- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 4/25/22 at 4:04 pm to timdonaghyswhistle
quote:
I have a feeling Musk already has access to it.
Agreed. My money is on inside men.
Posted on 4/25/22 at 4:06 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Even once the ink dries and Musk owns the company outright, Twitter's entire architecture was a US government/Intel Community operation that was actively working to run counter to the Constitution and violate American citizens' First Amendment rights to free speech.
You really didn't think that Jack Dorsey whipped the website up, did you?
Ditto with Zuckerbot & LifeLog.
You're right, I forgot everything always flows back to a massive conspiracy involving 1000s, if not 100s of 1000s of people.
Posted on 4/25/22 at 4:09 pm to cwill
This is a conspiracy theory but “muh Russians” was the real deal, huh?
Posted on 4/25/22 at 4:11 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Even once the ink dries and Musk owns the company outright, Twitter's entire architecture was a US government/Intel Community operation that was actively working to run counter to the Constitution and violate American citizens' First Amendment rights to free speech.
Posted on 4/25/22 at 4:17 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
You really didn't think that Jack Dorsey whipped the website up, did you?
Ditto with Zuckerbot & LifeLog.
This. 1000x this. Add Google to the list as well.
Posted on 4/25/22 at 4:33 pm to m2pro
quote:
Like what?
there are none. he has confused open source with something else
Posted on 4/25/22 at 4:46 pm to cwill
quote:
How would a private company limiting users as it saw fit be "corrupt" or against the law? Section 230 does not require open access (nor does it distinguish between publisher/platform) and, in fact, provides liability immunity for banning users.
When you testify under oath that examples of censorship brought before congress was the outcome of unbiased algorithms at work and that ends up being untrue.
Section 230 still exists, in part, because of the algorithm lie.
quote:
Moar government
More transparency
Posted on 4/25/22 at 4:49 pm to bamarep
BamaRep
How's the Q doing?
Has your imaginary friend been right yet?
How's the Q doing?
Has your imaginary friend been right yet?
Posted on 4/25/22 at 5:00 pm to cwill
quote:
Moar government.
No one here is an anarchist so what point do you think you’re making?
Posted on 4/25/22 at 5:02 pm to cwill
quote:
Moar government.
I'll take a few regulations that inhibit tyranny.
Posted on 4/25/22 at 5:24 pm to McChowder
quote:
I think the biggest win in all of this might be Musk's promise to make the algorithm public. Total transparency. If it uncovers the blatant corruption I think it will, we might see legislation under a new majority which requires platforms to disclose their algorithms in order to maintain their section 230 protections.
I might reactivate my twitter account once Musk has finalized the deal and everything is out in the open.
Posted on 4/25/22 at 5:46 pm to WeeWee
quote:
I might reactivate my twitter account once Musk has finalized the deal and everything is out in the open.
It sure was fun while it lasted!
Posted on 4/25/22 at 5:56 pm to Tmcgin
quote:
Has your imaginary friend been right yet?
He made John Durham a household name.
Your flaccid attempt at some kind of sick burn via implication that Q existed aa some kind of fortune cookie is noted, but denied.
Posted on 4/25/22 at 5:57 pm to Tmcgin
quote:
Tmcgin
This is hitting you hard, huh?
Posted on 4/25/22 at 6:02 pm to cwill
quote:
You're right, I forgot everything always flows back to a massive conspiracy involving 1000s, if not 100s of 1000s of people.
Tell us that you do not understand the role of DARPA black book projects and their relationship to the current pillars of the big Tech Community without telling us.
Posted on 4/25/22 at 6:06 pm to McChowder
The "algorithm" is just a scoring and sorting function, what exactly is it you think you're going to discover?
Posted on 4/25/22 at 6:12 pm to musick
quote:
tell me you know nothing of algorithms without actually telling me
Actually, it's 100% true that if you could see the algorithm you'd have a better chance of gaming it.
You might see that recent follows increases your relevance score, or that repeated replies to the same account in the last week decreases it, etc.
But almost assuredly there are inputs that are generated via ml to measure general concepts such as negativity, argumentativeness, etc. Since they're inputs, they're not included in the algorithm itself.
Models that classify your tweets as negative or "misinformation" or whatever, wouldn't be included in that code.
Posted on 4/25/22 at 6:17 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Even once the ink dries and Musk owns the company outright, Twitter's entire architecture was a US government/Intel Community operation that was actively working to run counter to the Constitution and violate American citizens' First Amendment rights to free speech.
Musk has to know this, and the potential risks. Brave man to jump in the ring.
Posted on 4/25/22 at 6:18 pm to McChowder
quote:
I think the biggest win in all of this might be Musk's promise to make the algorithm public. Total transparency. If it uncovers the blatant corruption I think it will, we might see legislation under a new majority which requires platforms to disclose their algorithms in order to maintain their section 230 protections.
How will the NSA/CIA adjust?
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News