatigable


Well stated.

Remember when Putin said the Operation's goal was denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine bad guys?

And now he's looking to annex Ukraine territory. It was never about NATO or nazis. It was always a land grab.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
136789 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

I am referring to Norway

Okay.
Good luck with a land invasion there.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
36243 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

Okay.
Good luck with a land invasion there.


Hey, Russia did it in reverse in Occupied on Netflix

Point stands though. I just do not buy Russia's stated justification or, more accurately, I do not buy that the given public justification is the actual motivation for their actions. Given the Russians' historical (and to some extent cultural) propensity for obfuscation, I do not think I am way into left field in believing that either. The NATO angle just doesn't hold water for me because the end result of this invasion was never going to be anything other than a stronger and more united NATO, particularly on the Eastern edge. Putin knows that. He just doesn't care, because he knows the West is weak at the moment and won't do anything about it.

But we have gone around and around on this in several threads since this war started. No need to do it all again.
This post was edited on 9/21/22 at 3:55 pm
Posted by blueridgeTiger
Granbury, TX
Member since Jun 2004
22118 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 3:52 pm to
The whole world is festering
With unhappy souls
The French hate the Germans
The Germans hate the Poles

Italians hate Yugoslavs
South Africans hate the Dutch
And I don't like
Anybody very much

But we can be tranquil
And thankful and proud
For man's been endowed
With a mushroom shaped cloud

And we know for certain
That some lovely day
Someone will set the spark off
And we will all be blown away
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
136789 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

Remember when Putin said the Operation's goal was denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine bad guys?
At this point, you probably should drop out of the discussion. But go ahead and post a Ukraine flag as you do. It will make you feel soooooooooooo ... patriotic.
Posted by BayouBlitz
Member since Aug 2007
18126 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

At this point, you probably should drop out of the discussion. But go ahead and post a Ukraine flag as you do. It will make you feel soooooooooooo ... patriotic.


Well that's an ignorant response to a fact.

Not surprising.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
136789 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 4:03 pm to
quote:

Well that's an ignorant response to a fact.
The fact that nazification and militarization in Eastern Ukraine was a problem for ethnic Russians? You have no clue as to WTF you are talking about. Post a Blue and Gold Flag like any democrat "patriot", and move on.
Posted by blueridgeTiger
Granbury, TX
Member since Jun 2004
22118 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 4:24 pm to
Retired US General says US will retaliate with 'a devastating strike' against Russia's Black Sea Fleet or bases in Crimea if Putin follows through on threat to use nuclear weapons in Ukraine.

Retired Lieutenant General Ben Hodges today said any response by America 'may not be nuclear' but warned that if Putin were to use nukes in Ukraine that the US could look to 'destroy the Black Sea Fleet or destroy Russian bases in Crimea'.

Gen Hodges, who commanded the US Army in Europe between 2014 and 2018, stressed the 'possibility' of Putin ordering a nuclear strike on Ukraine was 'very unlikely'.

But he said the use of any strategic weapons of mass destruction would be met with a swift and severe reaction from President Joe Biden.



Daily Mail
Posted by Tigers2010a
Member since Jul 2021
3627 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 8:07 pm to
quote:

You either struggle with literacy, or you're so lazy you didn't even open the link.


Ever wonder how many of these are simply paid trolls? For some, it is their job.
Posted by Tigers2010a
Member since Jul 2021
3627 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 8:09 pm to
quote:

and the wild eyed nonsense of Victoria Nuland, Baraq Obama, George Soros, and all of the CIA who have broken all trust in Ukraine in this geopolitical disaster


Not to mention that the Ukraine was a WEF poster child project.
Posted by JJJimmyJimJames
Southern States
Member since May 2020
18496 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 8:11 pm to
quote:

Are you saying that nuclear-capable missiles, the warheads themselves, their fuel, etc. do not have to be well maintained in order to function?

No what I am saying is that one "blowing up" due to lack of 'maintenance' is an absurd thought, to the point of impossibility.

Nuclear weapons dont suddenly initiate nuclear fission because someone didnt spray some WD-40 on a fuse, or a button, or a case.

Nuclear weapons depart from standard explosives and ordinance so as to be completely out of the purveyance of standard explosive rules and regimen.

Hence a distinct lack of understanding of this technology
Posted by JJJimmyJimJames
Southern States
Member since May 2020
18496 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 8:17 pm to
quote:


Well stated.

Remember when Putin said the Operation's goal was denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine bad guys?

And now he's looking to annex Ukraine territory. It was never about NATO or nazis. It was always a land grab.
no peabrain, it is about another power insisting on setting up shop right on their doorstep - that is ALL it is.. the perseverance of the bear to keep NATO/USA/Bioweapons labs out of access to Russia.

This is a set rule that is applicable to any superpower in the existence of world history. This can not be emphasized enough.

Pretending it is some of the things I am hearing here is an absurdity - an absurdity destined to get your children or grandchildren murdered in war in a completely unnecessary pretense/mistake with Victoria Nuland, Baraq the Kenyan, Clintons, Bidens, Romneys in control of the murder/payola.
This post was edited on 9/21/22 at 8:25 pm
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
15050 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 8:22 pm to
quote:

another power insisting on setting up shop right on their doorstep


Except, they've had that for years and now because of this action two additional countries have made actions to join.

So either it's not that or Putin is very bad at game theory.
Posted by H2P
Member since Jun 2021
1624 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 8:25 pm to
Well we’re supplying weapons to kill his citizens. What are you upset about?
Posted by JJJimmyJimJames
Southern States
Member since May 2020
18496 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 8:27 pm to
quote:

So either it's not that or Putin is very bad at game theory.

or a 3rd option; Putin has attempted to accomodate the Evil Empire
Posted by jonnyanony
Member since Nov 2020
15050 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

or a 3rd option; Putin has attempted to accomodate the Evil Empire


I don't know what you mean by that, sorry.

I personally don't believe that Russia is so bad at strategy that they didn't know what would happen if they very belatedly invaded to stop NATO troops.

And today they released the war criminal POWs that were the supposed Nazis. Only one narrative makes sense at this point and that's purely the restoration of Ukrainian people and lands into Russia.
Posted by JJJimmyJimJames
Southern States
Member since May 2020
18496 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 9:32 pm to
meaning that he may have thought that for USA state department to attempt nation building he could wait it out and see if US Democrats are truly FCKUPs - they are but continued on any way.

So, after the Crimean adventure he saw a respite.

Unfortunately the Americans were as devious as he could have feared.

Accommodation.

Too much accommodation and he returned fairly quickly to defeat the enemy on his doorstep.

American Democrats deciding Ukraine elections in 2014? Too much?

American Democrats deciding US elections and staying in Ukraine with biolabs? sorry, line crossed.

Then
Posted by BayouBlitz
Member since Aug 2007
18126 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 9:40 pm to
Are you drunk?
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram